Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Should the Flames re-sign Kevin Westgarth?
Yes, good fit in the dressing room 75 21.01%
Yes, would give a guy like Wolf a chance to season in Adirondack 53 14.85%
No, make room for youth or new blood 150 42.02%
No, he's rendundant with McGrattan 79 22.13%
Voters: 357. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2014, 08:34 AM   #21
Machiavelli
Franchise Player
 
Machiavelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I don't understand his role on the team, unlike McGrattan.

So, no.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
Machiavelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:36 AM   #22
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I said no because I would rather see his spot given to a younger player.

With that said, I wouldn't be upset if he is re-signed since he seems to play his role well.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:43 AM   #23
SHOGUN
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

No. He can't play.... and even then, he's not really a great fighter.
SHOGUN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SHOGUN For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2014, 08:48 AM   #24
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Westgarth kind of grew on me for some weird reason. I don't think he will be back, because I think he's hoping to get a contract out East......I won't be surprised if the Flames go out and sign a similar player though. A big, gritty 13th forward with NHL experience.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:48 AM   #25
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
I said no because I would rather see his spot given to a younger player.

With that said, I wouldn't be upset if he is re-signed since he seems to play his role well.
This is precisely why I want to see him back. Obviously he is not the most talented player ever to don the jersey.

But he understands what his role is and what he has to do to stay in the league. That makes him a good role model for the kids and a useful example for the coach.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:55 AM   #26
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I think a player like Westgarth is good to have, provided they can play the game as well. I would prefer to see that role taken over by a younger player full-time. To see a guy like Ferland or someone come in a take over this role while adding skill to the team would be a better option if possible.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 08:56 AM   #27
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

All the nay-sayers, have you not been listening to Burke? He wants 2 tough guys on the team, who else besides McGratton plays that role. Give him a 1 year deal, see hoe it goes. Lets Wolf play in the minors.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2014, 09:02 AM   #28
Igster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SHOGUN View Post
No. He can't play.... and even then, he's not really a great fighter.
This.

He's not much of a player and when he fights he tends to lose. Why would we want him on the team again?
Igster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:03 AM   #29
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igster View Post
This.

He's not much of a player and when he fights he tends to lose. Why would we want him on the team again?
He makes the 4th worst team in the NHL feel chummy.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:04 AM   #30
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

We need the two tough guys because the rest of the team is small, tiny, wee.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2014, 09:08 AM   #31
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
He makes the 4th worst team in the NHL feel chummy.
by that token, every player on the roster should be thrown out (throwing the team's record/results in like that).

the 4th line was generally a decent line, for their limited role, on most nights. Pretty sure the flames record was better, much better, after the westgarth acquisition. The guy got tuned pretty good in a few fights, but there he was dropping the gloves again when he was back in the lineup.

That fact alone makes him > jackman. I tend to agree that the flames need some bruisers to police the ice given that the size of the team is likely going to be on the smaller side again this year.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:08 AM   #32
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
All the nay-sayers, have you not been listening to Burke? He wants 2 tough guys on the team, who else besides McGratton plays that role. Give him a 1 year deal, see hoe it goes. Lets Wolf play in the minors.
That doesn't mean it has to be Westgarth.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:09 AM   #33
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn McgrattAn

It boggles my mind that people can't spell his name properly.

Anyways, continue with the Westgarth discussion please.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2014, 09:10 AM   #34
FlatLandFlamesFan
Scoring Winger
 
FlatLandFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: On the Bandwagon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
isn't that bouma?
Love Bouma , but he has no "nastiness" to his game , which IMHO would make him even more valuable
FlatLandFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:11 AM   #35
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
by that token, every player on the roster should be thrown out (throwing the team's record/results in like that).

the 4th line was generally a decent line, for their limited role, on most nights. Pretty sure the flames record was better, much better, after the westgarth acquisition. The guy got tuned pretty good in a few fights, but there he was dropping the gloves again when he was back in the lineup.

That fact alone makes him > jackman. I tend to agree that the flames need some bruisers to police the ice given that the size of the team is likely going to be on the smaller side again this year.
The Flames' 4th line played 4 minutes a night and got dummied every game.

McGrattan fills our "tough guy" quota just fine. Bad hockey player, but at least he's a good fighter.

Players like Bouma are who you want on the 4th line. Burke talks about being a 4 line team, it starts with icing players who can actually play hockey. Bouma isn't afraid to fight every now and then, but he's actually good at the sport.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:16 AM   #36
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Good guy, but not necessary. We can have BVB or Wolf play the odd game where we want a second big body to pair with McGrattan.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:19 AM   #37
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

love bouma but the guy isn't a fighter, nor is he as physical intimidating as westgarth. with the flames not having much size on the wings again this season, bouma likely playing 3rd line mins to add some hitting to the top 9. But he is NOT a fighter. He's had 2 fights in the last 2 years at the NHL level (compared to 13 by westgarth).

What games are you talking about where they got "dummied"? i thought for the most part the 4th line was rarely hemmed in their own zone or a major liability on the ice, regardless of their icetime.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:20 AM   #38
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
The Flames' 4th line played 4 minutes a night and got dummied every game.

McGrattan fills our "tough guy" quota just fine. Bad hockey player, but at least he's a good fighter.

Players like Bouma are who you want on the 4th line. Burke talks about being a 4 line team, it starts with icing players who can actually play hockey. Bouma isn't afraid to fight every now and then, but he's actually good at the sport.
McGrattan and Westgarth both actually averaged around 7 minutes a game, not sure where you're getting 4 minutes from.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 09:21 AM   #39
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Westgarth looked better than I thought he would. Makes guys like Wolf, Brabant and whomever else is fighting for those 4th line minutes at least a stepping stone. If they do, he can be the 13th forward, or be sent down to the Heat. Don't see it as any sort of an issue re-signing him.

By the sounds of it, I think Burke will want to utilize 2 guys that are in the heavyweight class at least as an option against certain teams. It is tough to argue with the product on the ice after that acquisition last year, of which I was not a fan of to begin with. Team did pretty well.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2014, 09:26 AM   #40
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Westgarth looked better than I thought he would. Makes guys like Wolf, Brabant and whomever else is fighting for those 4th line minutes at least a stepping stone. If they do, he can be the 13th forward, or be sent down to the Heat. Don't see it as any sort of an issue re-signing him.

By the sounds of it, I think Burke will want to utilize 2 guys that are in the heavyweight class at least as an option against certain teams. It is tough to argue with the product on the ice after that acquisition last year, of which I was not a fan of to begin with. Team did pretty well.
Pretty much this. Just sign the guy to a 1 year, 1m contract, it's not like any of us want him to a long term deal. He can be the 13/14th man, he doesn't even have to be playing unless someone gets injured or not earning their spot. When Jones was down last year, Brian got 3rd line minutes and Kevin got the 4th line RW spot. I saw no problem with it.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy