Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2013, 09:00 AM   #21
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

What if they traded their 1st round pick + The Nuge (or something similar) to Nashville for Shea Weber? Edmonton immediately gets that #1 stud defenseman and Nashville enters a full on rebuild with the 4th and 5th picks and draft Barkov + Nurse or Barkov + Nichushkin.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:04 AM   #22
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin View Post
What if they traded their 1st round pick + The Nuge (or something similar) to Nashville for Shea Weber? Edmonton immediately gets that #1 stud defenseman and Nashville enters a full on rebuild with the 4th and 5th picks and draft Barkov + Nurse or Barkov + Nichushkin.
And then Edmonton's #1 centre is Sam Gagner.

That team made a huge mistake picking Yakupov when Galchenyuk was on the board.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:07 AM   #23
Muffins
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Muffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Neither here nor there
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
And then Edmonton's #1 centre is Sam Gagner.

That team made a huge mistake picking Yakupov when Galchenyuk was on the board.
What do you expect from a team whose scouting consists of picking the guy whose on the cover of the draft magazine.
__________________
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity" -Abraham Lincoln
Muffins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Muffins For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:10 AM   #24
comrade
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Edmonton has reached the Bouwmeester dilemma.... They have great players who are losers.

They won't win with them and very soon they will be only able to get a 15th round pick and a couple of prospects for them.

They like the Flames will be better when they finally bite the bullet and get rid of them.

They have a harder problem..... other than Gagner.... who has been a Oiler for 6 years now and "led" has not won any games for them.... it is harder to identify the problem child.

Eberle and Hall 3 years each.... Eberle is turning 23 next month and his 6M/year kicks

any of the Edmonton STARS might not hurt a team lead by a Pronger to the degree Bouwmeester did to the Flames but sure doesn't appear that any of them have the Royal jelly to carry a team into contention.


This year is really the tipping point where everyone has to realize that not only are the Oilers not as good as the sum of their parts....... Some of their parts are not near as good or valuable as they are being given credit for.

Would you trade Hall-Eberle and RHN for Stewart, Backes and Steen? Not on paper but St.L. will likely be in the playoffs for the next 2-3 years... where will the Oilers be?
You're joking right? You think that a bunch of kids on their first contracts are all losers that should be traded away?
comrade is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to comrade For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:13 AM   #25
Husky
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

I see the Oilers making 2 moves for huge shakeup.

1 - This only works if Jones is taken first and Edmonton/Carolina have the next 2 picks (or Drouin and Mackinnon) are still on the table together during picks. Something along the lines of Skinner and McBain for Oilers 1st. Carolina then drafts the combo duo.

2 - Oilers then flip Yakupov, MPS and something type package for Lucic and Krjeci; assuming Boston exits early and wants to "retool" like the Flyers did with Carter/Richards.

Oilers can then go hard at a guy like Horton.

They would just need a defensive D for their top 4 (and a goalie).

Lucic - Krejci - Horton
Hall - RNH - Eberle
Skinner - Gagne - Hemsky

This is all fantasy talk. Would never happen. But the Oilers do have quality assets they can move.
Husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:16 AM   #26
amazing_oilers
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kevin Lowe's cupboard
Exp:
Default

Not a chance Iginla signs with Edmonton. For one he has too much respect for Calgary fans and that'd be about as big of slap to them he could give. Secondly he's said he wants to win a cup and then another so why would he go to a team that is still rebuilding? Likely he takes a pay cut and stays with the Pens or goes to someother team that gets deep but doesn't quite make it. As for Edmonton the only way they should part with the lottery pick is if its someone established and still in or close to their prime. Not sure who'd be available that would make sense. Weber, Lucic (doubt the Bruins would move him) I don't know.
amazing_oilers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to amazing_oilers For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:17 AM   #27
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

I think that Boston deal is very heavily in Oilers favor can't imagine Boston wanting to do that.

MPS is not a very good player and shouldn't have much value at all as he looks like an okay 3rd line guy with no top 6 upside.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:19 AM   #28
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muffins View Post
What do you expect from a team whose scouting consists of picking the guy whose on the cover of the draft magazine.
The Oilers passed on Parise to draft the big center MAP.

I suspect passing on Yakupov to select Murray looks pretty similar 5 years down the road.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:20 AM   #29
speeds
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

IMO, it's unlikely EDM would get enough value back to move their 1st pick but as always it depends on the deal.

I think they could use improvement to their D, but if it were me I'd be looking for other ways to do so, ways that don't cost one of the top end forwards likely to be available when EDM picks.

Last edited by speeds; 04-25-2013 at 09:22 AM.
speeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:21 AM   #30
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
And then Edmonton's #1 centre is Sam Gagner.

That team made a huge mistake picking Yakupov when Galchenyuk was on the board.
I remember people saying they should have taken Murray but I always felt Galchenyuk was the right move.

Flip your 1st pick with Montreal's 3rd and gain another asset.

Montreal: Yakupov
Columbus: Murray
Oilers: Galchenyuk

Having two top tier centers (Galchenyuk, RNH) and two top tier wingers (Hall, Eberle) would have been the best move for the team. Plus they could have then moved Gagner for help on defense.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:27 AM   #31
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
I see the Oilers making 2 moves for huge shakeup.

1 - This only works if Jones is taken first and Edmonton/Carolina have the next 2 picks (or Drouin and Mackinnon) are still on the table together during picks. Something along the lines of Skinner and McBain for Oilers 1st. Carolina then drafts the combo duo.
Whey would the Hurricane's give up Skinner who is 20 years old and McBain who is 25, they will both be parts of any Hurricane rebuild. If the Oilers want Skinner they are giving up one of their big 6 players who's name does not rhyme with Blackablov.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
2 - Oilers then flip Yakupov, MPS and something type package for Lucic and Krjeci; assuming Boston exits early and wants to "retool" like the Flyers did with Carter/Richards.
My god, that's not going to happen. That something in your package would be a top 3 forward. Boston is not going to trade those two for what your stating. They consider Lucic to be a franchise level player, and Krjeci is far better then MPS.

Those are two deals that the Oilers would have to gut themselves to get.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
Oilers can then go hard at a guy like Horton.

They would just need a defensive D for their top 4 (and a goalie).

Lucic - Krejci - Horton
Hall - RNH - Eberle
Skinner - Gagne - Hemsky

This is all fantasy talk. Would never happen. But the Oilers do have quality assets they can move.
And a totally unaffordable lineup under a cap system in about a year or two.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:28 AM   #32
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

How much has Murray's injury hampered his development?

Erik Johnson missed an entire year & no one is saying he's elite.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:29 AM   #33
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

This is MacTavish we are talking about. His bold move will to trade Edmonton's first rounder for The Islander's fifth rounder.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:38 AM   #34
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

It is easy to look at the oiler picks and say how they could have gone different. Seguin versus Hall is evening out, but I would still rather have Tyler over Taylor, and would have gone that way on draft day. Too early on Nugent-Hopkins, as he has a lot of promise if he doesn't get injured too often, but Landeskog looks the better NHLer now. And Galchenyuk looks better than Yakupov too, but this is just on current play - it could be that if situations were reversed, the oiler kids would look better on Boston/Colorado/Montreal.
I think of all of their young guys, Eberle should be the untouchable one, as I feel he has a winning quality. Gagner would be the first to move, if there is a good market. I think that team needs to target players from winning organizations, such as Boston, Detroit, San Jose, players that have been in the playoffs and know what it takes.
San Jose may actually make a good trade partner, as they will need to re-energize their team with youth, to start to build around Couture as their main man.
Imported_Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Imported_Aussie For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:40 AM   #35
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I would deal Giordano AND Glencross for the Oilers pick assuming it's 6th overall or better. Not sure if either side is interested though. I can see Glencross waiving his NMC to go to Edmonton.
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:40 AM   #36
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

If Iggy ends up in Edmonton that would be the ultimate FU to Flames fans. I would never think of him the same way.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:44 AM   #37
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

The first + for Shattenkirk might be on the table depending on St. Louis budget situation. They need to give their RFA's big raises and they have Jbo's contract for one more year. If they can get Jbo to resign at a lower rate longer term (jbo is a good number 2 defensemen) then trading Shattenkirk and drafting Nurse might be good for them budget wise.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:50 AM   #38
Ruttiger
First Line Centre
 
Ruttiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
I would deal Giordano AND Glencross for the Oilers pick assuming it's 6th overall or better. Not sure if either side is interested though. I can see Glencross waiving his NMC to go to Edmonton.
A little early in the day to have consumed this much booze already, no?
Ruttiger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ruttiger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 09:59 AM   #39
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I could see the Oilers moving their first rounder to a team in the 13-17 range and acquiring an asset plus their pick then drafting Lazar. If they lose their next two games, it could be a third overall pick. What would the value of that be? I can't remember the last time a team traded a pick that high outright.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 10:05 AM   #40
Flame19,289
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Flame19,289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Exp:
Default

If Washington can't find a way to fit Alzner in under the cap, perhaps McPhee would package him along with the Caps 1st rounder to Edmonton in exchange for the Oilers pick.
Flame19,289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy