Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-20-2011, 09:59 AM   #21
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashartus View Post
No one would be drawing Mohammed if Muslims just believed it was offensive to draw him and therefore didn't draw him themselves.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:01 AM   #22
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Tomorrow should be call a black person "n*****" day!
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:09 AM   #23
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Tomorrow should be call a black person "n*****" day!
Not really sure it's the same thing. Our society puts a lot of emphasis on freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Both concepts necessitate the freedom to be able to do things like critique religions without fearing violence. So in order for our society to function, certain aspects of religion have to be kept private. You basically need to practice your own religion without telling other people how to practice their's.

Our society puts little value on hatred towards people's ethnicity/race. Although it is perfectly legal to go up to a black person and refer to them as a n******, you're unlikely to get much support from others in doing so. Furthermore, it's very hard to do that without suggesting violence. Noone here is walking up to random muslim people on the street and shouting derogatory names at them. That too would likely to get you much support. You've essentially got a difference between harrassing an individual and critiquing an idea.

In a lot of situations it is a fine line, but hating on a religion definitely is not the same thing as hating an ethnicity/race.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:21 AM   #24
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Legal case is still wending its way through the Pakistani legal system, but it's looking like Facebook may be banned permanently. LINK
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:25 AM   #25
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Not really sure it's the same thing. Our society puts a lot of emphasis on freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Both concepts necessitate the freedom to be able to do things like critique religions without fearing violence. So in order for our society to function, certain aspects of religion have to be kept private. You basically need to practice your own religion without telling other people how to practice their's.

Our society puts little value on hatred towards people's ethnicity/race. Although it is perfectly legal to go up to a black person and refer to them as a n******, you're unlikely to get much support from others in doing so. Furthermore, it's very hard to do that without suggesting violence. Noone here is walking up to random muslim people on the street and shouting derogatory names at them. That too would likely to get you much support. You've essentially got a difference between harrassing an individual and critiquing an idea.

In a lot of situations it is a fine line, but hating on a religion definitely is not the same thing as hating an ethnicity/race.
You are still knowingly and intentionally offending a group of people. That's not all that different from racism. Whether its done in print, online, or in person doesn't really change it. This whole thing is basically saying "yeah we are dissing you, what are you gonna do about it?".

I am still convinced that people that want to participate in this are closet bigots more than defenders of free speech. Blanketly insulting an entire faith of people is not satire, justice, or anything like that. Its basically giving a big middle finger to people different from you, just because you want to.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:40 AM   #26
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
You are still knowingly and intentionally offending a group of people. That's not all that different from racism. Whether its done in print, online, or in person doesn't really change it. This whole thing is basically saying "yeah we are dissing you, what are you gonna do about it?".
Their sensibilities do not trump the rights of others to free expression. They are not forced to view offensive material.

Quote:
I am still convinced that people that want to participate in this are closet bigots more than defenders of free speech.
No doubt there are those who would take advantage of the opportunity to spew hate.

Quote:
Blanketly insulting an entire faith of people is not satire, justice, or anything like that. Its basically giving a big middle finger to people different from you, just because you want to.
Killing people for disagreeing with your faith is the greatest possible evil.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:40 AM   #27
malcolmk14
Franchise Player
 
malcolmk14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

I work on a floor with about 50 people, about half of which are Muslim. If I were to draw out a picture of Mohammed and tape it to my office door, that's not free speech. That's offensive and obnoxious and I would probably be fired for it, and rightfully so.
malcolmk14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:46 AM   #28
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post
I work on a floor with about 50 people, about half of which are Muslim. If I were to draw out a picture of Mohammed and tape it to my office door, that's not free speech. That's offensive and obnoxious and I would probably be fired for it, and rightfully so.
Companies have policies regarding how offices are decorated. I imagine photos of the Pope or Stephen Harper wouldn't be allowed either. And rightly so.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 05-20-2011, 10:51 AM   #29
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

So, to the anti-draw Mohammed day people:

You guys realize the devout Muslims are under no obligation to look at these drawings right?

I burn bibles all the time in my fireplace. They're easy to come by and make great kindling. No one has ever complained.

If I stood outside a Catholic Church and did it I could see why people would be pissed.

If people are marching through the streets with pics of Mohammed it is offensive but people can choose not to look. If I stand outside a Mosque that is pretty ######y.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:57 AM   #30
malcolmk14
Franchise Player
 
malcolmk14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Companies have policies regarding how offices are decorated. I imagine photos of the Pope or Stephen Harper wouldn't be allowed either. And rightly so.
That's a fair point, actually. I'm actually curious to get your opinion on something else. During Ramadan, half of our floor fasts from sunrise to sunset. So during the day at work, they're starving.

Obviously it's their own religion that says they shouldn't eat during daylight hours, but as a token of acknowledgement for the people we work with, we get rid of all the fruit and granola bars on our floor for that month, and for the most part close our office doors or eat downstairs in the lobby during meal times. Would you say that we're being oversensitive?
malcolmk14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 10:58 AM   #31
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post
That's a fair point, actually. I'm actually curious to get your opinion on something else. During Ramadan, half of our floor fasts from sunrise to sunset. So during the day at work, they're starving.

Obviously it's their own religion that says they shouldn't eat during daylight hours, but as a token of acknowledgement for the people we work with, we get rid of all the fruit and granola bars on our floor for that month, and for the most part close our office doors or eat downstairs in the lobby during meal times. Would you say that we're being oversensitive?
Do you have a lunch room?

If yes, then yes that is oversensitive. It might be rude to talk about the juicy steak you're eating for lunch though.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 11:00 AM   #32
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
You are still knowingly and intentionally offending a group of people. That's not all that different from racism. Whether its done in print, online, or in person doesn't really change it. This whole thing is basically saying "yeah we are dissing you, what are you gonna do about it?".
It is different than racism. People have no right to have their religious ideals upheld by others. People have no right not to be offended. If you can't draw Mohammed, where do you draw the line. Are you going to stop eating cow, because Hindus find it offensive? Or pork because Jews find it offensive?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
I am still convinced that people that want to participate in this are closet bigots more than defenders of free speech. Blanketly insulting an entire faith of people is not satire, justice, or anything like that. Its basically giving a big middle finger to people different from you, just because you want to.
This I agree with you on. Many of the people who participate are more than just closet biggots; they are full on bigots. All though I do support the idea of EDMD and the rights of people to actually draw Mohammed, I don't participate for this reason. It has essentially become a lightning rod for Islamophobia.

So...basically what I am saying is that theoretically EDMD could be used to protect the ideals of freedom of speech, but many people are clearly not using it for that. I, however, take no issue with those that are participating in EDMD for the purpose of freedom of expression/religion. Threats (and in some cases full on acts of violence and murder) have been made and they have every right to stand up to those threats.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 11:01 AM   #33
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post
That's a fair point, actually. I'm actually curious to get your opinion on something else. During Ramadan, half of our floor fasts from sunrise to sunset. So during the day at work, they're starving.

Obviously it's their own religion that says they shouldn't eat during daylight hours, but as a token of acknowledgement for the people we work with, we get rid of all the fruit and granola bars on our floor for that month, and for the most part close our office doors or eat downstairs in the lobby during meal times. Would you say that we're being oversensitive?
I'd say you guys are lucky in that you get a meal break to begin with.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 05-20-2011, 11:02 AM   #34
malcolmk14
Franchise Player
 
malcolmk14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
Do you have a lunch room?

If yes, then yes that is oversensitive. It might be rude to talk about the juicy steak you're eating for lunch though.
No lunch room.
malcolmk14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 11:18 AM   #35
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
It is different than racism. People have no right to have their religious ideals upheld by others. People have no right not to be offended. If you can't draw Mohammed, where do you draw the line. Are you going to stop eating cow, because Hindus find it offensive? Or pork because Jews find it offensive?
I never said you shouldn't be allowed to draw Mohammed. I just think its silly do to so with the explicit purpose of irritating a group of people.

I eat beef and pork but don't go around rallying support for it in order to display my support for freedom of beef/pork consumption. I don't feel the need to get in someone's face about it like this draw Mohammed Day is attempting to get in the face of Muslim people.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Igottago For This Useful Post:
Old 05-20-2011, 11:23 AM   #36
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
I never said you shouldn't be allowed to draw Mohammed. I just think its silly do to so with the explicit purpose of irritating a group of people.

I eat beef and pork but don't go around rallying support for it in order to display my support for freedom of beef/pork consumption. I don't feel the need to get in someone's face about it like this draw Mohammed Day is attempting to get in the face of Muslim people.
Just like I really hate that "get-in-your-face" act of beheading someone over an opinion.

That's what needs to be challenged.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 12:14 PM   #37
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
I never said you shouldn't be allowed to draw Mohammed. I just think its silly do to so with the explicit purpose of irritating a group of people.

I eat beef and pork but don't go around rallying support for it in order to display my support for freedom of beef/pork consumption. I don't feel the need to get in someone's face about it like this draw Mohammed Day is attempting to get in the face of Muslim people.
If someone had threatened your life and murdered people because they had eaten pork, the situation might be different.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 12:23 PM   #38
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Just like I really hate that "get-in-your-face" act of beheading someone over an opinion.

That's what needs to be challenged.
Do you refuse to separate radical Islam from the normal Islam?

I wonder why Muslims get frustrated when people are so willing to throw them all in the same basket.

There is a massive difference between people that venerate and agree with people like Sayyid Quibt (sp) and people that just want people to respect their belief system.

I'm sure that the radical groups just love this day because it just drives angry and disenfranchised into their waiting arms.

Basically things like Draw Mohammed day are just playing into the hands of the radical nutjobs.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 12:30 PM   #39
Ben_in_Canada
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ben_in_Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where ever I'm told to be
Exp:
Default

Interesting article from the 'Europe News' from 2007
http://europenews.dk/en/node/6517
Ben_in_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2011, 12:43 PM   #40
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Do you refuse to separate radical Islam from the normal Islam?
Sure.

People are still dying though.

Quote:
I wonder why Muslims get frustrated when people are so willing to throw them all in the same basket.

There is a massive difference between people that venerate and agree with people like Sayyid Quibt (sp) and people that just want people to respect their belief system.
I'm under no obligation to respect their belief system. I do respect their right to practice their faith as long as it does not infringe on my freedoms.

Quote:
I'm sure that the radical groups just love this day because it just drives angry and disenfranchised into their waiting arms.

Basically things like Draw Mohammed day are just playing into the hands of the radical nutjobs.
They are powerless to stop it.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy