Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2016, 10:50 PM   #301
soreshins
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Exp:
Default

3-2 now. Squeaky bum time for San Jose
soreshins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:50 PM   #302
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Oh boy, SJ better figure this out.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:50 PM   #303
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesfan1297 View Post
No I agree that it is terribly inconsistent, and that needs to be fixed. Goalie interference needs to be more clearly defined. All I'm saying is that I have no problem with that particular goal counting
fair enough...I just remember the one with Quick and Colborne in early April and it boggles the mind to think what one counted and what one didn't

Well looks like we have a game!
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2016, 10:50 PM   #304
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

and of course the kings would turn schenn of all pylons into a top 4 defenceman
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:50 PM   #305
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Kings not going down quietly.
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:52 PM   #306
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

So just a poll of the people watching... if you were to place a bet on who will win this game, who would it be on?

Probably LA, right?
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:52 PM   #307
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

That should've been icing. I rewound it back. Muzzin dumps it in 5 get before the center line.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:52 PM   #308
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
So just a poll of the people watching... if you were to place a bet on who will win this game, who would it be on?

Probably LA, right?
Still SJ for me.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:53 PM   #309
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

So crazy these two teams missed the playoffs last year. They're both beastly.
GoJetsGo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:53 PM   #310
hwy19man
Franchise Player
 
hwy19man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

The Sharks are playing hang on and this should be a thrilling finish!
__________________
----------

must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
hwy19man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:53 PM   #311
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

10 minutes ago the Sharks seemed (to me) like they were going to break this weird thing they have. Now it seems like they could give it all away. Again. They are getting killed.

Also, if Jones just had his stick where it should be on that second Kings goal, it's not a second Kings goal.
__________________


Last edited by RougeUnderoos; 04-20-2016 at 10:55 PM.
RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:53 PM   #312
flamesfan1297
First Line Centre
 
flamesfan1297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
fair enough...I just remember the one with Quick and Colborne in early April and it boggles the mind to think what one counted and what one didn't

Well looks like we have a game!
Yeah I remember that too. I guess maybe it depends on the refs interpretation of the play. These calls would likely be more consistent if the review went to Toronto and it was the same guys.
flamesfan1297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:54 PM   #313
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Spoilered for size
Spoiler!
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:55 PM   #314
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Yup. That's not even close.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:55 PM   #315
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Spoilered for size
Spoiler!
seems like the referees have always given a lot of leeway on icings.

If you are within 5 feet of the red line, they usually let it go.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:56 PM   #316
M*A*S*H 4077
Franchise Player
 
M*A*S*H 4077's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Spoilered for size
Spoiler!
That's not even close. If offsides can be challenged icings should be as well
M*A*S*H 4077 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:56 PM   #317
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
seems like the referees have always given a lot of leeway on icings.

If you are within 5 feet of the red line, they usually let it go.
You don't see it that far off very often
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:57 PM   #318
flamesfan1297
First Line Centre
 
flamesfan1297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: I will never cheer for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M*A*S*H 4077 View Post
That's not even close. If offsides can be challenged icings should be as well
Only offsides resulting in a goal though.
flamesfan1297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 11:00 PM   #319
hwy19man
Franchise Player
 
hwy19man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I wonder what the under/over for challenges was for the first round?
__________________
----------

must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
hwy19man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 11:00 PM   #320
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
You don't see it that far off very often
correct, it's rare to see it that bad, but it does happen.

the problem is the the inability of officials to call the game as it reads in the rule book.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy