Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-2018, 04:37 PM   #301
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
How many Jay Feaster trades gained a positive reaction from the fan base? Cammalleri for Bourque was the only one that comes to mind. Most of Treliving’s deals have been well received.

McDavid is missing the playoffs and an expansion team is leading the west. Outside of Nashville the west is wide open and the Flames would be wise to make a push
Fair points above. I acknowledged the current administration not being shy to make a big move. I just cautioned expectations because the reality of trading a Fox and/or Valimaki and/or Anderson has the potential to shorten our window and limit our ceiling. It is an extremely complicated tradeoff that the management team is trying to perform. An overpayment for a player that doesn't work could backfire significantly as early as next year if we don't make the dance this year and the traded player becomes a serviceable player at entry level salary.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 04:41 PM   #302
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

After looking at the stats for the players on Buffalo I’m thinking there’s not a lot of gold in them there hills.. I wouldn’t sell the farm for anyone on the team not named Eichel. Think about it. All the bad habits these guys have picked up and the time required to turn someone around if possible... maybe someone needs a change? Buffalo is going to have to take a big discount in my mind to get any of, say, Bennett, Brodie, Fox in exchange for their damaged goods
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 04:43 PM   #303
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames View Post
Fair points above. I acknowledged the current administration not being shy to make a big move. I just cautioned expectations because the reality of trading a Fox and/or Valimaki and/or Anderson has the potential to shorten our window and limit our ceiling. It is an extremely complicated tradeoff that the management team is trying to perform. An overpayment for a player that doesn't work could backfire significantly as early as next year if we don't make the dance this year and the traded player becomes a serviceable player at entry level salary.
I absolutely agree. I am actually very much against moving Andersson or Valimaki as I believe both are Flames next season. Andersson might be a full time Flame tomorrow if Stone is trades (doubtful)

Fox is risky to move but I am also not convinced he is going to be anything in the NHL. The Flames have a window that is arguably open now and they need goal scoring.

I trust they won’t make a move involving Fox that only impacts the short term.

The one thing I am somewhat preparing for is an extended Evander Kane on the Flames. I can see how a lot of people are against that. If the Flames trade Fox for a signed Kane then I will get behind it but Kane will need to deliver and this team will need to make the playoffs
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 04:50 PM   #304
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Again, Okposo has produced at a pace more than Backlund... playing in Buffalo without Tavares.
52 point pace vs 53 point pace over the last 2 years. Backlund is a year younger, and arguably a driver on his line that he centers.

The bigger issue is Okposo's lack of production at even strength. He has 20 even strength points this year, 22 last year. Compare that to Backlund's 25 even strength this year and 35 year last year. While not contributing defensively nearly as much Backlund.

He plays with Eichel, O'Reilly and Reinhart on the PP on a stacked first unit power play (which was actually the very best in the league last year).

Okposo has benefit from playing with two top tier centers in the league and has really only shown to be capable of producing (at least in terms of his contract) on their wing.

Away from Tavares and Eichel his offensive stats are really really crappy for a 6M offensive player.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2018, 04:52 PM   #305
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Andersson should be in the NHL next season but almost zero chance Valimaki will be ready for the NHL. He will probably need a couple of seasons in the AHL first.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:01 PM   #306
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

For me, what I would like to see is

Brodie + Ferland + Brouwer + something (In the neighbourhood of Fox/Dube/Gillies etc.) for Okposo + Kane

Bring Andersson up

Set lines like this

Gaudreau-Monahan-Okposo
Tkachuk-Backlund-Kane
Bennett-Jankowski-Frolik
Lazar-Stajan-Hathaway + misc

Gio-Hamilton
Andersson-Hamonic
Kulak-Stone
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2018, 05:02 PM   #307
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

The more I think about it, the more I think Treliving is just entering the discussion to drive up the price. I think he’s heard San Jose was in the mix and so why not throw your hat in there too to make things more expensive for your rivals.

It honestly doesn’t make sense for us to enter a legitimate bidding war when we’re missing how many draft picks, 1 first rounder and 3 seconds? Like why sell the farm when we’re not contenders for a cup?

Boston, Tampa, Nashville, Winnipeg, Las Vegas, Washington and Pittsburgh. These are the true contenders, why outbid them when we don’t even have the picks? It’d be absolutely foolish.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:09 PM   #308
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
The more I think about it, the more I think Treliving is just entering the discussion to drive up the price. I think he’s heard San Jose was in the mix and so why not throw your hat in there too to make things more expensive for your rivals.

It honestly doesn’t make sense for us to enter a legitimate bidding war when we’re missing how many draft picks, 1 first rounder and 3 seconds? Like why sell the farm when we’re not contenders for a cup?

Boston, Tampa, Nashville, Winnipeg, Las Vegas, Washington and Pittsburgh. These are the true contenders, why outbid them when we don’t even have the picks? It’d be absolutely foolish.
This may be the first time in a few weeks I actually agree with what you are saying haha

But yeah I don't see the flames making a big splash, Kane would demand more in salary than the flames internally want to pay and i doubt there's much appetite to part with our good prospects.

Hopefully tre can drive up the prices or at least keep teams tied up until the deadline passes uneventfully
The Boy Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Boy Wonder For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2018, 05:28 PM   #309
Travis Munroe
Realtor®
 
Travis Munroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
For me, what I would like to see is

Brodie + Ferland + Brouwer + something (In the neighbourhood of Fox/Dube/Gillies etc.) for Okposo + Kane

Bring Andersson up

Set lines like this

Gaudreau-Monahan-Okposo
Tkachuk-Backlund-Kane
Bennett-Jankowski-Frolik
Lazar-Stajan-Hathaway + misc

Gio-Hamilton
Andersson-Hamonic
Kulak-Stone
I tried to quote from my phone and it thanked you.....
Ferland and Kane are very similar players. Give Kane the edge for star potential but not to the tune of Brodie and a top prospect. I get the dump of Brouwer and addition of Okoposo is nice but what if next October Kane is gone and we traded Ferland, Brodie, and top prospect for Okoposo.... we would want Tre fired overnight!
__________________

OFFICIAL CP REALTOR & PROPERTY MANAGER
Travis Munroe | Century 21 Elevate | 403.971.4300

Residential Buying & Selling
info@tmunroe.com
www.tmunroe.com

Property Management
travis@mpmCalgary.com
www.mpmCalgary.com
Travis Munroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:37 PM   #310
Travis Munroe
Realtor®
 
Travis Munroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The only thing that makes me think you trade a guy like Ferland is the fact he was showcased on the top line most of the season and has good numbers. This will not be the spot he plays on a deep run nor will he have the same points without top line minutes. I would hate to see Ferland go more than just about any other guy but his stock can’t possibly be any higher right now and when he slides into a 3rd line role moving forward, we may regret not selling him as a top line winger who can play a truculent game.
__________________

OFFICIAL CP REALTOR & PROPERTY MANAGER
Travis Munroe | Century 21 Elevate | 403.971.4300

Residential Buying & Selling
info@tmunroe.com
www.tmunroe.com

Property Management
travis@mpmCalgary.com
www.mpmCalgary.com
Travis Munroe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:56 PM   #311
savardandjokinen
son of looooob
 
savardandjokinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Only guy I'm really interested in from Buffalo is Reinhart, because we can control his contract moving forward and he's versatile, while also being a top 6 player. I'd send back a d prospect and an okay prospect for him, although I'm not sure Buffalo takes it.

Like Kylington/Fox and Klimchuk for Reinhart, but Buffalo might not take it.

If we get him, we can do this once everyone is healthy

Gaudreau-Monahan-Ferland (i think they end up back together at some point)
Tkachuk-Backlund-Frolik
Bennett-Jankowski-Reinhart
Versteeg-Stajan-Brouwer
Lazar, Hathaway
savardandjokinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:57 PM   #312
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camm13 View Post
What your proposing would not even get you Kane, let alone ROR and Nylander on top.
Frolik on the market probably gets you a 1st and a prospect

Fox gets you a 2nd

Bennett gets you a 1st and a prospect

Lazar gets you a 4th

I suspect 2 1sts, a 2nd, a 4th and 2 prospects gets you Kane.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 05:58 PM   #313
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
For me, what I would like to see is

Brodie + Ferland + Brouwer + something (In the neighbourhood of Fox/Dube/Gillies etc.) for Okposo + Kane

Bring Andersson up

Set lines like this

Gaudreau-Monahan-Okposo
Tkachuk-Backlund-Kane
Bennett-Jankowski-Frolik
Lazar-Stajan-Hathaway + misc

Gio-Hamilton
Andersson-Hamonic
Kulak-Stone
Okposo makes 6 million for 4 more years after this. I'd be weary of trading for him unless salary is retained.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:00 PM   #314
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Okposo makes 6 million for 4 more years after this. I'd be weary of trading for him unless salary is retained.
Five more years. Five more years after this one, and he turns 30 in April.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2018, 06:01 PM   #315
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Okposo makes 6 million for 4 more years after this. I'd be weary of trading for him unless salary is retained.
Yeah I feel the Flames get out of Brouwer but get Okposo while also giving up a top 4 D and a guy who has been a top 6 forward for a pending UFA who is barely outproducing Ferland. On top of it all we give up a top prospect.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:03 PM   #316
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

They could be scouting Reinhart for a Bennett swap.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:03 PM   #317
Zoller
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Zoller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Exp:
Default

I could see Buffalo having interest in Adam Fox
Zoller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:04 PM   #318
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by It's a great day 4 hockey View Post
Here's my thoughts on a deal with Buffalo;

Bennett, Brodie, Fox, and Brouwer for Kane, Reinhart and O'Reilly (with 15% retained). If no O'Reilly then no Fox and we get Okposo at 50%. Sign Kane to no more than 4 years at current rate and he gets nothing as far as a no trade.

Just a thought.
Nice thought, but from the Sabres stand point, no GM with two brain cells to rub together is going to take that.

Fox is arguably the best asset in the bunch. Brouwer has control with a no move & if asked to waive his clause to go to buffalo (!?!) would probably say 'go to hell'. Brodie & Bennett.......yeesh. What are you getting? Bennett is a complete question mark, and Brodie looks like a guy just going through the motions, happy to collect his 4.6/year thank you very much.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:06 PM   #319
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Of our defensive prospects the one I’d be most inclined to move is Fox, and it has nothing to do with his college status. I look at the potential in each player and just see Fox as the one with the least potential to be a big contributor. I rank the young defensive prospects in order, Andresson, Valimaki, Kylington, then Fox.

I think Andersson has the most upside in all aspects. He plays a solid defensive game and is excellent in making things happen on the offensive side of the puck. Of the four prospects he has the best shot and consistently gets it through. His skating is not his biggest strength, but his positioning makes up for it. He is ready right now.

Valimaki is probably the most complete of the four. He’s got above average skills in all areas and is just solid on both sides of the puck. His shot is good and he can get it on net. His skating is good and should be a strength for him. I see him knocking on the door in training camp and making the team the following year.

Kylington has such an intriguing skill set. His skating is his greatest strength and what could get him to the NHL. The system would have to change to use this strength, which is why I am questioning if he can make the next level, with the Flames.

Fox is last in the mix, not because he is a bad prospect, just the one with the longest shot to make the NHL. Fox is undersized and is not a great skater. His defensive game is okay, but his offense is what gets people excited. My only question is does that game translate to the next level? Fox is smart, but he uses time and space to make to his plays, something that you don’t get a ton of in the NHL. He also doesn’t have a great shot, being similar to Brodie in that regard. That’s a lot working against him. Yes, he is a good prospect, but he has a long way to go. If someone is willing to assume the risk and pay you a good return, I’d be inclined to move Fox for the immediate return.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 06:06 PM   #320
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Fox and Bennett for Kane and Reinhart is workable assuming Kane re-Signs.

Personally I feel Fox has more value than Kane at the moment and Reinhart more than Benny. With Reinhart being a right shot and Kane being able to replace Bennett the deal makes sense to me
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy