Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2013, 08:14 PM   #21
cowtown75
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cowtown75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Airdrie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavahliers View Post
No ones a fit for Calgary, because the flames suck
That was a pretty intelligent comment, what are you, twelve-teen ?
cowtown75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2013, 08:31 PM   #22
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

It amazes me that anyone has time in their life to do this kind of stuff...both pathetic and humorous at the same time...and very very telling of the maturity level.

Awesome.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2013, 08:37 PM   #23
Jebus
Scoring Winger
 
Jebus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Flames Country
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Not to pick on you specifically, but I simply dont understand the desire of so many to get rid of Stempniak.

yeah he isnt a young guy anymore, but he isnt "old" either. The Flames are re-building true...but you still need solid character guys who have experience in what it takes to play in the NHL. He is a perfect example of this in that he was a bit of a longshot to even make the show. Not only did he make it, he is a contributor in all phases of the game. He is on a very reasonable contract and seems like a quiet leader on a team with a need for that.

Just my 2 cents.
I don't feel it's a burning desire to rid ourselves of Stempniak, more an issue of continued asset management as it contributes to the rebuild. It's unlikely that on deadline day the Flames will have a lineup of teams looking to auction the likes of stajan, Stempniak, jackman, Cammy, etc. to the highest bidder. That said, I think we should certainly be prepared to field offers that promote the future of this franchise. If that means Stempniak goes based on market demand, so be it. While I would prefer to ditch stajan and Cammy and keep Stempniak moving forward, I don't want to pass by the deadline without adding future assets. If no one is buying what we are selling, we may have to add to the available list.
I completely agree with your desire to keep Stempniak through the rebuild process if he is agreeable. I simply see him as our most desirable asset come deadline day.
Jebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2013, 12:01 PM   #24
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I would be ok with this if we could move Cammi or Stempniak but that is the only way. I would like to get a top4 dman out of a trade like this if we did. We have enough guys to move one of them or two of them to obtain that.

Brunner would fit in nicely, give him a 1 year contract and see how it goes.
foshizzle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy