Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2014, 01:25 AM   #21
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

No Draisaitl? Maybe they're in the know on Edmonton's draft strategy and are 99.9% sure he's gone at #3?
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 02:42 AM   #22
TjRhythmic
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
No Draisaitl? Maybe they're in the know on Edmonton's draft strategy and are 99.9% sure he's gone at #3?
As soon as they started calling him the German Gretzky he became Oiler property
TjRhythmic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 03:08 AM   #23
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluck View Post
Pretty sure Katz showed him his bedroom. Isn't that how they get players to sign in Edmonton?
He's done it up really nicely. Nice fittings and whatnot.

How many days until this frickin draft? I'm ready to find out who the next saviour is going to be!
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 06:19 AM   #24
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
Treliving has a massive amount of experience in dealing with and evaluating young talent. Not only that, but he is able to develop them. At the STH meeting when talking about choosing new players, he got really intense. He said organizations shouldn't draft for what they need today or what they think they need in the future. They should draft the best player present and then develop that player in the best possible manner. If they needed a position today, they felt they should trade a well developed player for the best person in that position.
This, 1000 times this. each passing day I am feeling better and better about our management, and will trust what they do.
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:17 AM   #25
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
No Draisaitl? Maybe they're in the know on Edmonton's draft strategy and are 99.9% sure he's gone at #3?
Edmonton's draft strategy isn't exactly rocket science. Take BPA in 1st round and then go off the board from rounds 2 on.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:23 AM   #26
Burke Salad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Any word if Ritchie was in town as well, that could be a big tip off if he was?
Burke Salad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:27 AM   #27
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burke Salad View Post
Any word if Ritchie was in town as well, that could be a big tip off if he was?
Depends. If he's Ritchie's one out of four, well . If he's one out of eight, no big deal.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:39 AM   #28
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
How many would be upset if the Flames bypassed one of Bennett, Ekblad, Reinhart, and Draisatl with the #4 pick to draft Dal Colle? Or perhaps someone else who is expected to go lower but has high end potential?
Every time the Flames brass has listed the top prospects beyond the consensus 4, it's included Ritchie but not Dal Colle. Take that for what it's worth. I also have some inside info that management would consider Ritchie at 4 but not Dal Colle. Mods can PM for more details.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 07:40 AM   #29
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gartman View Post
I wish there was a "proposed trade" filter on cp.

Then I cab actually find remotely interesting tidbits after sifting through mounds of pure trash

Please just turn on your Xbox and play NHL
And stfu


Have good day

/rant off
Oh go home, gartman, you're drunk.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:44 AM   #30
Read Only
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
How many would be upset if the Flames bypassed one of Bennett, Ekblad, Reinhart, and Draisatl with the #4 pick to draft Dal Colle? Or perhaps someone else who is expected to go lower but has high end potential?
If they passed on one of the Sam's or Ekblad i would be surprised and disappointed.

Dal Colle over Draisatl I would be fine with and prefer actually.
Read Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:46 AM   #31
Hugh Jahrmes
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Hugh Jahrmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

If there is a Sam left and we take Ritchie I will get really drunk and angry
__________________
Long time listener, first time caller.
Hugh Jahrmes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hugh Jahrmes For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 07:47 AM   #32
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
Every time the Flames brass has listed the top prospects beyond the consensus 4, it's included Ritchie but not Dal Colle. Take that for what it's worth. I also have some inside info that management would consider Ritchie at 4 but not Dal Colle. Mods can PM for more details.
That's disappointing to hear
MDC>Ritchie IMO
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:52 AM   #33
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
That's disappointing to hear
MDC>Ritchie IMO
Not in my books, Ritchie has consistency issues and his skating isn't as good but he fights, hits, plays with an edge etc. Given how Treliving and Burke have reiterated that this team needs to play tougher in a brutal Western Conference this doesn't surprise me at all.

My "bottom 4" goes Draisaitl/Ritchie - MDC - Virtanen.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:08 AM   #34
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

There's different kinds of toughness, a guy like MDC is a Jeff Carter type. Being big and tough and resilient is good enough. You don't need Bertuzzi's and Lucics running around hitting goalies and punching people... IMO
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:15 AM   #35
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
There's different kinds of toughness, a guy like MDC is a Jeff Carter type. Being big and tough and resilient is good enough. You don't need Bertuzzi's and Lucics running around hitting goalies and punching people... IMO
Sure it's good enough, but we don't exactly have a lot of either types to have the liberty of an easy decision. And given the choice between a Carter and a Lucic in that situation, I'd personally take the Lucic and worry about Carter later - I'd want the intimidation factor in play.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:15 AM   #36
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
That's disappointing to hear
MDC>Ritchie IMO
Ritchie's size is what makes me want Ritchie more than MDC.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:37 AM   #37
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Ritchie's size is what makes me want Ritchie more than MDC.
You realize Dal Colle is one of the youngest players available in the draft and is already 6'2"? He's already much more naturally gifted of a player than Ritchie and will only get better as he fills out. If the Flames truly like Ritchie more then they are likely one of the very few teams that feel that way.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 08:40 AM   #38
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

This is McKeen's regional OHL scout:

Sean Lafortune @SeanLafortune · 15h
I honestly would not be shocked in the slightest if Nick Ritchie becomes the best player in the draft. Size, speed, lethal shot...

Sean Lafortune @SeanLafortune · 15h
...better possession player then given credit for and still a long way to go as far as long term potential.40 goal scorer with a mean streak
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2014, 08:40 AM   #39
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
You realize Dal Colle is one of the youngest players available in the draft and is already 6'2"? He's already much more naturally gifted of a player than Ritchie and will only get better as he fills out. If the Flames truly like Ritchie more then they are likely one of the very few teams that feel that way.
Good points.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:54 AM   #40
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
You realize Dal Colle is one of the youngest players available in the draft and is already 6'2"? He's already much more naturally gifted of a player than Ritchie and will only get better as he fills out. If the Flames truly like Ritchie more then they are likely one of the very few teams that feel that way.
I'm sorry if I offended you? You do realize people can have opinions, or else there would be no point of this forum in the first place.

Ritchie's size for his age is intriguing, nothing against MDC, but I feel like we already have him in Klimchuk (excluding the size). Ritchie offers something different that not very many teams have, a big bodied power forward like Lucic who can hit, fight and score. Ritchie has more of a package than MDC imo, he has a hell of a shot too.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy