Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2014, 02:07 PM   #21
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

How about a nuclear surface to air missile?

We scrapped the Arrow for this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIM-10_Bomarc

SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 03:18 PM   #22
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Funny thing is that we really had all three. Canada had a stock of Nuclear Depth Charges, the Bomarc and we had purchased Honest John Surface to Surface missiles,
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 03:20 PM   #23
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

How about a nuclear fueled, ramjet powered supersonic low altitude missile (SLAM)?



Project Pluto was perhaps the most horrifying idea of the entire Cold War:

"SLAM was perhaps the most fearsome weapon ever conceived. The missile was designed to deliver as many as 26 nuclear bombs over the Soviet Union in a single mission. It would do this while flying at Mach 3 and less than 1,000 feet above ground level. SLAM’s shock wave overpressure alone (162 dB) would devastate structures and people along its flight path. And, as if that were not enough, the type’s nuclear-fueled ramjet would continuously spew radiation-contaminated exhaust all over the countryside."

Let that sink in, this thing would be conventionally launched and then at a safe distance and altitude the nuclear reactor would kick in and fuel the craft for an almost unlimited amount of time. The plan was for them to circle over the oceans until being ordered "down onto the deck" to make their dashes in the Soviet Union.

So not only does it deliver 26 nuclear warheads, but its speed and low altitude destroys buildings with its pressure wave and it spews out deadly radioactive exhaust along its path.

Jesus. If that doesn't send chills down your spine you are one cold operator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

http://blog.seattlepi.com/americanae...ile-from-hell/
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Old 03-10-2014, 06:24 PM   #24
Bindair Dundat
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Albert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Funny thing is that we really had all three. Canada had a stock of Nuclear Depth Charges, the Bomarc and we had purchased Honest John Surface to Surface missiles,
We also (at one point) had 7 squadrons of CF-104's (the other two [initially] were Tac Recon), which were tasked to deliver "tactical" Nukes in support of NATO. And don't forget the "Genie" armed CF-101 units (409, 416, and 425) which continued in service until 1983, carrying ("low-yield") "Nukes" over our own territory.
I made a couple of posts (which are now buried somewhere in this database) listing references for further reading on the whole matter.
I'm going to try and dig up the links. Worth reading, if the "Cold War era is something that interests you.
Bindair Dundat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 08:07 PM   #25
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bindair Dundat View Post
We also (at one point) had 7 squadrons of CF-104's (the other two [initially] were Tac Recon), which were tasked to deliver "tactical" Nukes in support of NATO. And don't forget the "Genie" armed CF-101 units (409, 416, and 425) which continued in service until 1983, carrying ("low-yield") "Nukes" over our own territory.
I made a couple of posts (which are now buried somewhere in this database) listing references for further reading on the whole matter.
I'm going to try and dig up the links. Worth reading, if the "Cold War era is something that interests you.


... And Nuc depth charges for the Argus antisubmarine patrols ( although the US navy held the keys for them)
para transit fellow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 11:50 PM   #26
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Low tech solutions.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 12:00 AM   #27
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
How about a nuclear fueled, ramjet powered supersonic low altitude missile (SLAM)?



Project Pluto was perhaps the most horrifying idea of the entire Cold War:

"SLAM was perhaps the most fearsome weapon ever conceived. The missile was designed to deliver as many as 26 nuclear bombs over the Soviet Union in a single mission. It would do this while flying at Mach 3 and less than 1,000 feet above ground level. SLAM’s shock wave overpressure alone (162 dB) would devastate structures and people along its flight path. And, as if that were not enough, the type’s nuclear-fueled ramjet would continuously spew radiation-contaminated exhaust all over the countryside."

Let that sink in, this thing would be conventionally launched and then at a safe distance and altitude the nuclear reactor would kick in and fuel the craft for an almost unlimited amount of time. The plan was for them to circle over the oceans until being ordered "down onto the deck" to make their dashes in the Soviet Union.

So not only does it deliver 26 nuclear warheads, but its speed and low altitude destroys buildings with its pressure wave and it spews out deadly radioactive exhaust along its path.

Jesus. If that doesn't send chills down your spine you are one cold operator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

http://blog.seattlepi.com/americanae...ile-from-hell/


I seriously lol'd reading at how ridiculously destructive this thing would have been.
pylon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 12:18 AM   #28
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bindair Dundat View Post
We also (at one point) had 7 squadrons of CF-104's (the other two [initially] were Tac Recon), which were tasked to deliver "tactical" Nukes in support of NATO. And don't forget the "Genie" armed CF-101 units (409, 416, and 425) which continued in service until 1983, carrying ("low-yield") "Nukes" over our own territory.
I made a couple of posts (which are now buried somewhere in this database) listing references for further reading on the whole matter.
I'm going to try and dig up the links. Worth reading, if the "Cold War era is something that interests you.
I picked up a book in the cheap bin called Learning to Love the Bomb, Canada's Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War by Sean Maloney. If you can find it, its an excellent book.
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 12:19 AM   #29
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
How about a nuclear fueled, ramjet powered supersonic low altitude missile (SLAM)?



Project Pluto was perhaps the most horrifying idea of the entire Cold War:

"SLAM was perhaps the most fearsome weapon ever conceived. The missile was designed to deliver as many as 26 nuclear bombs over the Soviet Union in a single mission. It would do this while flying at Mach 3 and less than 1,000 feet above ground level. SLAM’s shock wave overpressure alone (162 dB) would devastate structures and people along its flight path. And, as if that were not enough, the type’s nuclear-fueled ramjet would continuously spew radiation-contaminated exhaust all over the countryside."

Let that sink in, this thing would be conventionally launched and then at a safe distance and altitude the nuclear reactor would kick in and fuel the craft for an almost unlimited amount of time. The plan was for them to circle over the oceans until being ordered "down onto the deck" to make their dashes in the Soviet Union.

So not only does it deliver 26 nuclear warheads, but its speed and low altitude destroys buildings with its pressure wave and it spews out deadly radioactive exhaust along its path.

Jesus. If that doesn't send chills down your spine you are one cold operator.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

http://blog.seattlepi.com/americanae...ile-from-hell/
The old saying is if you pull the cork off of the nuclear genie, make it count. That weapon certainly would make it count.
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 09:39 AM   #30
firebug
Powerplay Quarterback
 
firebug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mayor of McKenzie Towne
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
Low tech solutions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-tank_dogs

Not recommended for animal lovers...
__________________
"Teach a man to reason, and he'll think for a lifetime"

~P^2
firebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 12:33 PM   #31
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maccalus View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav

This was one gun by the Germans that could actually fire from France to Britain and it was actually built and fired.

Not very practical though.
Found a picture of it. Not sure if it is Gustav or Dora though.

Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:00 PM   #32
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
The old saying is if you pull the cork off of the nuclear genie, make it count. That weapon certainly would make it count.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 03-12-2014, 01:24 PM   #33
Komskies
Franchise Player
 
Komskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I always thought this was a pretty interesting idea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System

Quote:
The Active Denial System (ADS) is a non-lethal, directed-energy weapon developed by the U.S. military,[1] designed for area denial, perimeter security and crowd control.[2] Informally, the weapon is also called the heat ray[3] since it works by heating the surface of targets, such as the skin of targeted human subjects. Raytheon is currently marketing a reduced-range version of this technology.[4] The ADS was deployed in 2010 with the United States military in the Afghanistan War, but was withdrawn without seeing combat.[5] On August 20, 2010, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department announced its intent to use this technology on prisoners in the Pitchess Detention Center in Los Angeles, stating its intent to use it in "operational evaluation" in situations such as breaking up prisoner fights.[6] The ADS is currently only a vehicle-mounted weapon, though U.S. Marines and police are both working on portable versions.[7] ADS was developed under the sponsorship of the DoD Non-Lethal Weapons Program with the Air Force Research Laboratory as the lead agency.[8][9] There are reports that Russia is developing its own version of the Active Denial System.[10]
Komskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy