Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2013, 08:37 PM   #21
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

My vote for the design
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:37 PM   #22
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

nm

Last edited by afc wimbledon; 01-09-2013 at 09:43 PM.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:37 PM   #23
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Edit: CP is haunted.

Last edited by Jacks; 01-09-2013 at 08:46 PM.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:39 PM   #24
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
Didn't they try doing this in Germany, where they printed more money or something?
After the first world war, Germany printed a bunch of money to pay off it's punitive foreign debts which they were saddled with as reparation payments.

And yes, the inflation pretty much destroyed their economy.

As I have heard about this US plan, they really don't want to have to print this coin, they are just using it as a negotiating ploy cause they don't want the Republicans to hold the economy hostage again over the debt ceiling.

It wouldn't have the same catastrophic results as the Germany example anyway because the US GDP (or is it GNP?) is far higher than one trillion. But it certainly wouldn't help.

This is just the very basic understanding of it though, I'm sure someone who knows better will come in and refine and add to what I have written.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:40 PM   #25
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ View Post
Didn't they try doing this in Germany, where they printed more money or something?
After the first world war, Germany printed a bunch of money to pay off it's punitive foreign debts which they were saddled with as reparation payments.

And yes, the inflation pretty much destroyed their economy.

As I have heard about this US plan, they really don't want to have to print this coin, they are just using it as a negotiating ploy cause they don't want the Republicans to hold the economy hostage again over the debt ceiling.

It wouldn't have the same catastrophic results as the Germany example anyway because the US GDP (or is it GNP?) is far higher than one trillion. But it certainly wouldn't help.

This is just the very basic understanding of it though, I'm sure someone who knows better will come in and refine and add to what I have written.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:40 PM   #26
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This isn't a bad idea as a negotiating tactic by Obama to perhaps push through a compromise getting rid of this option and the debt ceiling once and for all so stupid people can't risk the country and world economy because they can.
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:40 PM   #27
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Whoopsy, double post.

Last edited by Daradon; 01-09-2013 at 08:46 PM.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:03 PM   #28
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

The difference between the trillion-dollar coin and the printing of money in Germany is two-fold:

One: the trillion dollars would not enter circulation. As such it would have no effect on the available money supply and would not lead to a de-valuation of the dollar. Also, the money represented by the coin would not be used to purchase foreign currency or gold, which was what the Mark was being used for at the time.

Secondly: The coin would not represent new spending, nor would it be an account from which the Administration would be able to withdraw at will. The Executive Branch cannot make decisions about spending in the United States, and it is required to honor the spending decisions of Congress. The 'coin-account' would only be able to be used to pay for things, such as interest-payments on debt, and existing programs, that have already been passed by Congress.

It's a stupid solution, and one that shouldn't be discussed by serious people, but when more than a third of Congress has demonstrated themselves to be utterly un-serious, stupid solutions need to be considered.
driveway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to driveway For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2013, 09:07 PM   #29
3 Justin 3
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
Exp:
Default

Posting in this thread only so I can have 12 double posts.
3 Justin 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:56 PM   #30
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

The really funny thing is that creating a trillion dollar coin isn't the stupidest part of this story.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 10:56 PM   #31
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

came in fully expecting a fake story from the cbc show 'this is that'
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 11:37 PM   #32
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Personally, I like the idea. It can circumvent the idiocy of Congress that is spending more than they tax while prohibiting borrowing the difference (at virtually no interest).

I hate the idea because it's:
a) an obvious ploy to circumvent the legal process
b) another expansion of supreme authority
c) still the best apparent solution.

Last edited by Gozer; 01-09-2013 at 11:48 PM.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 11:38 PM   #33
Teh_Bandwagoner
First Line Centre
 
Teh_Bandwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
Exp:
Default

I'm shocked and appalled that this hasn't been posted yet:



Edit:

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
"Give what back?"
Close enough!
__________________
Teh_Bandwagoner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Teh_Bandwagoner For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2013, 06:22 AM   #34
Swarly
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Swarly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

so... print 17 of these and poof, no more US debt? spread out over 10 years of course, all at once would just be a crazy plan

/crazy plan to begin with
Swarly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 07:17 AM   #35
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I guess it should be noted that no one is suggesting that this would eliminate the debt at all, and it wouldn't stave off bankruptcy. What it does is circumvent the debt ceiling.

Its still just silly, but that's what it would do.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 08:07 AM   #36
SeoulFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 서울특별시
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I guess it should be noted that no one is suggesting that this would eliminate the debt at all, and it wouldn't stave off bankruptcy. What it does is circumvent the debt ceiling.

Its still just silly, but that's what it would do.
You expected that people actually read the linked article? tsk tsk
SeoulFire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SeoulFire For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2013, 08:26 AM   #37
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

so would vending machnes, car washes and laundromats have to be retrofitted to handle the new coin?

Why go thru the point of minting a coin - just write the demonmination you want on a piece of papers and walk it on over to the treasury.
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 08:40 AM   #38
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone View Post
so would vending machnes, car washes and laundromats have to be retrofitted to handle the new coin?

Why go thru the point of minting a coin - just write the demonmination you want on a piece of papers and walk it on over to the treasury.
Because the latter wouldn't be legal tender?

They would be better off minting a thousand or so billion dollar coins. Or, more like ten thousand - then, anytime they needed to raise the debt ceiling they would have a stash in someone's desk they could raid to do so.

"Hey Bernie, ya gotta couple hundred billion around I can take? I need to cover next month's Social Security before the bank closes.""
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jammies For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2013, 09:00 AM   #39
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This thread is proof that people don't actually read the articles posted in original posts. Almost all the people in this thread are just giving knee-jerk reactions without actually understanding or even bothering to read the article.

This is not Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe printing money to inject into the economy and causing rampant inflation. This is not even about paying off debt.

There is a law in the U.S. that says that the government cannot spend past the debt ceiling. Every time the government needs to go more into deficit, they need to go to Congress to raise this limit.

Every time this happens, there is a huge political hubbub and Congress and the controlling parties demand concessions or policy changes, etc. before they will increase the debt ceiling.

Obama can avoid having to concede anything in terms of dealings with Congress and Republicans and bargaining in this manner if Geitner just mints a huge denomination platinum coin (legal loophole says that Platinum coins may be minted in any denomination at his discretion) and uses that instead of having to face the debt-ceiling law.

The debt will not change. Money will not go into the public. Nothing will happen aside from circumventing the debt-ceiling law.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hack&Lube For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2013, 09:09 AM   #40
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
There is a law in the U.S. that says that the government cannot spend past the debt ceiling. Every time the government needs to go more into deficit, they need to go to Congress to raise this limit.

Every time this happens, there is a huge political hubbub and Congress and the controlling parties demand concessions or policy changes, etc. before they will increase the debt ceiling.
No, there isn't a huge political hubbub every time. Raising the debt ceiling was formerly one of the most routine things Congress would pass regardless of which side was in power. That all changed in 2011 when a bunch of Tea Party morons decided to hold the US economy hostage because they hate Obama more than they love their country.

Something else that many people don't realize: raising the debt ceiling isn't the same as authorizing new spending; it's only allowing the federal government to pay the bills that have already been approved by Congress.
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy