Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-27-2013, 11:32 AM   #21
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

I wonder to what extent a service like Car2Go might make sense for this, if the technology was there. You've got a large enough base that mass implementation would actually be significant, the people driving the cars probably aren't as attached to the experience of driving and view it primarily as a convenience, and if you could convince insurance that the automated model is actually safer, then the savings might be significant enough for the company that it's worth implementing. To me, that's the most likely mass implementation scenario, rather than a large number of individual drivers deciding that this is a must-have feature.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
Old 05-27-2013, 11:33 AM   #22
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Bus transit is cheaper too.
Bus transit is not point to point, nor do you have a vehicle to use at your destination. Further, bus transit is scheduled. It's not at all the same thing.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 12:29 PM   #23
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIP MAN View Post
The QE2 is the closest you can get to auto pilot. Definitely helps kill time with that boring drive.
They don't call you LIP MAN for nothing.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 01:23 PM   #24
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies View Post
Bus transit is not point to point, nor do you have a vehicle to use at your destination. Further, bus transit is scheduled. It's not at all the same thing.
Oh I agree, I was countering the assertion that the indignities of being behind the wheel would be the reason for the adoption of air travelers to self drive cars. I think the convenience might, but air travel will always be preferable to most business travelers who need time.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 03:17 PM   #25
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies View Post
Bus transit is not point to point, nor do you have a vehicle to use at your destination. Further, bus transit is scheduled. It's not at all the same thing.
With driverless cars, someone could invent a system that would sort of be a hybrid between a taxi service and a transit service - all computer controlled.

It could pick you up where you are at, make quick stops to pick up others along the way, perhaps drop you off somewhere to get on a different vehicle going in a different direction, that would only be a minute away from picking you up, and would eventually drop you off right where you needed to be.

Implemented properly, it could be faster than driving is now, take you point to point, and still essentially be "public transit"

A place that had 100% computer controlled cars that were all logged into the same system, or could communicate with one another would eliminate the need for traffic lights, and probably most interchanges. It might be a little nerve racking at first for the occupants, but vehicles could zoom through intersections at high speeds, missing cars travelling across their path at high speeds by mere inches. The concept of lanes could go away too, as each car could be several inches apart driving beside each other. Three or four vehicles could fit side by side onto existing two lane roads.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy