09-30-2012, 07:51 PM
|
#341
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Well f Chris Johnson 3 weeks of crap and now he decides to show up against the best defense he he faced.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-30-2012, 11:03 PM
|
#342
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Why do I play fantasy football? Every week I get so excited only for my team to horribly let me down.
|
|
|
|
|
10-01-2012, 06:05 AM
|
#343
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Well f Chris Johnson 3 weeks of crap and now he decides to show up against the best defense he he faced.
|
Yup, and when I decide to sit him, too.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 06:54 PM
|
#344
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Got a trade proposal. I get Justin Blackmon for Andrew Hawkins. Thoughts?
I know HAwkins has been a deep threat so far this year and Blackmon has been a bit quiet so far but I think the top end potential for Blackmon is there as the Jags dont really have that #1 receiver that Blackmon could turn into by the end of the season.
Hawkins on the other hand seems to be a #2 A/B type with Ben Tate and even Sanu.
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 07:27 AM
|
#345
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
Yeah, I'd make that deal. I have Hawkins on my bench for bye week help but that is all. Like you said, he is a 2 A/B guy. If you want a bench guy that could make a difference and maybe even start later in the year than I agree, Blackmon over Hawkins is the choice.
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 10:02 AM
|
#346
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
Yeah, I'd make that deal. I have Hawkins on my bench for bye week help but that is all. Like you said, he is a 2 A/B guy. If you want a bench guy that could make a difference and maybe even start later in the year than I agree, Blackmon over Hawkins is the choice.
|
I don't agree. Blackmon is already the #1 receiver getting the most targets. Doesn't mean anything cause Blaine Gabbert is throwing to him. Gabberts just not gonna magically get any better and make Blackmon a threat each week. Dalton has a lot of faith in Hawkins and so does the team. They'll continue designing more plays for him to utilize the speed he has. Those WR screens they throw to him are fantastic.
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#347
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
|
Ya maybe I'm just a frustrated Blackmon owner at the moment, but as of right now I'd rather have Hawkins too. Blackmon looked like he had a great rapport in exhibition with Gabbert, but as soon as MJD came back the Jags look back to their ultra-conservative offensive ways. I think I'd rather have Dalton's #2 target in a pass happy O than Gabbert's #1 on a ground & pound O, at least to this point.
Alright I know that none are overly special, but I'm in a 14 team league. On that note, who would you rather have; Jets WR Stephen Hill, Jets WR Jeremy Kerley, or Skins WR Leonard Hankerson?
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 05:38 PM
|
#348
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Need to start 3 out of 5 RBs, standard league.
Forte, Law Firm, Steven Jackson, Battle and/or Bolden.
Thoughts guys?
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#349
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sainters7
Ya maybe I'm just a frustrated Blackmon owner at the moment, but as of right now I'd rather have Hawkins too. Blackmon looked like he had a great rapport in exhibition with Gabbert, but as soon as MJD came back the Jags look back to their ultra-conservative offensive ways. I think I'd rather have Dalton's #2 target in a pass happy O than Gabbert's #1 on a ground & pound O, at least to this point.
Alright I know that none are overly special, but I'm in a 14 team league. On that note, who would you rather have; Jets WR Stephen Hill, Jets WR Jeremy Kerley, or Skins WR Leonard Hankerson?
|
Kerley.
Garcon is just coming back so that should take alot away from HAnkerson and Stephen Hill has done nothing since week 1. Santonio Holmes just dropped for the season and Kerley will be getting more looks. Hill might make a good #2 guy for the same reason, but in my opinion the order of which should be: Kerley, Hill, Hankerson
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DropIt For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-03-2012, 06:13 PM
|
#350
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kobasew19
Need to start 3 out of 5 RBs, standard league.
Forte, Law Firm, Steven Jackson, Battle and/or Bolden.
Thoughts guys?
|
I would probably go with the three starters myself. Battle seemed to benefit from the Chargers benching Mathews on principal and Bolden's entire production came last week alone. Forte has a pretty good matchup to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 08:02 AM
|
#351
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sainters7
Ya maybe I'm just a frustrated Blackmon owner at the moment, but as of right now I'd rather have Hawkins too. Blackmon looked like he had a great rapport in exhibition with Gabbert, but as soon as MJD came back the Jags look back to their ultra-conservative offensive ways. I think I'd rather have Dalton's #2 target in a pass happy O than Gabbert's #1 on a ground & pound O, at least to this point.
Alright I know that none are overly special, but I'm in a 14 team league. On that note, who would you rather have; Jets WR Stephen Hill, Jets WR Jeremy Kerley, or Skins WR Leonard Hankerson?
|
I'd go hankerson, Kerley, Hill. Hankerson is the best receiver of the three. Garcon still not 100% and RG3 likes throwing to Hankerson who's taken over the #2 job because Josh Morgan is an idiot. hankerson had 11 targets last week and has some good downfield ability. Both guys on the Jets could be the #1 or #2 receiver there. Sanchez is not good and when Tebow starts he'll go some games with good downfield passes and some games where he complets 10 passes.
|
|
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 05:32 PM
|
#352
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Ryan Williams tonight against the Rams or Fred Jackson against the 49ers on Sunday?
|
|
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 06:25 PM
|
#353
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Williams for me, but thats a tough one. Spiller is supposed to be back this week along with Jackson so I think that would force my hand
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:00 AM
|
#354
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
Not sure what to do here.
I have to play one of Donald Brown v GB, Or C.J. Spiller/Fred Jackson v SF. Right now I'm leaning to Brown only because the other two are going to split touches and they will have to do it against SF. On the other hand, Brown v GB def isn't ideal either. Any advice?
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 09:30 AM
|
#355
|
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
Not sure what to do here.
I have to play one of Donald Brown v GB, Or C.J. Spiller/Fred Jackson v SF. Right now I'm leaning to Brown only because the other two are going to split touches and they will have to do it against SF. On the other hand, Brown v GB def isn't ideal either. Any advice?
|
Yeah...tough spot. In those cases i usually just defer to the team with the poorer run defense...in this case that is the packers.
I have Brown as well, but am sitting him this week because i have a better option, but i think unless the packers get a lead early, he will get a good dose of touches.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 10:16 AM
|
#356
|
|
Franchise Player
|
My team is a mess this week. Injuries and late scratches.
Plus, I have no idea if Gronkowski is going to start. I think he will, but still kind of up in the air.
__________________
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. I love power.
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 10:27 AM
|
#357
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machiavelli
My team is a mess this week. Injuries and late scratches.
Plus, I have no idea if Gronkowski is going to start. I think he will, but still kind of up in the air.
|
Word is that Gronk willl start but will certainly not be 100 percent. You can guarantee he sees limited snaps.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DropIt For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 02:47 PM
|
#358
|
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Well I'm happy I kept Charles in today...thought about sitting him. I also benefit from a deal to trade Roethlisberger for Andrew Luck today. I made the deal because I have a 2-2 team in a 2 QB league with 2 keepers a year. Essentially taking Luck for future value....but I also like a lot of his matchups going forward, today was one of them.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 03:35 PM
|
#359
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
|
I had Victor Cruz and Ahmad Bradshaw in today... WOW! They combined for 49 points. Easy win this week.
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 10:13 PM
|
#360
|
|
Uncle Chester
|
My opponent beats me 116.49 to 116.46. Sigh. This season has been a nightmare for my fantasy team. 1-4 now.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.
|
|
