07-03-2013, 09:54 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool
This Shinkaruk discussion has to be one of the dumbest things in this year's draft. I honestly can't wrap my head around why people are so hung up on this one player and pretend to know exactly who a team should pick in the late first round. It's weird.
|
Yup. And it's even more bizarre when you factor in that maybe 10 teams passed him from his expected position, yet the only team taking any heat for that fact is the Flames.
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 09:58 PM
|
#22
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool
This Shinkaruk discussion has to be one of the dumbest things in this year's draft. I honestly can't wrap my head around why people are so hung up on this one player and pretend to know exactly who a team should pick in the late first round. It's weird.
|
If Detroit or Boston passed on a hometown kid they wouldn't make this big of a fuss about it and there are far fewer NHL players from those areas.
It's simply because they're the Calgary Flames. The same reason TSN analysts tore Feaster to shreds for going off the board and then 5 minutes later they commend other GM's for doing the same thing.
Fact is, the national media hates the Calgary Flames. Anyone that tries to say otherwise is simply being delusional.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Hells Bells For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:00 PM
|
#23
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool
This Shinkaruk discussion has to be one of the dumbest things in this year's draft. I honestly can't wrap my head around why people are so hung up on this one player and pretend to know exactly who a team should pick in the late first round. It's weird.
|
Here's the thing: If Shinkaruk ends up being better than Poirier, there is a legitimate gripe because consensus was that, regardless of precisely where you thought they would go, Shinkaruk was the more solid pick.
Now, if Shinkaruk and Poirier end up even, that's a win for Calgary because they took a guy offboard who they wanted and I'll be damned if they weren't justified in doing so.
But, if Shinkaruk ends up being better than Poirier, then the hindsight discussion is about how it wasn't hindsight at the time to pick Shinkaruk over the less highly touted Poirier.
I don't think that's irrational at all. I think attempting to claim a winner at this point is.
Based on the sweet-sweet youtube clips of this Poirier guy, I am more excited to watch him develop (or not) than I would be a guy like Shinkaruk with obvious tools and the question of 'does he put it together at the NHL level'.
There is definitely an argument to be made though if Poirier doesn't turn out and Shinkaruk does. Flimsy, maybe, but it's a legit.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:06 PM
|
#24
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I love it....
Calgary picks 6th, Edmonton 7th, Vancouver 9th. Who will be the better player long term? Monahan, Nurse or Horvat?
Then the Poirier vs. Shinkaruk debate (which I think is all BS) between Calgary and Vancouver.
Should heat up the rivalries in Western Canada nicely.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:06 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Here's the thing: If Shinkaruk ends up being better than Poirier, there is a legitimate gripe because consensus was that, regardless of precisely where you thought they would go, Shinkaruk was the more solid pick.
Now, if Shinkaruk and Poirier end up even, that's a win for Calgary because they took a guy offboard who they wanted and I'll be damned if they weren't justified in doing so.
But, if Shinkaruk ends up being better than Poirier, then the hindsight discussion is about how it wasn't hindsight at the time to pick Shinkaruk over the less highly touted Poirier.
I don't think that's irrational at all. I think attempting to claim a winner at this point is.
Based on the sweet-sweet youtube clips of this Poirier guy, I am more excited to watch him develop (or not) than I would be a guy like Shinkaruk with obvious tools and the question of 'does he put it together at the NHL level'.
There is definitely an argument to be made though if Poirier doesn't turn out and Shinkaruk does. Flimsy, maybe, but it's a legit.
|
Of course afterwards when the players are mature you can evaluate the picks, but even then there are dozens of players to take into account, not just this one guy who people are obsessed with for whatever reason.
I think sometimes media people act childish when someone who they thought was highly valued gets passed on by teams.
While Mckenzie practically predicted that Florida might take a center too, Pierre McGuire acted like not picking Jones was a personal insult against him. Some of these people are a little weird.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Henry Fool For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:17 PM
|
#26
|
I believe in the Jays.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitsilano
|
So ridiculous. Buffalo had two picks in the first round, and obviously passed on Shinkaruk twice. Winnipeg had a chance at 13, passed on Shinkaruk. Columbus, 2 picks in the first round, also decided Shinkaruk wasn't worthy of those picks. Detroit at 20, passed on Shinkaruk. All of these teams "did better" than Calgary.
None of it makes sense and this ganging up on Feaster and the Flames is getting a little out of hand IMO.
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to flames_fan_down_under For This Useful Post:
|
BBQorMILDEW,
Burner,
DaQwiz,
Diemenz,
FLAMESRULE,
foshizzle11,
Geeoff,
handgroen,
Hitman88,
Jay Random,
Nandric,
Neeper,
slybomb,
Vulcan
|
07-03-2013, 10:24 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
I'd go....
1. Buffalo
2. Columbus
3. Calgary
4. Colorado
Avs based just on getting Mackinnon, really, though they got a promising D in the 2nd round as well.
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:31 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool
This Shinkaruk discussion has to be one of the dumbest things in this year's draft. I honestly can't wrap my head around why people are so hung up on this one player and pretend to know exactly who a team should pick in the late first round. It's weird.
|
Even weirder that it seems to be fueled greatly because he's from Calgary... As if Calgary made a mistake not drafting player just because he's from there... I wonder which BC boy Vancouver so brutally ignored at the draft
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:35 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
Shouldn't Washington be taking heat for passing on the mighty Shinkaruk? I mean, they're the ones who actually picked before the Canucks.
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:36 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
I think it's valid to rate the teams already ... for me, it's easy... I simply look at the players drafted and ask myself which group of players would I be most excited about had the Flames drafted them...based in that criteria, the Flames did really well
Last edited by PlayfulGenius; 07-03-2013 at 10:52 PM.
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:37 PM
|
#31
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
From what I was told, Calgary passed up on Shinkaruk because he supposely has an attitude problem and plus even if he did get drafted by the Flames he would have pulled an Erixon or a criag anderson..
__________________
CPHL Dallas Stars
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:38 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Shouldn't Washington be taking heat for passing on the mighty Shinkaruk? I mean, they're the ones who actually picked before the Canucks.
|
This ridiculous media coverage has me strongly cheering against Shinkaruk...I hope he's a total bust while also getting many seasons worth of Top 6 duty for the Canucks
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 10:41 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
What could have been versus what will be…the curious draft day of the Calgary Flames
|
This message brought to you three days after the draft.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mrdonkey For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-03-2013, 11:13 PM
|
#34
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the RR diner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
If Detroit or Boston passed on a hometown kid they wouldn't make this big of a fuss about it and there are far fewer NHL players from those areas.
It's simply because they're the Calgary Flames. The same reason TSN analysts tore Feaster to shreds for going off the board and then 5 minutes later they commend other GM's for doing the same thing.
Fact is, the national media hates the Calgary Flames. Anyone that tries to say otherwise is simply being delusional.
|
It is hard to come to any other conclusion, really. Fact is, both Buffalo and Columbus also passed on Shinkaruk twice and they are both getting praised up the yin yang. Don't know why drafting "hometown kids" has anything to do with building a successful team.
__________________
Harry, I'm gonna let you in on a little secret. Every day, once a day, give yourself a present. Don't plan it, don't wait for it, just... let it happen. Could be a new shirt at the men's store, a catnap in your office chair, or... two cups of good, hot, black coffee.
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 11:26 PM
|
#35
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by t0rrent98
even if he did get drafted by the Flames he would have pulled an Erixon or a criag anderson..
|
a tad over-dramatic?
__________________
is your cat doing singing?
|
|
|
07-03-2013, 11:58 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Elbows Up!!
|
The other big pass by was Seth Jones by Colorado; they felt at their spot that there was a BPA for them and for their team. Are these so called rankings freaking out about not taking a Colorado player? Exactly. They aren't.
But somehow the flames are getting whacked about the exact same thing.
Would it matter if our 22 pick was in 28 spot? It shouldn't, but I bet it does.
Besides that, if I was Poirier I would be even more motivated!
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player
Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.
|
|
|
07-04-2013, 12:42 AM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells
Fact is, the national media hates the Calgary Flames. Anyone that tries to say otherwise is simply being delusional.
|
It's not just the national media, the idiots on FAN960 won't shut up about it either. Just because they gushed about him in their mock draft they think he must have been the BPA. Keep in mind they also picked Horvat for the Flames at #6. Thanks but I'll put my faith in the actual scouts who make a living evaluating talent over some media hacks who just read central scouting reports and treat it as gospel.
|
|
|
07-04-2013, 12:52 AM
|
#38
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
I wasn't sold on Poirier until i did some research but now I am stoked. Also read an article on the herald prior to the draft where Janko said he is 190 pounds now. That is 20 lbs in a year and he is not 19 until September. He is a better prospect than most non-flames fans give him credit for. Feaster and the flames scouts have had 3 promising drafts hopefully it translates into NHL success soon
|
20 lbs in one year at his height, age, and the amount of cardio he does is seriously impressive. Shows commitment.
|
|
|
07-04-2013, 01:50 AM
|
#39
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Maybe the media hates that Calgary passed on Shinkaruk because it would've been a story they could've milked from now until he retired. Hometown kid gets picked the year the Flames lose Iginla and attempts to lead them to the promised land. (Completely ignoring the fact the Flames selected Monahan ahead of him.)
We would've seen " Home-grown talent Hunter Shinkaruk" in the headlines for the next 15 years.
__________________

|
|
|
07-04-2013, 02:00 AM
|
#40
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cgy
|
Shinkaruk dropped because of his psycho father, he used to pad his sons stats when he was the scorekeeper in minor hockey, he was busted and was banned for working the penalty box from peewee on.
On top of this hunter got to play on the first line in med hat his rookie season ( which unheard of) got to join the under 18 team, after his whl team was eliminated ( no other kid has been added to the team that late in the tourney in it's history,) and not to mention it has been rumors that his dad bribed royals coaches in bantam and midget)
There is very good reasons why the flames passed on him.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dienasty For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 PM.
|
|