04-20-2016, 10:50 PM
|
#301
|
First Line Centre
|
3-2 now. Squeaky bum time for San Jose
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:50 PM
|
#302
|
Franchise Player
|
Oh boy, SJ better figure this out.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:50 PM
|
#303
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan1297
No I agree that it is terribly inconsistent, and that needs to be fixed. Goalie interference needs to be more clearly defined. All I'm saying is that I have no problem with that particular goal counting
|
fair enough...I just remember the one with Quick and Colborne in early April and it boggles the mind to think what one counted and what one didn't
Well looks like we have a game!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:50 PM
|
#304
|
Franchise Player
|
and of course the kings would turn schenn of all pylons into a top 4 defenceman
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:50 PM
|
#305
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Kings not going down quietly.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:52 PM
|
#306
|
Franchise Player
|
So just a poll of the people watching... if you were to place a bet on who will win this game, who would it be on?
Probably LA, right?
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:52 PM
|
#307
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
That should've been icing. I rewound it back. Muzzin dumps it in 5 get before the center line.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:52 PM
|
#308
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
So just a poll of the people watching... if you were to place a bet on who will win this game, who would it be on?
Probably LA, right?
|
Still SJ for me.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:53 PM
|
#309
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
So crazy these two teams missed the playoffs last year. They're both beastly.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:53 PM
|
#311
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
10 minutes ago the Sharks seemed (to me) like they were going to break this weird thing they have. Now it seems like they could give it all away. Again. They are getting killed.
Also, if Jones just had his stick where it should be on that second Kings goal, it's not a second Kings goal.
Last edited by RougeUnderoos; 04-20-2016 at 10:55 PM.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:53 PM
|
#312
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
fair enough...I just remember the one with Quick and Colborne in early April and it boggles the mind to think what one counted and what one didn't
Well looks like we have a game!
|
Yeah I remember that too. I guess maybe it depends on the refs interpretation of the play. These calls would likely be more consistent if the review went to Toronto and it was the same guys.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:54 PM
|
#313
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:55 PM
|
#314
|
Franchise Player
|
Yup. That's not even close.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:55 PM
|
#315
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
|
seems like the referees have always given a lot of leeway on icings.
If you are within 5 feet of the red line, they usually let it go.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:56 PM
|
#316
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
|
That's not even close. If offsides can be challenged icings should be as well
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:56 PM
|
#317
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
seems like the referees have always given a lot of leeway on icings.
If you are within 5 feet of the red line, they usually let it go.
|
You don't see it that far off very often
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 10:57 PM
|
#318
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M*A*S*H 4077
That's not even close. If offsides can be challenged icings should be as well
|
Only offsides resulting in a goal though.
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 11:00 PM
|
#319
|
Franchise Player
|
I wonder what the under/over for challenges was for the first round?
__________________
----------
must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
|
|
|
04-20-2016, 11:00 PM
|
#320
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
You don't see it that far off very often
|
correct, it's rare to see it that bad, but it does happen.
the problem is the the inability of officials to call the game as it reads in the rule book.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.
|
|