02-07-2014, 08:20 PM
|
#21
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I enjoy watching the best players play against each other in a meaningful tournament. I also like the Olympic break in February. It's usually the worst part of the regular season anyways. If they won't go to the Olympics though, what I would like to see is a World Cup every 4 years but not the half assed tournament they held a couple of times. Here is what I would like to see:
- Rotation of the host country. Don't do it all over Europe and North America like the last two iterations.
- Hold the tournament in the middle of the NHL season for 2 or 3 weeks like the Olympics.
- Get rid of the All-Star Game. Instead, during non-World Cup years, hold qualification rounds during that time (so every year there are international games going on in February even if the WC isn't being held)
This format allows different players to represent their country and maybe develop chemistry for the main tournament. Essentially what I want to see is a soccer style world cup.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:25 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I don't believe all fans are on board. I'm not and I know I'm not alone. I would watch team Canada in the Olympics just as much if it was an amateur team as I would if it was the pros. I also personally don't like the drama of the choosing of players as I think it wears on players. I'm an NHL guy first and foremost and have never been a huge fan of professional athletes participating in the Olympics wether it be basketball, hockey or tennis.
|
So you're the guy who watches the Spengler Cup? Because that's pretty much what it would turn into with lesser players...but worse. It's all nice to cheer for amateurs, but who would these people be? College kids? Even the lesser hockey players who are in Europe get paid.
If there's no Olympics, then there will be a World Cup. At some point or another, tournaments like this are held and players have to be chosen and we all have to go through the media hype. Might as well be on the biggest winter sports stage there is, where you can help your country out with the medal count.
And as nice as the idea of amateur athletes are, I want to see the best athletes at the Olympics, not only the ones who can train and survive on their own dime. A lot of athletes are already living on a shoestring, now we should tell them that they can't make money off of their talents, while the Olympic committees rake in millions?
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
|
4X4,
apiquard,
Enoch Root,
greyshep,
iggypop,
RedHotC,
Stupid,
Vulcan,
woob,
Zevo,
_Q_
|
02-07-2014, 08:27 PM
|
#23
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
This is completely stupid of them to not allow NHL players to play. Totally selfish of the NHL. The olympics should be the best of the best competing. Canada and The U.S. would not have their best players at the olympics, while other countries still would. Having a 18 day break or whatever it is, in the middle of the season is not really that much of a big deal and in my opinion is worth it. Canada and U.S. would no longer be relevant at the hockey portion of the games.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:29 PM
|
#24
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
So you're the guy who watches the Spengler Cup? Because that's pretty much what it would turn into with lesser players...but worse. It's all nice to cheer for amateurs, but who would these people be? College kids? Even the lesser hockey players who are in Europe get paid.
If there's no Olympics, then there will be a World Cup. At some point or another, tournaments like this are held and players have to be chosen and we all have to go through the media hype. Might as well be on the biggest winter sports stage there is, where you can help your country out with the medal count.
And as nice as the idea of amateur athletes are, I want to see the best athletes at the Olympics, not only the ones who can train and survive on their own dime. A lot of athletes are already living on a shoestring, now we should tell them that they can't make money off of their talents, while the Olympic committees rake in millions?
|
well said
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:30 PM
|
#25
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in the belly of the beast.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_
I enjoy watching the best players play against each other in a meaningful tournament. I also like the Olympic break in February. It's usually the worst part of the regular season anyways. If they won't go to the Olympics though, what I would like to see is a World Cup every 4 years but not the half assed tournament they held a couple of times. Here is what I would like to see:
- Rotation of the host country. Don't do it all over Europe and North America like the last two iterations.
- Hold the tournament in the middle of the NHL season for 2 or 3 weeks like the Olympics.
- Get rid of the All-Star Game. Instead, during non-World Cup years, hold qualification rounds during that time (so every year there are international games going on in February even if the WC isn't being held)
This format allows different players to represent their country and maybe develop chemistry for the main tournament. Essentially what I want to see is a soccer style world cup.
|
If some owners already don,t like an interruption why would they be ok with changing the name of the tournament ? On top of that stopping EVERY year for a qualification round.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to trublmaker For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:31 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
If this is the case, I am disappointed.
Olympics should see the best of each country's players play for their nations pride.
Hockey does not have such an event. Soccer has got the world cup, Basketball sees the top players go to the Olympics. Football is not a world sport.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:35 PM
|
#27
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trublmaker
If some owners already don,t like an interruption why would they be ok with changing the name of the tournament ? On top of that stopping EVERY year for a qualification round.
|
Sure, but a tournament after the Stanley Cup Finals or before training camp is meaningless. Maybe an increase in NHL revenue from ticket sales and TV contracts for an event like this would change their minds.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:42 PM
|
#28
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in the belly of the beast.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_
Sure, but a tournament after the Stanley Cup Finals or before training camp is meaningless. Maybe an increase in NHL revenue from ticket sales and TV contracts for an event like this would change their minds.
|
If it was an international World Cup type event I'm not sure the nhl would get their hands on any revenues.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 08:47 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Only in NA would the owners be so greedy and self-centered that they would not let their players participate in the olympics. The players that participate in the olympics remember for the rest of their lives. February NHL hockey is forgotten by the time the regular season is over.
It boggles the mind that people are even talking about this. If European owners suggested it, the fans would just hang them and be done with it.
Also; for the longterm success of the sport, memorable events are worth 1000 more than regular season games.
Last edited by Itse; 02-07-2014 at 08:50 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
apiquard,
BACKCHECK!!!,
badger89,
devo22,
Enoch Root,
flamesfan1297,
Huntingwhale,
M*A*S*H 4077,
SixtySix,
The Swedish Flame,
vanisleflamesfan,
woob
|
02-07-2014, 08:52 PM
|
#30
|
Draft Pick
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit
I agree with the idea, and don't like the NHL disruption either, but to me the Olympics should be the best of the best, regardless of what their day job is.
|
Agree for the disruption. The Olympics is about being the best..not about what you do for a living.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:03 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
|
so how do the world juniors do?
I'd rather have professionals stay at home playing for money, this is suppose to be for love of their country.
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:06 PM
|
#32
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
The Olympics are supposed to be a celebration of amateur sport. NHL players are far from that.
I have no idea why the NHL got involved with the Olympics in the first place. Bring back the Canada Cup. Tell the IOC to go suck an egg.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mister Yamoto For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:06 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Only in NA would the owners be so greedy and self-centered that they would not let their players participate in the olympics. The players that participate in the olympics remember for the rest of their lives. February NHL hockey is forgotten by the time the regular season is over.
It boggles the mind that people are even talking about this. If European owners suggested it, the fans would just hang them and be done with it.
Also; for the longterm success of the sport, memorable events are worth 1000 more than regular season games.
|
so say you own a team and your star player and INVESTMENT gets hurt that hurts your team and investment.
just saying
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:15 PM
|
#34
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I would imagine that if the Olympics moved back to amateur athletes only, then Hockey would be nearly eliminated as a whole, along with other major sports.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to strombad For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:17 PM
|
#35
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SE Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PIMking
so say you own a team and your star player and INVESTMENT gets hurt that hurts your team and investment.
just saying
|
How is that different than your star player getting hurt in a NHL game?
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:19 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
How is that different than your star player getting hurt in a NHL game?
|
Because he got hurt under the contract that he signed with you and your investment that he is part of.
Personally I am just play devils advocate, I'd rather have amateurs playing because that's more pure to me than NHLers.
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PIMking For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:21 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
How is that different than your star player getting hurt in a NHL game?
|
The more games, the higher the risk of injury. If you're only getting reimbursed for 82 of them...
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:27 PM
|
#38
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PIMking
so how do the world juniors do?
I'd rather have professionals stay at home playing for money, this is suppose to be for love of their country.
|
Professionals love their country too
|
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:29 PM
|
#39
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
|
To me this seems pretty ridiculous.
So if this is true the NHL just looks like a bunch of whiny kids that got their candy and now want to take their ball and go home. There isn't a grey area about this, you're either in and or out.
When the NHL decided to send their pros to the games in Nagano they should have realized that they couldn't go back. So what will happen now, there will be five games where all the pros played and they'll go back to only amateurs... of course until the next time the games are on North American soil when all of a sudden the pros will play again.
I also find it really hard to feel bad for all the owners whining about the break that profited after the Vancouver games and having the US play Canada in the Gold medal game. I'm sure that game didn't attract any new fans to the game at all.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to c.t.ner For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-07-2014, 09:34 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
Honestly if you take out NHLers then I probably wouldn't really watch. I'd follow how it's going, but rarely tune in unless I'm already free. We already have the World Championships, Spengler Cup, World Juniors, U18's, which I enjoy, but Olympics should be the elite.
If it was going on every year I'd understand the no NHLers, but I want it to be the very best each country has to offer
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 PM.
|
|