Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2013, 03:19 PM   #21
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I thought this thread was going to be about Edmonton women.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 04:06 PM   #22
Redliner
Franchise Player
 
Redliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Conquering the world one 7-11 at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Wouldn't the Oilers' run of three firsts in three years and 10 first-rounders in the last seven make them an especially good team at tanking?
Nah. For it to be tanking, it has to be on purpose. In Edmonton's case, they're just an especially good team at sucking.
__________________
"There will be a short outage tonight sometime between 11:00PM and 1:00AM as network upgrades are performed. Please do not panic and overthrow society. Thank you."
Redliner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2013, 06:49 PM   #23
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redliner View Post
Nah. For it to be tanking, it has to be on purpose. In Edmonton's case, they're just an especially good team at sucking.
Actually if you check last seasons schedule they lost a bunch of 1 goal games at end of the season but were scoring lots of goals the month prior... Just sayin.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 12:42 AM   #24
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Worst tankers ever? With the Edmonton Oilers in the league? Call me when the Flames get one first pick overall, let alone three straight.
Worst tankers ever? Calgary Flames. Never had a top 5 pick draft pick.

Best tankers ever? Edmonton Oilers. #1 pick 3 years in a row (although technically the lottery helped them the one year they finished 2nd last).
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 01:15 AM   #25
dying4acup
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Exp:
Default

Karma sucks don't it. Because in the end I'd rather have Stamkos and McKinnon, or whoever goes #1 in the next draft, then the 3 losers Edmonton got. That said I would take hall anytime in a winning organization, but in Edmonton, his career will fail!
dying4acup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 01:47 AM   #26
stemit14
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dying4acup View Post
Karma sucks don't it. Because in the end I'd rather have Stamkos and McKinnon, or whoever goes #1 in the next draft, then the 3 losers Edmonton got. That said I would take hall anytime in a winning organization, but in Edmonton, his career will fail!
I'd rather have any of the 1st overall picks in the last ten years than the 3 guys that Edmonton got. Except for Eric Johnson in 2006. The true art of the oilers organization's tanking is in the fact that they've managed to be sooo bad for sooo long and not really get any better. Their picks outside of the first round have been terrible and they have just ignored their entire organizational depth for years. Their rebuild plan seems to be to finish last every season and fill every spot in their line up with the same type of player using that first pick... Meanwhile assuming the defense and goaltending would just work itself out.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 02:49 AM   #27
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
I'd rather have any of the 1st overall picks in the last ten years than the 3 guys that Edmonton got. Except for Eric Johnson in 2006. The true art of the oilers organization's tanking is in the fact that they've managed to be sooo bad for sooo long and not really get any better. Their picks outside of the first round have been terrible and they have just ignored their entire organizational depth for years. Their rebuild plan seems to be to finish last every season and fill every spot in their line up with the same type of player using that first pick... Meanwhile assuming the defense and goaltending would just work itself out.
I'd rather have Hall over Kane (I can't stand him, and really don't see him having the value we attribute him to having now without Toews) and Fleury too.

So a bit dramatic when that leaves you with MacKinnon (you can't honestly tell me at this point in his career you'd rather have Nate over Hall), Tavares, Stamkos, Crosby and Ovechkin. With the latter 4 are obvious improvements over the Oiler 3, I still get your point: The Oilers, with 3 of the last 10 1st overall picks have managed to miss out on the top 4 picks in the last decade. Impressively bad luck really.

Even funnier when you consider that the last team to draft 3 1st overall picks in a row was the Nordiques; who drafted Sundin, Nolan and Lindros. We all know how Lindros worked out, but still a great player at #1.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 06:48 AM   #28
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
That makes the oilers the best tankers ever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Wouldn't the Oilers' run of three firsts in three years and 10 first-rounders in the last seven make them an especially good team at tanking?
Depends on the definition or use of the word worst. Worst can sometimes mean best, and in this instance I think the writer was saying the Flames are doing their best to tank by icing the worst lineup possible. He's also saying that the Flames are the worst in hiding the fact they are trying to make their best attempt to secure that high draft pick. Isn't English a fun language!
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 06:57 AM   #29
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Depends on the definition or use of the word worst. Worst can sometimes mean best, and in this instance I think the writer was saying the Flames are doing their best to tank by icing the worst lineup possible. He's also saying that the Flames are the worst in hiding the fact they are trying to make their best attempt to secure that high draft pick. Isn't English a fun language!
He's suggesting that they're so inept, even when trying to tank, they can't do it right.
But he's wrong, as we're neither trying to tank, nor actually tanking.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 07:23 AM   #30
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Are the loser Oilers gonna end up with Sam Reinhart too?
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 07:31 AM   #31
trublmaker
First Line Centre
 
trublmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in the belly of the beast.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Depends on the definition or use of the word worst. Worst can sometimes mean best, and in this instance I think the writer was saying the Flames are doing their best to tank by icing the worst lineup possible. He's also saying that the Flames are the worst in hiding the fact they are trying to make their best attempt to secure that high draft pick. Isn't English a fun language!
I think he's saying that "management" is trying to tank EXCEPT the team is winning instead of losing ergo the worst tank job.
trublmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to trublmaker For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2013, 07:35 AM   #32
BigRed
#1 Goaltender
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Wouldn't the Oilers' run of three firsts in three years and 10 first-rounders in the last seven make them an especially good team at tanking?
Gifted, even. Some might even say "special."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again
BigRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:06 AM   #33
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Depends on the definition or use of the word worst. Worst can sometimes mean best, and in this instance I think the writer was saying the Flames are doing their best to tank by icing the worst lineup possible. He's also saying that the Flames are the worst in hiding the fact they are trying to make their best attempt to secure that high draft pick. Isn't English a fun language!
That's where you look at context. It's easy to see which was meant after reading the thread and article.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:32 AM   #34
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

These five picks of the Oilers (Hall, RNH, Yak, Nurse, Eckblad) hopefully turn out similar to the Sens from 1992-1996 (Yashin at 2, Daigle at 1, Bonk at 3, Berard at 1, and Philips at 1).
albertGQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:36 AM   #35
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
These five picks of the Oilers (Hall, RNH, Yak, Nurse, Eckblad) hopefully turn out similar to the Sens from 1992-1996 (Yashin at 2, Daigle at 1, Bonk at 3, Berard at 1, and Philips at 1).
That's pretty much the best case scenario at this point for the Oilers.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:37 AM   #36
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Berard was a pretty good pick and Philips is a solid defender too. I hope more for Ekblad, he seems like a good kid and I don't wish the oilers on anyone.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:56 AM   #37
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Oilers with 3 first over all picks in a row is the benchmark for tanking
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 10:43 AM   #38
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

The thing is our success rate can't be maintained. Our shooting % is way to high to be sustainable so we will come back to earth sooner rather than later. However I have been enjoying the ride.

We will still miss the playoffs this year but at least this team is fun to watch. This performance so far bodes really well for the future.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 12:37 PM   #39
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
The thing is our success rate can't be maintained. Our shooting % is way to high to be sustainable so we will come back to earth sooner rather than later. However I have been enjoying the ride.

We will still miss the playoffs this year but at least this team is fun to watch. This performance so far bodes really well for the future.
Agreed, that shooting percentage is absolutely unsustainable. I think, however, that our special teams will improve as the season goes on; particularly the penalty kill. Also having Cammalleri back at some point should improve the power play (although it hasn't been terrible barring the first couple games).
Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 12:41 PM   #40
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Oilers have made an art form of tanking.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy