Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2013, 11:43 AM   #341
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Not a bad attempt, but at the same time, I don't think it's the direction the team needs to go in.

Calgary needs to draft two or three roster players out of this draft and do the same next year. In year three, sell everything to get Connor McDavid. Right now though, need bodies.

Need to draft and season guys like Seabrook, Hjalmarsson, Bolland and then trade some serious pieces to move up for home-runs.

You get a bunch of home runs now, you're in the situations the oilers find themselves in: A bunch of high priced young talent without roleplayers and cap friendly Entry Level deals that allow you to win.

Would not have lost my mind to draft Jones or McKinnon, though.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 11:47 AM   #342
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
If Detroit had not let in those 2 stinker goals and the flames were drafting 3rd, i bet the Av's would have made the trade down to 3rd with only the 28th pick included, maybe even a roster player instead. Roy has said a couple of times that he wants one of the big 3. I think the only teams they will listen to are Florida and Tampa.
Are people still on about that? Yeah it sucks we won those games down the stretch but teams like Carolina and Tampa out-tanked us when they already have elite talent. At least with teams like the Preds they actually put in a full effort, they just weren't good enough. In terms of who needs the top 3 picks i would say the Flames, Preds and Panthers need them the most.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 11:58 AM   #343
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

I'm happy to see Feaster wheeling and dealing.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 11:58 AM   #344
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Really of all the teams in the top 7 in the draft, the Flames are the one who should be the most patient. Sure it's 4 non playoff years, but the other teams already have several key players in place, or in the case of Florida have been so bad for so long, they can't force another 3 year rebuild on their fan base.

So that alone will make it tough to move up because other teams want a player to step in now and make their team better or they will be looking at a lot of empty seats in the final third of their season. The Flames are the team in this group who are entering a rebuild, and don't have the 2-3 star type players on their roster.

I don't blame them for trying, but they are in a phase where collecting assets for a couple years, than getting a couple high end talents in the next draft may not be such a bad thing. The key is to have 5-6 good players under 25 in place as the 3-6 defenceman, or 4-9 forward spots when the top end talents come into the lineup.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:00 PM   #345
gonzo29
Scoring Winger
 
gonzo29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Had this happened I would've been upset about not having the 3 picks for about 1.5 seconds, then thrilled at the fact that we'd be getting the frigging first overall pick. No problem with that attempt at all.
gonzo29 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gonzo29 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:08 PM   #346
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo29 View Post
Had this happened I would've been upset about not having the 3 picks for about 1.5 seconds, then thrilled at the fact that we'd be getting the frigging first overall pick. No problem with that attempt at all.
Ya, I guess I would likely react that way too, I guess... Anyway, I just hope Feaster isn't keen on adding much more to that offer in an attempt to land Mackinnon
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 12:12 PM   #347
kn
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Teams at the top are giving up a sure thing so picks alone won't do it; they will want top young players already in the NHL. The only two we have are Baertschi and Brodie. It likely will take 6, 22, 28, and either Baertschi or Brodie and even then it may not be enough if neither player is highly rated by the other team.

I like MacKinnon as much as the next guy but if 6, 22, 28 doesn't get it done, I'm not sure I want to throw in Baertschi or Brodie.

I think Gio is overrated by Flames' fans and adds nothing to the pot. Plus, doesn't he have a NTC/NMC? I can't remember since the organization hands them out like candy.
kn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kn For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:14 PM   #348
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertuzzied View Post
Not interested in changing my name but I'll give you $50 if the Flames finish in the bottom5 and you give me $20 if they don't.
You have got yourself a deal!
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:20 PM   #349
icecube
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
Exp:
Default

Witness! Pecentage?
icecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to icecube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:27 PM   #350
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Dater says the Avs won't trade out of the top 3:
http://blogs.denverpost.com/avs/2013...-1-pick/13849/
Quote:
There was no chance of the Avs accepting Calgary’s offer for one very good reason too: they hate the Flames, over the Ryan O’Reilly offer sheet. Those in Avs management still around from last year would rather walk on hot coals from Santa Fe to Saskatoon before doing the Flames any favors.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:44 PM   #351
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Yep i'm sure the Av's front office is not happy about the offer sheet and its going to take time for them to get over it. It was one thing to do an offer sheet, but a whole other thing to do it 2 hours before the puck dropped in their home building. I can imagine with what little fan base that showed up to that game, that they were bitching and moaning that management should have taken care of ROR way before that.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 12:50 PM   #352
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Husky View Post
Id rather the Flames get 1 very solid asset with #6 and 2 solid assets with the other first round picks.
I'm sure a lot of people would love that, but we need accept the reality that even in a strong draft, the 22nd and 28th picks on their own are unlikely to yield impact NHL players, let alone assuming that both of them will.

This would have been a steal of a deal for the Flames.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-16-2013 at 12:55 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 12:52 PM   #353
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

If the Avs turn down an offer that may help them because of hurt feelings, they are a much worse run team than the Flames.
Zevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 12:56 PM   #354
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino View Post
I think those wanting Lindholm or Barkov need to remember the Feaster has stated they want the first rounders to come in and compete for a spot this coming training camp. Both of them will not be in North America next year.
You're guaranteeing that? Lindholm says he'd like to go back to Sweden. But obviously he'd come to training camp. Barkov is NHL ready and could be talked into staying in the NHL IMO.

To suggest we wouldn't take Barkov because he isn't ready right now is little silly IMO. He's clearly one of the more NHL ready prospects despite what he's said about returning to Finland or not.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 12:57 PM   #355
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo View Post
If the Avs turn down an offer that may help them because of hurt feelings, they are a much worse run team than the Flames.

They did not turn it down because of hurt feelings, they turned it down because all along they have said that they want one of the 3 ellite players.

If the Av's pick Jones, i have no doubt Feaster will offer the same thing to Florida and be turned down once again. Florida needs to put buts in the seats and i doubt a marketing campaign of, "come see if Lindholm can make the Panthers in 2 years" will help them.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 01:00 PM   #356
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
I'm sure a lot of people would love that, but we need accept the reality that even in a strong draft, the 22nd and 28th picks on their own are unlikely to yield impact NHL players, let alone assuming that both of them will.

This would have been a steal of a deal for the Flames.
Huh? In a strong draft the #22 and #28 are likely to yield impact NHLers IMO, not unlikely.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2013, 01:05 PM   #357
$ven27
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo View Post
If the Avs turn down an offer that may help them because of hurt feelings, they are a much worse run team than the Flames.
Dater is basically their Eric Francis, anything he says should be ignored.
$ven27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 01:06 PM   #358
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
They did not turn it down because of hurt feelings, they turned it down because all along they have said that they want one of the 3 ellite players.

If the Av's pick Jones, i have no doubt Feaster will offer the same thing to Florida and be turned down once again. Florida needs to put buts in the seats and i doubt a marketing campaign of, "come see if Lindholm can make the Panthers in 2 years" will help them.
I don't doubt that, just responding to the quote sureloss posted.
Zevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 01:07 PM   #359
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

The Flames only need to keep all 3 picks, then proceed to pick the only 2 Fs that will develop into superior players to Mackinnon
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2013, 01:09 PM   #360
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Huh? In a strong draft the #22 and #28 are likely to yield impact NHLers IMO, not unlikely.

Even in 2003, which is considered to be the strongest draft in a generation, only about 6 of the players picked between 20 and 30 are what I personally would consider impact NHLers.

http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/nhl2003e.html
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 06-16-2013 at 01:19 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy