Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-06-2013, 09:33 AM   #21
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Khudubin. We're paying non-nhl tested guys more then a guy whos ready to be a star in the nhl. Canes got him for only 800K.
Khudobin is the guy I'm disappointed in as well... He would have come in and claimed #1 status here and kept it, IMO...and for cheap.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:36 AM   #22
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
If McGratton can play 9 minutes a game and move up to the 3rd line occasionally when needed.

O'Brien being on the ice 15-18 minutes a game is much more of a Jackman replacement than McGratton.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:44 AM   #23
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skudr248 View Post
Really want the flames to sign brunner .. High skill and potential
And yet Detroit who brought him over and broke him into the NHL playing him on a line with Zetterberg had 5.5M for 40 year old Alfredsson (who had virtually the same regular season and play stats as Brunner) and 4.8 m /yr for 5 years for Jokinen's successor, coming off an injury in Florida .. (30 year old Wiess) didn't sign him.

You can almost hear Detroit hollering PASS on Brunner.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:44 AM   #24
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
If McGratton can play 9 minutes a game and move up to the 3rd line occasionally when needed.

O'Brien being on the ice 15-18 minutes a game is much more of a Jackman replacement than McGratton.
Huh? Jackman is a forward, and O'Brien is a D-man, not really comparable or inter-changable. And other that his 1st year here when he had a relative offensive explosion, Jackman's role has become obsolete with McGrattan around. McGrattan is a better fighter/agitator/goon/protector.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:45 AM   #25
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

No, none.

Khudobin would have been a decent pick up, but I am not sure that he is better than what we have, or that he would even sign with us over Carolina.

I am a little disappointed that we didn't sign Fistric over Russell. I think a big and strong depth defenseman like him would have been a better option than Russell, another small defenseman, and he would have been a good replacement for Sarich. Maybe they tried, I don't know... but I don't see the room for him now.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 07-06-2013, 10:03 AM   #26
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Huh? Jackman is a forward, and O'Brien is a D-man, not really comparable or inter-changable. And other that his 1st year here when he had a relative offensive explosion, Jackman's role has become obsolete with McGrattan around. McGrattan is a better fighter/agitator/goon/protector.
The point is that O'Brien and Jackman will be on the ice more than McGratton and likely be dressed for more games. When they are on it does not necessarily mean there is going to be a fight. It will not be quite the panic there will be when McGratton is on the ice and the Flames ice the puck.


Love McGrattan on the Flames but everyone has their roles.

Jackman has well over 2 hit/game every season and has missed 13 games since he became a Flame.

McGrattan, since he left Ottawa has a season high 34 games in 2009-10 where he had 16 hits in 34 games for the Flames.

Totally different roles and Jackman was forced to try to cover McGrattan's role as the Flames went sissy on us over the last 2-3 years,

Last edited by ricardodw; 07-06-2013 at 09:39 PM. Reason: McGrattan not McGratton
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 10:13 AM   #27
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

We have a really mean team that we are assembling. Will be fun to watch next year though a bottom five position is a likely outcome. This team is finally exciting for me again though, lots of new faces, lots of internal prospects and some bigger bodies coming in to camp. Should be a fun year! Hoping we don't miss out on Brunner though. Really wanna see us flip Stemps to bring in Brunner and I feel Stemps is easily worth a 2nd round pick to a team. Phoenix could use a top 9 piece to fill out their line-up, could see them wanting Stempniak back.

Brunner is in that apex area right now, is a fellow countrymen of Sven's, listed as a center on HDB and nhl.com but is a right handed shot and could slide in on the right side. So many things about his game and where he's at in his career that make sense for the Flames. He's a top 6 piece that I think Feaster NEEDS to target and I hope he is.

Last edited by Heavy Jack; 07-06-2013 at 10:20 AM.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 10:24 AM   #28
Ruttiger
First Line Centre
 
Ruttiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Exp:
Default

[QUOTE=FlamesAddictio
I am a little disappointed that we didn't sign Fistric over Russell. I think a big and strong depth defenseman like him would have been a better option than Russell, another small defenseman, and he would have been a good replacement for Sarich. Maybe they tried, I don't know... but I don't see the room for him now.[/QUOTE]

I wonder about Fistric. I thought he was exactly the type of depth d-man the Oilers needed last year. But it turned out he couldn't regularly crack the lineup of a team with one of the weaker defense cores in the league. Not sure if it says more about Krueger or Fistric, but that's now 2 teams that have moved out the former first rounder for minimal to no return.
Ruttiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 10:54 AM   #29
Yanda
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Yanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

I dont understand the outrage over the Ramo signing. We have one of the cheapest goaltending tandems in the league and where way under the salary cap.

The term is only 2 years so the signing doesnt effect Gillies or Brossiot.
Yanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:03 AM   #30
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanda View Post
I dont understand the outrage over the Ramo signing. We have one of the cheapest goaltending tandems in the league and where way under the salary cap.

The term is only 2 years so the signing doesnt effect Gillies or Brossiot.

Don't think posters mind the Ramo signing but the money is a factor. Feaster can say that its an open battle for goaltending positions all he wants. When you pay one of the goaltenders $2.7 million, he is pretty much assured to be starting with the big club. The battle now is for the other spot with MacD , Otrio, and Berra. Considering that Ramo does not have much experience in the NHL its hard to imagine that they will want another goalie with no experience in tandem. Also GM's can say what ever they want, but a 1 way contract 99% of the time is picked over the 2 way contract.

I agree that 2 years does not effect Gilles or Brossoit. That said those 2 are more than 2 years away.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:13 AM   #31
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Khudubin. We're paying non-nhl tested guys more then a guy whos ready to be a star in the nhl. Canes got him for only 800K.
By going with our own guys, we get to see if they're good, we don't spend needlessly, and if they suck...we get a good draft pick!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:36 AM   #32
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
The point is that O'Brien and Jackman will be on the ice more than McGratton and likely be dressed for more games. When they are on it does not necessarily mean there is going to be a fight. It will not be quite the panic there will be when McGratton is on the ice and the Flames ice the puck.


Love McGratton on the Flames but everyone has their roles.

Jackman has well over 2 hit/game every season and has missed 13 games since he became a Flame.

McGratton, since he left Ottawa has a season high 34 games in 2009-10 where he had 16 hits in 34 games for the Flames.

Totally different roles and Jackman was forced to try to cover McGratton's role as the Flames went sissy on us over the last 2-3 years,

I think you might be undervaluing McGrattan a little. His primary role is as a"goon" however he scored at a pace of 12 points over 82 games vs. Jackman's 10. While he appeared in half as many games as Jackman, mainly due to being acquired in March, his TOI is a whole 30 seconds less than Jackman's (7:36 vs. 7:06) and has a profoundly better career +/- at -5 vs. Jackman's -57. No one is going to mistake either guy for a point-getting forward, but McGrattan is a much better fighter/agitator and on the rare occasion he scores some points, he still out-produces Jackman. I wager McGrattan gets into more games than Jackman next year.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:39 AM   #33
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood View Post
Karri Ramo is younger than Khudobin, and has played a lot more NHL games

Since when was Khudobin "ready to be a star"? He was signed to be a back up
He's seeing an opportunity in Carolina, Ward has been declining and was hurt last year. THis is a chance for him to beat out Ward for more playing time. Watch him play, he should be a starter.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:46 AM   #34
return to the red
Franchise Player
 
return to the red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
I think you might be undervaluing McGrattan a little. His primary role is as a"goon" however he scored at a pace of 12 points over 82 games vs. Jackman's 10. While he appeared in half as many games as Jackman, mainly due to being acquired in March, his TOI is a whole 30 seconds less than Jackman's (7:36 vs. 7:06) and has a profoundly better career +/- at -5 vs. Jackman's -57. No one is going to mistake either guy for a point-getting forward, but McGrattan is a much better fighter/agitator and on the rare occasion he scores some points, he still out-produces Jackman. I wager McGrattan gets into more games than Jackman next year.
This is no place for logic and stats
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
return to the red is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to return to the red For This Useful Post:
Old 07-06-2013, 02:10 PM   #35
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
I think you might be undervaluing McGrattan a little. His primary role is as a"goon" however he scored at a pace of 12 points over 82 games vs. Jackman's 10. While he appeared in half as many games as Jackman, mainly due to being acquired in March, his TOI is a whole 30 seconds less than Jackman's (7:36 vs. 7:06) and has a profoundly better career +/- at -5 vs. Jackman's -57. No one is going to mistake either guy for a point-getting forward, but McGrattan is a much better fighter/agitator and on the rare occasion he scores some points, he still out-produces Jackman. I wager McGrattan gets into more games than Jackman next year.
So after 7 years and at age 31 this is McGratton's break out year as a player?

who is our first line d- pairing? Who gets to play with Cundari -- 1 goal 3 pts in 4 games......Its been a while since the Flames have had a 20 goal 60 pt D-man over the full season.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 02:19 PM   #36
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Who did we miss out on? There's players I liked that signed elsewhere but I don't feel too strongly about anyone of them being missed out on by the Flames.
The players I am hoping for are still available and am still hoping one lands here.
My eyes are on the RFA crop. There's going to be something there to be had in the next week or so. Glad the Flames stayed low key yesterday.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-06-2013, 03:52 PM   #37
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
So after 7 years and at age 31 this is McGratton's break out year as a player?

who is our first line d- pairing? Who gets to play with Cundari -- 1 goal 3 pts in 4 games......Its been a while since the Flames have had a 20 goal 60 pt D-man over the full season.

Where did I ever say he was going to 'break out" this year? I was simply showing that aside from Jackman's 1st year here, he hasn't out-produced McGrattan statistically and is a far more feared fighter than Jackman. Jackman averages more hits/GP and McGrattan averages more fights/GP. The goon role is likely McGrattan's to lose.

Why do you keep trying to bring up the D? It has absolutely no bearing on Jackman or McGrattan's ice time. And as an aside, there is no way Cundari is on the 1st pairing, as it currently stands. Maybe if he has a fantastic camp but it's almost guaranteed to be 2 of Brodie, Gio, Wideman on the first pair.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 06:51 PM   #38
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Where did I ever say he was going to 'break out" this year? I was simply showing that aside from Jackman's 1st year here, he hasn't out-produced McGrattan statistically and is a far more feared fighter than Jackman. Jackman averages more hits/GP and McGrattan averages more fights/GP. The goon role is likely McGrattan's to lose.

Why do you keep trying to bring up the D? It has absolutely no bearing on Jackman or McGrattan's ice time. And as an aside, there is no way Cundari is on the 1st pairing, as it currently stands. Maybe if he has a fantastic camp but it's almost guaranteed to be 2 of Brodie, Gio, Wideman on the first pair.
Sorry for being subtle.

I meant to say that you are using a very small sample to show that McGratton is a productive offensive player.




Using an even smaller sample (to illustrate my point) Cundari was the most productive Flames D-man from per game perspective.

The reason Jackman gets more hits is because he is out there to play the hockey game. McGratton doesn't hit as much because most of his time on the ice is sending a warning and setting up a fight....... a very important job. He doesn't have the skating ability to consistently deliver significant hits or he would be getting paid 2M / year like Booguard..
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:01 PM   #39
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
They are getting paid what they are worth. They are hard to play against and the Flames are short of that commodity.

Both are 28.

If Jackman gets hurt to the point he can't play hard or fight there are no other players in the Flames org to take his role.
I'd take Ryan Jones over both, thanks
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:17 PM   #40
nightfx
Scoring Winger
 
nightfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Flames should have signed Ramp for less because when you sign players, YOU choose the amount and then sign them. $750k would have been the smarter signing, since that is a lesser number than what we signed him for.
Ramo would just stay in the KHL then.
nightfx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nightfx For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy