Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2012, 01:27 PM   #21
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macker View Post
Saudi America is a term I lifted from Phillip Verleger......http://www.pkverlegerllc.com/ So yep......I meant what I said. With America having all this new oil it will impact things globally and locally......http://business.financialpost.com/20...ojects-report/ Add the Russian fields and horizontal completion and the term Peak Oil is laughable.
Ok, that's not exactly a standard usage, but fair enough. Currently the US is producing 6.2 mmboe/d, and importing 8.8 mmboe/d, according to the US EIA. http://205.254.135.7/oog/info/twip/twip_crude.html

Iran exports ~2.5 mmboe/d (http://www.indexmundi.com/iran/oil_exports.html) so for the US net exports to exceed Iran's they'd have to produce approximately 17.5 mmboe/d, or not quite triple their current production. I'm pretty sure that's not going to happen in the next 18 years, since that's pretty close to the total of what Russia and Saudi Arabia are currently producing.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 01:46 PM   #22
macker
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
Are you saying we've reached . . . peak gas?!

As far as gas goes I read a report earlier this year that for the first time ever the US is a net exporter of gas due to the superior refinery technologies. The US has nat gas reserves that are 3 times that of the Saudis oil reserves. 70% of US oil use is for transportation.....just switch fuels.

The Bakken changes the whole balance of oil by 2-3 million barrels per day and it is light sweet....Lots of both......The US just needs to switch fuels as 70% of oil use is for transporation. With the new technologies being used there is lots of both though....
macker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 01:55 PM   #23
macker
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Ok, that's not exactly a standard usage, but fair enough. Currently the US is producing 6.2 mmboe/d, and importing 8.8 mmboe/d, according to the US EIA. http://205.254.135.7/oog/info/twip/twip_crude.html

Iran exports ~2.5 mmboe/d (http://www.indexmundi.com/iran/oil_exports.html) so for the US net exports to exceed Iran's they'd have to produce approximately 17.5 mmboe/d, or not quite triple their current production. I'm pretty sure that's not going to happen in the next 18 years, since that's pretty close to the total of what Russia and Saudi Arabia are currently producing.




I would wager a billion bakken barrels on this.....
macker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 05:27 PM   #24
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

I would like a piece of that action.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2012, 08:20 PM   #25
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt View Post
I would like a piece of that action.
Yeah, I'd be up for a bet the US isn't producing 18 million barrels of oil a day in 2020. I'd prefer a futures type arrangement, because I'd like to cash in when it's obvious I've won in a couple of years, as opposed to waiting until 2020 to cash in.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 01:49 PM   #26
flamesfever
First Line Centre
 
flamesfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

For those interested, there is a good article in the Business section of the Calgary Herald, by Deborah Yedlin, which outlines the various factors, coming into play, with regard to the future oil price.

I really enjoy and appreciate her articles.
flamesfever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 02:34 PM   #27
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
lol true, but for my truck its $200 to fill it, and I go through that in 2-3 weeks.
That's pretty good. I spend about $150 on fuel a week here, and I have what is considered a "short commute".
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 03:09 PM   #28
flamesfever
First Line Centre
 
flamesfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
What I take away from it all is that MAYBE the smartest most influential people in the world can maybe kinda predict what the prices will do.....and if, in fact they can, they would never let us in on it. So its pointless to try and predict it.
I agree, but it's always nice to think you have some form of reasoning for making predictions, even though with human nature, and chance happenings, being what they are, we both know it's impossible to predict
with any degree of accuracy.

For a long time, we used to think oil would stay around $18.00 forever. However, with inflation and the printing of money, the relative value of everything, over the last decades, has increased by factor of 3 to 4 times. So, on that basis, oil at $80.00 is probably not too unreasonable, considering the speculation element has probably been removed recently with the risky world economic environment.

My gut tells me that, as time goes on, even the natural gas price will eventually get closer to the value of oil, on a BTU basis. However , it will probably take a long time before the various newer technologies work their way through the system, the transportation networks are established, etc. and the markets stabilize.
flamesfever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 04:19 PM   #29
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
What I take away from it all is that MAYBE the smartest most influential people in the world can maybe kinda predict what the prices will do.....and if, in fact they can, they would never let us in on it. So its pointless to try and predict it.
That's not true. Stacey is one of such people and already shared with us that mortgages will be over 3.9% in 5 years.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 10:28 PM   #30
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macker View Post
Not sure what you are trying to guess that I am getting at but about gas prices......they have peaked for the year imo. Doesn't hurt that the passive investor has been knocked out of the market so that you don't have trading banks like JP Morgan doing what they were doing in 2009 playing with Contango and sitting on 30-40 million barrels of oil. Takes two to Contango....
What do you mean by playing with contango?
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 10:51 PM   #31
macker
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
What do you mean by playing with contango?
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/...#axzz1yJ1eAL5M

Opposite of backwardation and both sound like ballroom dances
macker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 11:27 PM   #32
stacey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
That's not true. Stacey is one of such people and already shared with us that mortgages will be over 3.9% in 5 years.
Well lets wait and see if you can predict the future Nostradamus...

I'd love to know what "night manager in charge of cat toys" job you actually are employed at that lends itself to your economic expertise...
stacey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 12:09 AM   #33
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stacey View Post
Well lets wait and see if you can predict the future Nostradamus...

I'd love to know what "night manager in charge of cat toys" job you actually are employed at that lends itself to your economic expertise...
You're still pissed you can't understand how the bond market works, huh?
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 09:03 AM   #34
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
You're still pissed you can't understand how the bond market works, huh?
Did I miss a discussion on CP of bond prices moving inversely to rates or how longer duration, lower coupon bonds are more interest rate sensitive somewhere on CP or something? When has the bond market ever come up...?!?!
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 12:49 PM   #35
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

This thread is no longer about tight oil in Russia.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2012, 11:19 PM   #36
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macker View Post
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/...#axzz1yJ1eAL5M

Opposite of backwardation and both sound like ballroom dances
What I mean specifically was what do you mean by playing? You mean simply storing crude? If so I don't see what the big deal is.
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy