Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-03-2025, 12:57 PM   #361
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTech780 View Post
Solovyov isn't better than Bean, maybe Miromanov, but if they decide to send Parekh back to junior then Miromanov becomes the 7th defenseman on the team.
BS. My dog is better than Bean.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 12:57 PM   #362
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Don’t the Flames get first crack?
they do but I'm not sure if he can then be sent to the AHL...which is what they wanted in the first place. Or would they need to waive him again?

Most teams passed though
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 10-03-2025 at 01:24 PM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 12:58 PM   #363
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I think its likely the Avs waive him again...would the Flames be able to claim and send him to the AHL? or would he still need waivers?
if they are the only one putting in a claim, they can send him to the AHL.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2025, 01:00 PM   #364
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
BS. My dog is better than Bean.
Probably think the same about Huska
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:00 PM   #365
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
if they are the only one putting in a claim, they can send him to the AHL.
Would the Flames know if anyone else made a claim, prior to putting him on waivers again? You'd think these days they would know.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:00 PM   #366
PaperBagger'14
Franchise Player
 
PaperBagger'14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I think its likely the Avs waive him again...would the Flames be able to claim and send him to the AHL? or would he still need waivers?
If the avs waive him and only the flames put a claim in he can be sent to the AHL, I’m assuming if another team claims him it then goes by waiver wire priority
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhog View Post
Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid
PaperBagger'14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:02 PM   #367
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Mirimanov sucks, not good at offense, for an offensive dman, and not a good defender itself.

Don’t see him as an option in the short, medium or long term. Why he was kept over a dman the team invested in thru the draft and thru development , seems quite unfortunate.

Not a big deal in the long run, as Solovyov isn’t a sure fire nhl calibre dman today, and even if he is, probably tops out as a 5-7 guy. Still, an unnecessary and unfortunate loss ….
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:04 PM   #368
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

The Group 6 UFA stuff is really the part that makes this ok. It is unlikely he would play 65 NHL games this season and would be gone anyway.

Maybe he becomes Gustav Forsling.. but more likely in the KHL next year.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:05 PM   #369
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

The positive takeaway here is that Kerins cleared and now knows that he has to go down to the AHL and continue to work his ass off as no other team in the NHL was interested in him... yet.

That should be motivating for a guy like him. Guys who pass through waivers don't have the luxury of sulking about it.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:07 PM   #370
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Probably think the same about Huska
I think Huska would be a good coach for a large physical club. I think Bean just sucks period.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:11 PM   #371
This post is terrible
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

This wouldn’t have happened if we still had Treliving!
This post is terrible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:14 PM   #372
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Losing Solo is pretty frustrating. Should've been Miromanov.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:22 PM   #373
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Flames clearly think Soloyov is worse than those two guys, it’s really that simple.
I think it could be easily argued that Solo had a better camp than both of them. As such, this looks more like a business decision. They kept the vets with more NHL games and hoped the younger guy would clear. But Avs scouts pounced.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:24 PM   #374
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I'm not happy about losing Solo either, but terrible asset management? really?!
  • Former waiver pickups Hanley and Pachal were just as good as Solo in camp,
  • Making Solo the 7th/8th best D-men at best.
  • Solo was a 7th round pick.
  • Solo is already 25, and one year younger than Pachal.
  • What is the best return Solo could've gotten you back in a trade? A 6th rounder?

More over this frees up a spot on the Wranglers giving younger guys like Morin, Brzustewicz, and Kuznetsov more playing time in the AHL, and likely the first call-up.

Prospect with no NHL experience was as good as 2 vets (waiver-wire vets mind you)…perhaps there’s a chance he’d be better if he got actual experience? In most professions you need to be good enough to get in but then learn a hell of a lot on the job. Oh well.
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:24 PM   #375
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Flames

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Disappointed to lose Solovyov but he's also much closer to being what he is at 25, only a year younger than Pachal.

Brzustewicz is 20, Grushnikov is 22, Kuznetsov is 23.

Still would have preferred waiving Miromanov first and tried sneaking Solo down on the last day.
I prefer Solo to Miromanov or Bean easily, like not even close to be honest but Solovyov is 25 years old and while he looked ready the readiness was a bottom pairing or 7th dman role. We picked Pachel off waivers when he was 24, was that amazing asset management? No absolutely not. The Flames have an a absolute glut of fringe blue liners. I won't lose much sleep over this or cry about it like when Schwindt won some face offs last year.
__________________
MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:28 PM   #376
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Flames still have more waiving to do so Miro is likley waived too so that argument is kinda silly

If Solo had trade value nearly the entire league wouldnt have passed on him for free...all the bad teams
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:31 PM   #377
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigThief View Post
I prefer Solo to Miromanov or Bean easily, like not even close to be honest but Solovyov is 25 years old and while he looked ready the readiness was a bottom pairing or 7th dman role. We picked Pachel off waivers when he was 24, was that amazing asset management? No absolutely not. The Flames have an a absolute glut of fringe blue liners. I won't lose much sleep over this or cry about it like when Schwindt won some face offs last year.
I thought Solovyov looked good with Pachal. Very frustrating that we lost him so that we could... see more of Bean and Miromanov instead.

Oh well. Hopefully this opens the door for a Kuznetsov transition to the NHL this year.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:34 PM   #378
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

31 other teams couldn't Kerins less
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2025, 01:35 PM   #379
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
I think it could be easily argued that Solo had a better camp than both of them. As such, this looks more like a business decision. They kept the vets with more NHL games and hoped the younger guy would clear. But Avs scouts pounced.
Argued is the key word. We will see and maybe this one will be the one that bites the Flames in the ass but I highly doubt it. If prospects turn out then Bean, Miramanov, and Soloyov wouldn't have been on the team next season anyways.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2025, 01:41 PM   #380
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

If the Avs put Solo on waivers, the Flames do not get priority to get him back. Waiver wire priority is last year's standings reversed. If another team higher on the list than the Flames, then the other team gets him. If another team lower on the list than the Flames makes a claim, then the Flames get him but would have to waive him again in order to send him to the AHL. If the Flames claim him and no other team put in a claim, they can send him straight to the AHL without putting on waivers again.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy