Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2014, 02:29 PM   #301
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
True but he is an actual nhl vet that can help the leadership also... I've always loved the guy I guess.
Sure, and maybe the Flames talked to him but found out he wasn't interested in coming here at all.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:32 PM   #302
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I was trying to think of who the signing reminded me of........... It reminds me a lot of the Jim Vandermeer signing a few years back. Rough and tumble bottom paring D-man who also spent some time at forward.

FWIW Vandermeer had signed a 3 year term at the time for 2.3 AAV in 2008-09
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2014, 02:33 PM   #303
GettinIggyWithIt
Scoring Winger
 
GettinIggyWithIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaparraljam View Post
"I don't see us being bottom three, not quite in the playoffs but somewhere in between." That's the absolute worst place to be.

Better than last year? Unlikely to be bottom 3? Who will be lower? BUF, FLA, and EDM all got better since the season ended. We swapped Cammalleri for Raymond (lose big), Bollig for Westgarth (win), Engelland for Butler (tie) and maybe Johnny Hockey and Sven for Byron and Galiardi (TBD).
Yes that's right. Like I said it's my opinion. Your prediction is no better than mine. It's based on adding a solid goalie, having prospects that are likely going to be ready to make the jump and contribute, the team getting better through the season last year and the additions they've made. Buffalo, Edm, Ott, NJ, Isles, Canes and a few others could all be worse. There are a lot of teams that are very close to each other. Did you predict the order of finish of the ten worst teams last year? Doubt it.

BTW You made this same post in another thread before you edited it slightly. Any reason why you feel the need to cut and paste your posts?
GettinIggyWithIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:34 PM   #304
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

GM just said on the radio that he was looking for a longer term, they had to pay more to get the 3 year term. They were able to be more "aggressive" because they had flexibility.

Trying hard to say aggressive instead of overpaying
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2014, 02:34 PM   #305
GettinIggyWithIt
Scoring Winger
 
GettinIggyWithIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaparraljam View Post
"I don't see us being bottom three, not quite in the playoffs but somewhere in between." That's the absolute worst place to be.
No - the worst place to be is not improving (see Edmonton).
GettinIggyWithIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:38 PM   #306
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2014, 02:40 PM   #307
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

It's obviously an over-payment, but apparently there was a bidding war for him so he must have some positives. Won't hurt the team long term with the salary cap, because the Flames will unlikely be pressed up against the cap the next 3 seasons. Like Treliving said he will be a good mentor for the young players on this team. Plus he is a RH shot which most people here salivate over.

Only two players will probably be asking for big raises for 2015-16: Brodie and Backlund
In 2016-17 you have: Monahan, Gaudreau, Giordano up for new contracts.

So I don't see his contract as an issue.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:41 PM   #308
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4oh3 View Post
Are we at the floor though now?
CapGeek is showing the Flames just over a million from the floor with 18 players on the NHL roster.

Fill out the roster with just league minimum players, and they're well above the floor.

At this point, they could trade Wideman without retaining any salary and still expect to be above the floor.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:41 PM   #309
Igottago
Franchise Player
 
Igottago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Meh. I almost thinking signing a guy like this is just so the Flames don't destroy the confidence of young up and coming d-men. Like, we're going to pay you really well to enjoy getting beat badly while we rebuild.
__________________
A few weeks after crashing head-first into the boards (denting his helmet and being unable to move for a little while) following a hit from behind by Bob Errey, the Calgary Flames player explains:

"I was like Christ, lying on my back, with my arms outstretched, crucified"
-- Frank Musil - Early January 1994
Igottago is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:42 PM   #310
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
yep.

Once again, here on CP, if anyone disagrees, they are crying babies who are overreacting. The Flames simply cannot do any wrong. Sorry, I forgot.

Most posters in this thread thought this was a terrible contract before I even posted. Once I did, the wolves were on me like clockwork.
Here's the thing. If you had just said, "god, what a terrible contract. We overpaid", a lot of people would agree with you. Hell, I agree with you. We overpaid. I just don't care about the dollars because the term isn't horrible and we are in no danger of getting cap screwed in these next three years.

However, you felt the need to make the same "Burke sucks" post FOUR TIMES in SIX minutes.

We heard you the first time. And the second.

And the third.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2014, 02:44 PM   #311
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Overpayment for sure, but I wouldn't quite call it a bad contract. Term is fine, we gotta hit the floor, I like the guy overall. Hope that money isn't a proble in the next few years, but I don't see it being an issue.

Fine with the signing. Now what's the starting lineup for the home opener v Vancouver?
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:45 PM   #312
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Here's the thing. If you had just said, "god, what a terrible contract. We overpaid", a lot of people would agree with you. Hell, I agree with you. We overpaid. I just don't care about the dollars because the term isn't horrible and we are in no danger of getting cap screwed in these next three years.

However, you felt the need to make the same "Burke sucks" post FOUR TIMES in SIX minutes.

We heard you the first time. And the second.

And the third.
I never said Burke sucks. I have never said Burke sucks.

If I remember correctly you were one of the few on CP against hiring Burke as our president at the time.

All I said is that this is a Burke move. I never critiqued him as a manager.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:48 PM   #313
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I never said Burke sucks. I have never said Burke sucks.

If I remember correctly you were one of the few on CP against hiring Burke as our president at the time.

All I said is that this is a Burke move. I never critiqued him as a manager.
No, I am not a fan of Burke. However, my opinion of Burke is irrelevant to your posting style. As to the rest, I call bullcrap. Certainly your incessant complaining about "Burke moves" makes your opinion clear. But just in case we didn't hear you the first million times, you'll no doubt post it again, and again, and again...
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:50 PM   #314
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
No, I am not a fan of Burke. However, my opinion of Burke is irrelevant to your posting style. As to the rest, I call bullcrap. Certainly your incessant complaining about "Burke moves" makes your opinion clear. But just in case we didn't hear you the first million times, you'll no doubt post it again, and again, and again...
What is a Burke move?

Constantly fleecing all other managers who he makes trades with?

An unhealthy obsession with big, gritty hockey players?

These are observations of trends. They can be positive and negative.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:50 PM   #315
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Honestly, in the situation the Flames are in, evaluating whether a signing is good or not doesn't involve looking at the salary number.

I'd rather the Flames have signed Engelland at $6.9 million a season than at $0.9 million a season. $0.9 million means that the Flames might have had to sign ANOTHER player to get to the cap floor.

In the Flames situation in getting to the cap floor, overpayment is better than underpayment for players like this.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:51 PM   #316
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I never said Burke sucks. I have never said Burke sucks.

If I remember correctly you were one of the few on CP against hiring Burke as our president at the time.

All I said is that this is a Burke move. I never critiqued him as a manager.
Your posts were an overreaction followed by a bunch of extrapolation of what you hope this move doesn't mean, questioning managements direction and who is directing the ship.

I don't love this signing either, but at worst it will be a minor mistake given this clubs situation, and I'm willing to bet the management team is fully aware they overpaid and what the minor risks are.

But that's just it, it's at worst a slight overpayment we can afford so there's no need to get uber concerned or uber critical. The Flames had a pretty good day, let's feel good about that, versus looking for any minor piece of ammunition to jump on and overreact to so that you can attempt to justify your opinion or hypothesis' on Burke.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:57 PM   #317
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Honestly, in the situation the Flames are in, evaluating whether a signing is good or not doesn't involve looking at the salary number.

I'd rather the Flames have signed Engelland at $6.9 million a season than at $0.9 million a season. $0.9 million means that the Flames might have had to sign ANOTHER player to get to the cap floor.

In the Flames situation in getting to the cap floor, overpayment is better than underpayment for players like this.
Umm...I totally disagree with this thinking. I'd MUCH prefer Engelland at $0.9M (compared to $6.9M) and I would be ecstatic if the "downside" was that we had an extra $6M to spend on someone else. Chances are that person making $6M per year can help our team win! Why on earth would it makes sense to overpay by ridiculous amounts just so we can check off "hit the cap floor" on our list?!
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:57 PM   #318
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

I learned a couple things today.

I learned that there are a lot of fans that want a good value free agent signing no matter what the circumstances are surrounding the team need, the market, or the player in question.

I also learned that I, as a 34 year old right handed person who is over 6 foot and 220 lbs. who has never played hockey in my life, have a good chance of being signed as a right handed defenseman for the league minimum because the demand is that high. I will gladly split my $575 K salary next year with anyone who can get me into game shape in time.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-01-2014, 02:58 PM   #319
5by5
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

An extra mill or two to protect our best assets during their acclimation with the league is worthwhile to me. JG/Mon/K2 can all use a few body guards. Never ever can we let happen to our guys what happens to Crosby every year. Wait a minute, I just realized... Engelland was the guy that was supposed to be protecting Crosby.
5by5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:59 PM   #320
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Seems like a lot for a depth defenseman, but prices have been high for d-men for a while. Probably a fine deal.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy