Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2015, 10:19 AM   #3481
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I hope it's a retractable roof and not permanently enclosed. Fully enclosed stadiums have pretty much become a thing of the past (although, the new Vikings stadium in Minnesota won't be retractable).
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:22 AM   #3482
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBR View Post
Nothing better than a Stamps home game on a beautiful July/August night.
And nothing worse than a October/November game in the -20 wind and snow.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:24 AM   #3483
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

From the owners' point of view, there's nothing worse than having to mothball the stadium for seven months of every year because it's too freaking cold to use.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:26 AM   #3484
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Indoor or outdoor, any new stadium will be a far superior experience to McMahon at its very best.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:28 AM   #3485
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
Indoor or outdoor, any new stadium will be a far superior experience to McMahon at its very best.
That's true. But that experience will come at a high price tag – too high to justify, I suspect, if the place is only usable from June to October. Hence why I think a roof (retractable or not) has to be part of the plan.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:31 AM   #3486
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Retractable roof would be most people's first choice I'm sure, but if it has to be a choice between open or covered and retractable isn't an option, I pick covered.

As much I enjoy attending a Stamps game in the nice weather, I'll never forget the '93 West final, that was brutally cold.

The outdoor stadium cost us a dynasty in the 90's IMO.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:35 AM   #3487
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Where's Bunk with the information that the Mayor is reviewing this proposal right now with an announcement next week?
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:39 AM   #3488
NiklasSundblad
Crash and Bang Winger
 
NiklasSundblad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacDaddy77 View Post
Where's Bunk with the information that the Mayor is reviewing this proposal right now with an announcement next week?
Bunk has moved on from the mayor's office.
NiklasSundblad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NiklasSundblad For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:43 AM   #3489
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
So who is Richard White, or better yet is he credible?
Writer for the Herald.

http://calgaryherald.com/author/richard-white
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:46 AM   #3490
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

The problem with an open stadium is that while the games sure are nice in August...the games that tend to matter the most, i.e. the late season games and especially the playoffs, are the ones with the poorest attendance. Big important games are memory makers and they turn fairweather fans into long-term fans...and when you're missing 5-10k people in the biggest games of the year, that's a missed opportunity.

Of course if the CFL was smart, it would just start the season a month earlier.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 10:46 AM   #3491
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Retractable > fully covered > fully outdoor. BC Place is actually a really nice place to watch a game since the reno. There is a lot of natural light even with the roof closed (they used a lot of translucent materials and windows), and it doesn't feel stuffy inside. And, of course, it can be somewhat opened up.

Summer nights at McMahon are nice, but we have to be honest with ourselves. Our summer is really short in this climate, and we get a lot of unpredictable weather. Not to mention an extremely wet month of June.

If it were just for the Stamps, an indoor/retractable stadium would be excessive. But there are a lot of concerts that play in larger stadiums, not to mention the possibility of other sports using it. If we had a "proper" stadium, you can bet that we'd have some Women's World Cup games this summer, for example. Also, if there are no major events using it, it will be rented out to local groups to train in during the winter months. It would also provide a massive convention space. I believe that BC Place hosts a number of auto, boat, etc. shows.

Obviously this is still a rumour, but I can see why an indoor or retractable option would be preferred.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:54 AM   #3492
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I know our downtown doesn't need a revitalization. But this project would take it to yet another level.
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:58 AM   #3493
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
Retractable > fully covered > fully outdoor. BC Place is actually a really nice place to watch a game since the reno. There is a lot of natural light even with the roof closed (they used a lot of translucent materials and windows), and it doesn't feel stuffy inside. And, of course, it can be somewhat opened up.
Natural light would be a very high priority if I were in charge of a domed stadium. Cowboys stadium would be where I would model my design from because I think they have really done a lot in terms of bringing in natural light.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calgarygeologist For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 11:01 AM   #3494
calgaryrocks
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

summer games at McMahon are great, however we are talking what 3 games? home opener, then they play one end of July or early August plus maybe one more. so 2/3 the season is in the fall...covered would be nice for playoffs. I agree with the poster that said the important games are in the fall and there are less fans taking these games in - a missed opportunity
__________________
GO FLAMES, STAMPEDERS, ROUGHNECKS, CALVARY, DAWGS and SURGE!
calgaryrocks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:04 AM   #3495
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Natural light would be a very high priority if I were in charge of a domed stadium. Cowboys stadium would be where I would model my design from because I think they have really done a lot in terms of bringing in natural light.
Minnesota...

Spoiler!
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to RM14 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2015, 11:10 AM   #3496
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Minnesota makes a better model for us than Dallas. Designing a building to admit natural light is a lot more difficult in the higher latitudes, and it looks like Minnesota did a good job of tackling that problem.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:16 AM   #3497
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RM14 View Post
Minnesota...

Spoiler!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Minnesota makes a better model for us than Dallas. Designing a building to admit natural light is a lot more difficult in the higher latitudes, and it looks like Minnesota did a good job of tackling that problem.
Minnesota is great but not retractable unlike Dallas. I guess it depends on whether or not a retractable roof actually makes any difference in the overall environment and stadium experience.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:19 AM   #3498
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I went to a game in Indianapolis a couple of years ago, and one thing I didn't like was that even though the roof was open, it didn't feel like you were outside.

I was sitting up in the "cheap" seats under the permanent roof, so it may be a different experience in the lower seats, but from where I was, it just felt like you were inside and someone had cracked a window to let a breeze through.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:19 AM   #3499
Fire It Up
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Default

A retractable roof might also make sense if Flames were ever looking to own an MLS team. Something this big can't just be for a CFL team.
Fire It Up is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:20 AM   #3500
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Fully enclosed stadium is a much worse idea than an open air stadium. More of the season is played in nice weather months than poor weather months.

Retractable roof, or no roof. (partial canopies like Winnipeg or Seattle are ok)
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy