06-20-2025, 11:20 AM
|
#341
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
I personally believe that Pospisil has far more value than most believe. He has a skillset that the entire league covets, and his contract makes him even more valuable.
I just don't think Conroy has even the slightest appetite to move him.
|
I think if the right player is on the table, he would be asset teams would want if they couldn't get Zary.
Zary/Flames expected to be done "Sooner rather then later". 3-4 year bridge is what I'm hearing.
__________________

|
|
|
The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
|
442scotty,
aaronkarlpatton,
activeStick,
archer,
bdubbs,
calculoso,
Cole436,
ColossusXIII,
ComixZone,
CrazyCaper,
D as in David,
Demetric,
Dion,
FacePaint,
flambers,
flamesgod,
Flames_F.T.W,
getbak,
Hockey_Ninja,
IamNotKenKing,
iloveicedhockey,
jaikorven,
joejoe3,
JT45,
Madman,
Mustache,
Redliner,
rogermexico,
Seitse,
serratedmuffin,
shutout,
Stillman16,
Tacoman,
Tbull8,
Toonage,
UKflames,
Vinny01,
Yeah_Baby
|
06-20-2025, 11:22 AM
|
#342
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
I personally believe that Pospisil has far more value than most believe. He has a skillset that the entire league covets, and his contract makes him even more valuable.
I just don't think Conroy has even the slightest appetite to move him.
|
Yeah, I've always been a fan of Pospisil too. I think the Flames were taking their time with him to learn how to walk the line better than he was doing at the start of his career, because if he can find that line and perfect playing right up against it without going over, he's going to be a hell of a piece for the Flames.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:23 AM
|
#343
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
I don't get the desire to sign Kirkland. Pat on 960 seems to be all hot and bothered over getting this guy signed right away.
What am I missing?
|
He was pretty good in the shootout, and managed to put up some points on the 4th line. He probably got the Flames at least 2 points in the standings in a very limited amount of games. That's pretty good for a guy that will be making league min, and can be your 13th forward.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:23 AM
|
#344
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Look at the Flames on wing right now
Huberdeau, Coronato, Sharangovich, Farabee, Coleman. 5 wingers, 4 left shots, making 10.5, 6.5, 5.75, 5, 4.9M.
Klapka, Pospisil signed so that leaves 1 more spot and likely that is Zary who the team is likely going to use on the wing.
If the Flames are adding wingers there will be some on the way out.
|
Forgetting about Lomberg too. If we didn't have Lomberg then Jeannot makes sense, but Lomberg and Jeannot on the same team seems silly.
NHL Wingers - 9 : Huberdeau, Coronato, Sharangovich, Farabee, Coleman, Zary, Lomberg, Klapka, Pospisil,
AHL Prospects Close to NHL Action - 3 : Stromgren, Honzek, Kerins,
Junior Prospects that Could Push - 4: Gridin, Battaglia, Suniev, Basha,
So yeah IMO at least one winger should have been moved anyways, and if you're adding a Jeannot or Peterka then it's probably 2 wingers that need to go out.
In terms of Peterka I kind of get it...he's an upgrade on the wingers you do have...Jeannot feels weird on team with Lomberg, Klapka, and Pospisil already.
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-20-2025 at 11:27 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:23 AM
|
#345
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214
Flames are not shopping Coleman but teams have been calling and asking. He's a professional multi tool, flames highly covet him. It would take a pure win for CC to move him.
|
I am glad the flames are taking the calls but this is everything that is wrong with the flames mgmt in a nutshell right here for me. You need to hit a home run to move a 34 year old winger who is blocking a young players dev spot and 100% wont be here if/when the team is ready to compete for a cup... thats an easy sell on a well run team. I get that you don't want to burn it down and keep the environment competitive for the young kids who do come in, but backlund, kadri, weegar, huberdeau etc are all going nowhere there is a solid veteran core already
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
|
Ashasx,
Bonecrushing Hits,
CliffFletcher,
Dion,
Flamezzz,
Housley4Prez,
Mightyfire89,
saillias,
serratedmuffin,
SuperMatt18,
traptor,
Two Fivenagame
|
06-20-2025, 11:24 AM
|
#346
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214
I think if the right player is on the table, he would be asset teams would want if they couldn't get Zary.
Zary/Flames expected to be done "Sooner rather then later". 3-4 year bridge is what I'm hearing.
|
A 4 year deal has him with 1 more year as a RFA I believe? Makes sense to max out the remaining RFA years if going bridge but definitely not walking him right to UFA
|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:26 AM
|
#347
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
Yeah, I've always been a fan of Pospisil too. I think the Flames were taking their time with him to learn how to walk the line better than he was doing at the start of his career, because if he can find that line and perfect playing right up against it without going over, he's going to be a hell of a piece for the Flames.
|
He's got wheels, which is a weak spot on this team. The concern for me is concussion history and how it will affect his game.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:26 AM
|
#348
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
I am glad the flames are taking the calls but this is everything that is wrong with the flames mgmt in a nutshell right here for me. You need to hit a home run to move a 34 year old winger who is blocking a young players dev spot and 100% wont be here if/when the team is ready to compete for a cup... thats an easy sell on a well run team. I get that you don't want to burn it down and keep the environment competitive for the young kids who do come in, but backlund, kadri, weegar, huberdeau etc are all going nowhere there is a solid veteran core already
|
Coleman to me brings the most value at this years trade deadline at 50% retention. Teams overpay for guys like that at the deadline and 2 playoff runs with a $2.45M cap hit is going to get a 1st+ in return
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:26 AM
|
#349
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
A 4 year deal has him with 1 more year as a RFA I believe? Makes sense to max out the remaining RFA years if going bridge but definitely not walking him right to UFA
|
Pretty dangerous imo. Player goes to arbitration gets a 1 year deal and walks easily or forces the team to deal them from a place of weakness if they won't re up
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:27 AM
|
#350
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Forgetting about Lomberg too. If we didn't have Lomberg then Jeannot makes sense, but Lomberg and Jeannot on the same team seems silly.
NHL Wingers - 9 : Huberdeau, Coronato, Sharangovich, Farabee, Coleman, Zary, Lomberg, Klapka, Pospisil,
AHL Prospects Close to NHL Action - 3 : Stromgren, Honzek, Kerins,
Junior Prospects that Could Push - 4: Gridin, Battaglia, Suniev, Basha,
So yeah IMO at least one winger should have been moved anyways, and if you're adding a Jeannot or Peterka then it's probably 2 wingers that need to go out.
|
Can’t believe I forgot Lombo!!!
|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:27 AM
|
#351
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
Pretty dangerous imo. Player goes to arbitration gets a 1 year deal and walks easily or forces the team to deal them from a place of weakness if they won't re up
|
3 year deal would be preferred
|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:34 AM
|
#352
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
3 year deal would be preferred
|
Agents job is to drive leverage for his client… by going 4 years and the player believes he can be every day top 6C means he will have all the power in the next negotiation.
__________________

|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:36 AM
|
#353
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
I am glad the flames are taking the calls but this is everything that is wrong with the flames mgmt in a nutshell right here for me. You need to hit a home run to move a 34 year old winger who is blocking a young players dev spot and 100% wont be here if/when the team is ready to compete for a cup... thats an easy sell on a well run team. I get that you don't want to burn it down and keep the environment competitive for the young kids who do come in, but backlund, kadri, weegar, huberdeau etc are all going nowhere there is a solid veteran core already
|
Pure win doesn’t mean home run offer….
__________________

|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:40 AM
|
#355
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
I really hope the use the following 4 centers this year
Kadri
Zary
Frost
Backlund
Play the lines that are 'feeling it' on a nightly basis and
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Demetric For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:43 AM
|
#356
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
Pretty dangerous imo. Player goes to arbitration gets a 1 year deal and walks easily or forces the team to deal them from a place of weakness if they won't re up
|
Similar to what made the Tkachuk contract situation so dire for the Flames.
|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:50 AM
|
#357
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
A 4 year deal has him with 1 more year as a RFA I believe? Makes sense to max out the remaining RFA years if going bridge but definitely not walking him right to UFA
|
A 4 year deal would take him right to UFA eligibility.
Safe to say it will either be a bridge of 3 years or fewer, or it will buy some UFA years and be 5 or longer.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:50 AM
|
#358
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I know Peterka is a young prolific points producer but I'd still prefer to see the Flames use their available trade assets towards a center.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:53 AM
|
#359
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
A 4 year deal would take him right to UFA eligibility.
Safe to say it will either be a bridge of 3 years or fewer, or it will buy some UFA years and be 5 or longer.
|
He has only been in the league 2 years so would he still not be a 27 year old RFA in 4 years?
|
|
|
06-20-2025, 11:58 AM
|
#360
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
He has only been in the league 2 years so would he still not be a 27 year old RFA in 4 years?
|
Players become UFA eligible at 27 regardless of how many seasons they have played.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 AM.
|
|