WC Playoffs Round 1: San Jose Sharks vs Los Angeles Kings (Kings win 4-3).

[puckluck2]

Yep, Brown should be getting a call from the NHL.

70.2 Legal Line Change – A player who has entered the game on a legal line change or legally from the penalty bench (penalty time has expired) whostarts an altercation maybe subject to discipline in accordance with Rule 28 – Supplementary Discipline.

Edit:

70.1 Leaving the Bench - No player or goalkeeper may leave the players’ or penalty bench at any time during an altercation or for the purpose of starting an altercation. Substitutions made prior to the altercation shall be permitted provided the players so substituting do not enter the altercation.

[3rd liner]

Take your visor off Burns.... You're getting your ass whooped by Reggie!

[MyFlamesFirst]

Gotta love it. Reminds me of the 04 flames. SJ may lose this game but they aren't going to be happy about it.

[AC]

Attaboy Reggie!

Burns throws a late sucker punch once both linesmen were in between them.

[flamesfan1297]

Originally Posted by dino7c

why would LA bother getting involved in this crap right now...take the win and get outta there

Because San Jose is starting all this crap. Why would they not fight back and send a message?

[puckluck2]

Nice Regehr is a pretty terrible fighter. Glad he held his own.

[dino7c]

Burns with a cheap one after the linesman were in there

[RougeUnderoos]

What an awesome game.

I wish we had a team to cheer for in the playoffs!

[combustiblefuel]

Would of loved seeing Gaborik get destroyed. He tried starting something with Burns the shift earlier. Good thing Muzzin stopped Gaborik the First time. The only reason Burns didn't beat him was regher had his sleeve.

[combustiblefuel]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

Yep, Brown should be getting a call from the NHL.

70.2 Legal Line Change – A player who has entered the game on a legal line change or legally from the penalty bench (penalty time has expired) whostarts an altercation maybe subject to discipline in accordance with Rule 28 – Supplementary Discipline.

Edit:

70.1 Leaving the Bench - No player or goalkeeper may leave the players’ or penalty bench at any time during an altercation or for the purpose of starting an altercation. Substitutions made prior to the altercation shall be permitted provided the players so substituting do not enter the altercation.

What are you on about? The replays showed they were already on a legal line change.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by flamesfan1297

Because San Jose is starting all this crap. Why would they not fight back and send a message?

yeah they are frustrated, keep it that way

Gaborik really wants to get involved with Burns after the game is over

[flamesfan1297]

Originally Posted by combustiblefuel

Would of loved seeing Gaborik get destroyed. He tried starting something with Burns the shift earlier. Good thing Muzzin stopped Gaborik the First time.

I would of loved seeing Burns get destroyed. Cheap shots regehr, throws punches with gloves on before dropping them, then sucker punches when the linesman are already in between them

[3rd liner]

Love the nastiness. Cranky old man Regehr has enough of freakshow burns. Don't have too much against SJ except they have d-bag Torres on their team. He looks like one of those pug dogs with the bugged-out eyes, can't stand him.

[combustiblefuel]

Originally Posted by flamesfan1297

I would of loved seeing Burns get destroyed. Cheap shots regehr, throws punches with gloves on before dropping them, then sucker punches when the linesman are already in between them

Well fight or flight kicked in. Two guys gabbing at you with their sticks and Gaborik sticking his gloves in his face as the thrird guy in. Ya I would to.

[puckluck2]

Originally Posted by combustiblefuel

What are you on about? The replays showed they were already on a legal line change.

It doesn't matter. You can't make a line change and go directly into an altercation. Legal or not. It's not 10 games but maybe a fine.

It even says so in the post you quoted...maybe a little reading instead of snarky comments?

[combustiblefuel]

Originally Posted by puckluck2

It doesn't matter. You can't make a line change and go directly into an altercation. Legal or not. It's not 10 games but maybe a fine.

It even says so in the post you quoted...maybe a little reading instead of snarky comments?

Changed before any altercations started. I stand by that.

[YYC in LAX]

Yeah, I don't understand that hate on Burns here. It's playoff hockey. Burns and Regehr fighting at the end of the game? ####ing awesome! Loved it. Both guys doing their jobs.

[puckluck2]

Originally Posted by combustiblefuel

Changed before any altercations started. I stand by that.

Well ok except that's not what you initially said.

[combustiblefuel]

The line as a whole was changing. I was not saying he had just got on. That's why I used the plural form they instead of him.

[3rd liner]

Sidenote: I'm admittedly not a basketball fan but after watching NHL playoff highlights on sportscentre the NBA playoff 'highlights' look about as exciting and intense as yoga....