Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2024, 06:03 PM   #3781
Kipper_3434
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Sharongovich numbers are pretty comparable to Mangiapane's when he signed his current deal. Given that Mangiapane was an RFA they could have traded him that season for a pretty good return. Hindsight being what it is, they probably should have. I like Sharangovich, but if his ask is big, move him at the TDL when expiring players are most valuable. No way teams are throwing away top 15 picks at the draft without an extention in place.
Kipper_3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 09:28 PM   #3782
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
That’s not how it works.
Unless he can consistently repeat his 30 goal season, I’d take my chance with the 15th overall any time

Pick always have good value for its potential
Statistically most first round picks never pan out to their expectations. There is no reason Sharangovich can't repeatedly hit 30 with that shot.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 10:13 PM   #3783
Dan403
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFan View Post
I think Conroy saw Sharangovich's best season this year.
I don’t think he did.

So…we’re even.
Dan403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2024, 10:16 PM   #3784
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFan View Post
I think Conroy saw Sharangovich's best season this year.
We all saw Sharangoviches best season...to date
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2024, 11:01 PM   #3785
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Shanragivich was shooting over 17% last year. That's 5% higher then his career average.
He's almost certainly going to regress. Won't be supprised at all if he's 20-25 goals and 40-50 points.

If someone offered you a top 15 pick for this type of pending UFA it would be ridiculous not to take it.
It's a moot point though because no team would be stupid enough to do that.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2024, 12:22 AM   #3786
Rhett44
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

I like Sharangovich but if we over pay for him, we will regret it. He has a great shot, but on a good team he is probably a borderline 2nd liner.

I don't know, he is a fine player but not a player I would build around and give a big contract to.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 04:54 AM   #3787
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Statistically most first round picks never pan out to their expectations. There is no reason Sharangovich can't repeatedly hit 30 with that shot.
It really depends on what contract he is willing to sign for. That fact has to function in the decision to sign or trade him.

But I seriously doubt anyone would trade a top 15 pick in the 2024 draft for him. He would need a contract extension, and if Calgary finds his demands unreasonable, I expect other teams will as well.

I expect he’ll go to the wire at the deadline or close to it before we know if he signs or go. One thing Conroy has been consistent with is he signs you or trades you.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 05:40 AM   #3788
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
I like Sharangovich but if we over pay for him, we will regret it. He has a great shot, but on a good team he is probably a borderline 2nd liner.

I don't know, he is a fine player but not a player I would build around and give a big contract to.
Regret it how? We don’t exactly need cap space. And when do you not regret “over paying” someone?

I guess I don’t see a situation where he gets more than 4 years so I can’t see a scenario where we “regret it”
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2024, 08:04 AM   #3789
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I guess this could go here, but I heard Seravalli on the 960 morning show today (first time I had listened to that in forever, it hasn't improved but I digress) and they brought up the possibility of Calgary acquiring Necas but using their 9OA to do so. I guess this was on the heels of a LeBrun article on The Athletic which suggested the Flames were making calls to Carolina.

I no longer subscribe to that site, does anyone have the details?
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:09 AM   #3790
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I really hope that isn’t the direction they are taking with their 9th pick.
agulati is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:12 AM   #3791
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

After trading the 9th overall pick for Necas, the Flames will continue to have no young stars on the roster.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:12 AM   #3792
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

To be clear Frank wasn't suggesting this would happen, just that the morning show crew ran it past him. I wasn't sure if LeBrun had maybe suggested the #9 was in play.

Frank did say that it comes down to what the Flames see themselves as. Which goes back to the retooling/rebuilding/contending argument.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:15 AM   #3793
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Sharangovich, Kuzmenko and Mangiapane:


I see them as players you either re-sign for fair deals on shorter-term contracts, or you trade.


All of them - including Mangiapane who I would argue is underrated now - are strong contributors in their own ways. None are core players. The most critical work that needs to be completed in the next 2-3 years is finding core players through the draft. The more bullets you have, the better chance you have of finding them.


This is not to say that you should sell everything and turn this into a scorched-earth build. I don't think that's a very great way to do things either. I don't see a great path in trying to turn around and compete in the next year or two, and I don't see a great path in taking it down to the studs, bulldozing it, and completely replacing the foundation either.


Just don't make moves to win now. This team is a bottom 5 team. Don't give long-term deals to anyone that isn't a core piece from now until at least you have those core pieces, unless they are very young (Zary/Coronato young) and are at least very strong support pieces. Sharangovich is on that line for me personally. If you can trade him for what amounts to be a great return (whatever that's identified as), then great - trade him. If you can re-sign him for a fair deal that keeps him around for the next 4 years or so, that's good too. If he wants a long-term deal that pays him an uncomfortable amount, you trade him to the highest bidder.


That's what I want the Flames to do. No 'win now' movies because there are really zero core pieces in place right now, and there is no real opportunity to win. Keep rebuilding. This is a rebuild. It is not a scorched-earth rebuild, but it is much bigger than a retool. Retooling is moving a couple of core pieces in and out - I would argue that Gaudreau leaving and the Tkachuk trade/Kadri re-signing was a massive retool. You see it in a season.



This is going to be a multi-season build. Keep building until you think you have enough core pieces and the team is rising in the standings. Not a fluke playoff run when everything came together because of a coach that road his horses to death. Just keep building and keep being patient. The entertainment level and appeal of the Flames will grow as the talent level builds. You can't put lipstick on a pig and expect repeat customers to come and kiss the beauty pageant winner.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2024, 08:15 AM   #3794
Buzzard
First Line Centre
 
Buzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
To be clear Frank wasn't suggesting this would happen, just that the morning show crew ran it past him. I wasn't sure if LeBrun had maybe suggested the #9 was in play.

Frank did say that it comes down to what the Flames see themselves as. Which goes back to the retooling/rebuilding/contending argument.
Considering that source, I'd suggest there is a -95% chance of this happening.
Buzzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:18 AM   #3795
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I can't emphasize enough how poor of asset management moving the 9OA for a soon-to-be expensive RFA would be. In a cap world, it just doesn't make sense, let alone for where the Flames are in their competitive window.

So no, I can't imagine Conroy making that move, and I won't even concern myself with that being a direction they're even considering. Maybe it is Necas, but certainly cannot be talking about 9OA.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2024, 08:21 AM   #3796
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
I can't emphasize enough how poor of asset management moving the 9OA for a soon-to-be expensive RFA would be. In a cap world, it just doesn't make sense, let alone for where the Flames are in their competitive window.

So no, I can't imagine Conroy making that move, and I won't even concern myself with that being a direction they're even considering. Maybe it is Necas, but certainly cannot be talking about 9OA.
This is ultimately why the Flames trying to re-tool and trading assets for "younger" players will just not work.

The only players they are going to get, at best, are players like Necas who have fallen out of favour with their current team (and they must also be questioning his potential), will no longer be on a cheap contract, and really aren't all that young anymore.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 05-31-2024, 08:46 AM   #3797
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
This is ultimately why the Flames trying to re-tool and trading assets for "younger" players will just not work.

The only players they are going to get, at best, are players like Necas who have fallen out of favour with their current team (and they must also be questioning his potential), will no longer be on a cheap contract, and really aren't all that young anymore.
It won’t work because of a move they haven’t made and will likely not make?
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:50 AM   #3798
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

nvm

Last edited by Ashasx; 05-31-2024 at 08:56 AM.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:51 AM   #3799
CFO
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
This is ultimately why the Flames trying to re-tool and trading assets for "younger" players will just not work.

The only players they are going to get, at best, are players like Necas who have fallen out of favour with their current team (and they must also be questioning his potential), will no longer be on a cheap contract, and really aren't all that young anymore.
So just like Sam bennett
CFO is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2024, 08:57 AM   #3800
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Yeah teams just don't trade elite young players for B prospects, late draft picks and pending UFAs..

Well except the flames...
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy