Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Pick the best prospect from the following list
Acolatse 1 0.32%
Agostino 0 0%
Arnold 2 0.63%
Billins 0 0%
Carroll 0 0%
Culkin 0 0%
Cundari 0 0%
Deblouw 0 0%
Elson 0 0%
Ferland 0 0%
Gillies 26 8.20%
Gilmour 0 0%
Hanowski 0 0%
Harrison 0 0%
Hickey 1 0.32%
Jankowski 8 2.52%
Jooris 0 0%
Kanzig 0 0%
Klimchuk 138 43.53%
Knight 1 0.32%
Kulak 0 0%
McDonald 0 0%
Ollas Mattson 0 0%
Ortio 19 5.99%
Rafikov 0 0%
Ramage 0 0%
Reinhart 25 7.89%
Roy 0 0%
Sieloff 8 2.52%
Smith 0 0%
Thiessen 0 0%
Van Brabant 0 0%
Wolf 0 0%
Wotherspoon 88 27.76%
Voters: 317. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-18-2014, 09:42 AM   #21
lanny9
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: On The Dark Side Of The Moon
Exp:
Default

Was between Gillis and Ortio for me, went Ortio because of what he showed last year. Many are close in this area imo.

Last edited by lanny9; 07-18-2014 at 09:43 AM. Reason: stupid spell check
lanny9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:42 AM   #22
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Tough, tough call. I went for Gillies here, because I see him as a guy who could end up as a #1 goalie. Ortio has looked good, but I think Gillies has the edge. McDonald is a wildcard - too early to tell, but he does look to have promise.
Klimchuk was the other guy I was thinking of voting for here, and I do see him as a second/third line guy, but with Gillies potentially being a #1 goalie, I think he edges it.
Klimchuk will be next for me, then going to Wotherspoon, Ortio, Kulak, Jankowski as the next tier. McDonald may squeak into that group
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:43 AM   #23
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

My debate here is between Wortherspoon and Klimchuk. I see Wortherspoon as second pairing upside with bottom pairing downside.

I see Klimchuk as 2nd line upside, wash out downside.

Wortherspoon is closer to the NHL.

I have eliminated Reinhart for a while because I put him at 3rd line upside.

Will likely go Wortherspoon, Klimchuk, Ortio at this point.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:46 AM   #24
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Klimchuk for me here. Versatile winger that can not only play with elite players (as evidenced by playing with team Canada) but does well at it. Ability to score at a high rate, plays very solid defence and is an excellent character and leader?

I predict Klimchuk will be the most talked about prospect next to Bennett this upcoming season.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2014, 09:47 AM   #25
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

'Spoon deserves the love this round. A very good stay at home dman who will help this team immeasurably down the road.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:49 AM   #26
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

I picked Wotherspoon. I think the kid has top #3/4 potential.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2014, 09:53 AM   #27
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wotherspoon for me again. He should be higher on this list in my opinion. But such is life for most defencemen. Always flying under the radar and underappreciated.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:53 AM   #28
CsInMyBlood
Franchise Player
 
CsInMyBlood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: F*** me. We're so f***ing good, you check the f***ing standings? Lets f***ing go! F***ing practice!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
Klimchuk

Only concern I have with him is how soft he is. If he played with an edge like Bennet or Poirer he would be right with them. Maybe our most skilled prospect besides Johnny
Who are Bennet and Poirer?

I also went with the Calgary kid Klimchuk, with his injuries last season I don't really think we know what his ceiling could be. I could have also picked Gilles in this spot.

Not sold on Wotherspoon at this point. I watched him a bunch when he was with Portland (especially his final year) and saw all his games in the WJC and his NHL games with the Flames. He does play a fairly solid "no frills" game, but I'm not quite sure how that is going to translate in the NHL going forward.
__________________

Backlund for Selke 2017 2018
Oilers suck.
CsInMyBlood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:54 AM   #29
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Wotherspoon. Rarely injured, has done nothing but progressed on a steady incline since drafted. On the cusp of the NHL and could step in for 3/4 minutes already.
__________________

saXon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 09:54 AM   #30
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

The way this played out I was voting for Granlund for 3 rounds.

Now There is Klimchuck, Rienhart, Wootherspoon, and Sieloff and maybe Ortio/Gillies or MacDonald (I don't have any idea how goalies will turn out)

Klimchuck might end up being a player BUT he will be fortunate to get any NHL games this year. As a small forward he is behind Gaudreau, Hudler, Raymond, Byron, Granlund, and Baertschi.

Rienhart will see some NHL time ... he has done as well as can be expected in his 19 NHL games to date. He has also shown that he is a top player at the AHL level. When the Flames signed Byron they took away his NHL spot.

Wootherspoon has progressed nicely. He blew past Breen as the Flames top D prospect last year. He has a chance to make the Flames and be on the opening day roster if not in the lineup.

However Sieloff was going to be playing 20-40 games with the Flames last year.

All things being even (no freak injuries) he will be in the starting 2015-16 line-up so that makes him the best prospect at this point.

I see him as lower risk and very high upside compared to Baertschi and Poirier. Poirier might be the real deal but has to show where he stacks up against NHL players.

I will probably be voting for Sieloff for the next 3 to 5 rounds
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:01 AM   #31
old-fart
Franchise Player
 
old-fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Wavered between Klimchuk and Wotherspoon, but ultimately went with Klimchuk. Sieloff is a worthy candidate too.
old-fart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:06 AM   #32
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

GILLIES!!!



I'm going to post this in every poll thread until Gillies wins ... Let that be a warning to you!
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2014, 10:07 AM   #33
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Went with Gillies here. Large potential franchise goalie in the making.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:13 AM   #34
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Wotherspoon.

Already solid defensively, big enough, skates pretty well, makes a good read almost all the time. The offense is coming with him too. I saw glimpses of his passing ability last year and, while he may not score a lot of goals, should be a solid offensive player to at least be a 2nd pairing guy…and may even be the more defensive player in a top pairing.

I mean seriously people. Last season was his first PRO season. In that year he played top 4 minutes for Abbotsford, was a +13 despite only 9 points to his name, came up and played 14 games for the Flames (in a limited role) and had 4 assists and was so solid defensively that he came out only -3 on a bad team. Oh, and he turned just 21 in March, so he did all that as a 20 year old, which is way ahead of the curve for a defenseman.

He's not flashy, but he's the best defensive prospect we've had since Phaneuf. He's easily the most pro-ready player left on the board (ok, maybe Ortio).
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:16 AM   #35
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Went Sieloff here. Just a gut feeling.

I dont understand people voting for the same player multiple times in a row. Shouldn't it be just choose where you think someone is and not continue choosing your one guy until he is gone? Doesn't that kind of skew the results where prospects are getting votes missed and some who are getting more than others from one voter?

For example. I voted Ortio at number 3, but theres a good likelyhood he's closer to 10. I haven't been continuously voting him since then, I've been voting who I think is 4, 5 etc.. unless a player went earlier and I have to pick someone else. I'm just going by who I think slots where and moving on. Trying to boost one player so that it looks closer to what your opinion is isn't really the idea, at least in my mind.
__________________

Last edited by Coach; 07-18-2014 at 10:25 AM.
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:18 AM   #36
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Went Sieloff here. Just a gut feeling.
Really like Sieloff, love his game but man does he have a long road back. I almost just want to write him off completely then be pleasantly surprised if/when he makes the jump to the NHL.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:21 AM   #37
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

voted reinhart, guy will play, klimchuk has to prove it at the ahl level and his ceiling doesn't seem any higher than max's anyhow.
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2014, 10:26 AM   #38
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
voted reinhart, guy will play, klimchuk has to prove it at the ahl level and his ceiling doesn't seem any higher than max's anyhow.
Why doesn't Klimchuk's ceiling seem higher then Reinhart's?

If you watch either players, or followed them in junior, you can see that Klimchuk is the much better offensive player.

Reinhart had 21 goals in his draft year, Klimchuk had 36
As 18 year olds they put up similar numbers, but Klimchuk was fighting various injuries all. Reinhart played 71 games as an 18 year old, Klimchuk only played 57.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2014, 10:30 AM   #39
Joe Nieuwendyk
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
I dont understand people voting for the same player multiple times in a row. Shouldn't it be just choose where you think someone is and not continue choosing your one guy until he is gone? Doesn't that kind of skew the results where prospects are getting votes missed and some who are getting more than others from one voter?

For example. I voted Ortio at number 3, but theres a good likelyhood he's closer to 10. I haven't been continuously voting him since then, I've been voting who I think is 4, 5 etc.. unless a player went earlier and I have to pick someone else. I'm just going by who I think slots where and moving on. Trying to boost one player so that it looks closer to what your opinion is isn't really the idea, at least in my mind.
You should be voting who you think is the best prospect out of whoever is left, not trying to guess what everyone else will pick. If you thought Ortio was a better prospect than Klimchuk at 3, you should still think Ortio is a better prospect than Klimchuk at 6.
Joe Nieuwendyk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Joe Nieuwendyk For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2014, 10:34 AM   #40
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Nieuwendyk View Post
You should be voting who you think is the best prospect out of whoever is left, not trying to guess what everyone else will pick. If you thought Ortio was a better prospect than Klimchuk at 3, you should still think Ortio is a better prospect than Klimchuk at 6.
That makes no sense to me. The point of the poll is to see where the board's overall opinion lies to get a semi-accurate look at where our prospects rank. If this was to be a blind survey, done all at once where people order their picks, that would be the result I think we're trying to get here. Like voting for awards. People give first place, second place votes etc..

I look at like we all have a list of where we think prospects are, if we combined those lists, what would the rankings be? Voting for players multiple times skews that.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy