Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
I mean, saying "wow, I didn't realize that Blade Runner was based on a Philip K. Dick story" is one thing. But Dune might be the single most well-known piece of sci fi writing in the history of books. The only real competition would be 1984 or Frankenstein (if that even counts)... can't really think of anything else that would be in the same conversation in terms of popularity.
It's just a weird thing to have missed.
|
People like different things in their lives. When the Fellowship of the Ring had first come out in theatres, I took my (first) wife to go see it. She quite enjoyed it, but noted that she didn't like how it ended, with Gandalf dying and it being "some kind of weird non-ending" that "left too many questions unanswered".
I just goggled at her for a minute, then I realized...she'd never read any of the 'Hobbit' books, so she didn't realize that FotR was the first of three. It happens. There are a lot of people out there with different tastes.
Me, personally...I've never read Dune. I tried once but found it excruciatingly boring (and I've read the unabridged Les Miserables novel), have looked over some plot summaries since and decided it's not interesting enough to me and my tastes to try again.
Same with Blade Runner, btw. I tried reading that and couldn't. I've watched about half of the movie, but got too bored to finish it.
But being surprised that someone isn't familiar with a book written in 1965, especially since it's not really been in any sort of pop culture spotlight since a pretty crappy movie attempt in 1984 seems rather...snobby.