Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2016, 01:29 PM   #2981
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Listening to Friedman on the Fan today and I was thinking about the goalie situation. While the Flames could probably put together a package of picks for Bishop, what would he command salary wise the year after next? Could it be closer to $8m? While they may have to pony up and additional pick or prospect to make a deal with Anaheim, Andersen would probably cost a fraction of that. Closer to $3m. Thoughts?

Last edited by Toonage; 04-22-2016 at 01:32 PM.
Toonage is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 01:29 PM   #2982
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Would be sweet to do something like -

Use our 1st at 2nd Overall to draft Laine.

Trade the Panthers 2nd Rounder for Kevin Hayes

Trade the Stars first rounder for Bishop or Andersen.

That would be a pretty sweet outcome on draft day.

Gaudreau - Monahan - Hayes
Colborne - Bennett - Laine
Frolik - Backlund - Pribyl
Ferland - Stajan - Bouma

Suddenly our forward group isn't that small anymore, and we have a strong goalie.

One can dream.

I think that's possibly the best possible outcome.
I'd settle for any part of that really.
Moneyhands23 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 01:36 PM   #2983
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
The Avs seem to suffer from the same ailment Boston & Edmonton have. Alumnitis.
I think Joe Sakic and Patrick Roy know a thing or two about winning, if there's ever any concern.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2016, 01:37 PM   #2984
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Listening to Friedman on the Fan today and I was thinking about the goalie situation. While the Flames could probably put together a package of picks for Bishop, what would he command salary wise the year after next? Could it be closer to $8m? While they may have to pony up and additional pick or prospect to make a deal with Anaheim, Andersen would probably cost a fraction of that. Closer to $3m. Thoughts?
I think it depends on how far Andersen takes the Dicks in the playoffs. If they win the Cup or even get to the finals on his back he is going to cost a lot more.
dissentowner is online now  
Old 04-22-2016, 01:42 PM   #2985
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
The Avs seem to suffer from the same ailment Boston & Edmonton have. Alumnitis.
Makes you appreciate how quickly Burke shot down "Conroy for GM" a few years back.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 01:42 PM   #2986
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I think if it's Andersen you are looking at between $5M & $6M for a cap hit, and for Bishop it's between $6 & $7M - rare for goalies to make above $7M in the NHL today.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 01:55 PM   #2987
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

My thoughts are Andersen likely gets moved to the Islanders or Leafs as they both need starting goalies. Unless the Flames overpay I don't see the Ducks trading him in the division
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:00 PM   #2988
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
My thoughts are Andersen likely gets moved to the Islanders or Leafs as they both need starting goalies. Unless the Flames overpay I don't see the Ducks trading him in the division
Yeah I don't see Anderson being an option unless the Flames are willing to severely overpay. If the Sharks can finish the job on the Kings, Bob Murray doesn't have to look far to see that you can be haunted by an ex-goaltender being shipped within the division.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:23 PM   #2989
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
My thoughts are Andersen likely gets moved to the Islanders or Leafs as they both need starting goalies. Unless the Flames overpay I don't see the Ducks trading him in the division
how do the Islanders need a starter?
__________________
In Treliving We Trust!
Demetric is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:29 PM   #2990
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I think Bishop should be the #1 target...realistic or not time will tell
dino7c is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:32 PM   #2991
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The goalie situation is so fluid, but depending on the expansion draft, there could be a number of intriguing options. Ducks might need to move one of Andersen/Gibson. If not in-division, then there is Fleury/Murray, Bishop/Vasilevsky. With Elliot playing so well, do the Blues move Allen? Throw in a few workable UFAs, and the Flames situation pretty much has to be better than last year, at likely a better price.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:45 PM   #2992
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Is it a money thing with Bishop in Tampa or is Vasilevskiy that close?

He pretty much won them that game last night against Detroit.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:48 PM   #2993
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Is it a money thing with Bishop in Tampa or is Vasilevskiy that close?

He pretty much won them that game last night against Detroit.
The thought was it is a money thing combined with the risk of an expansion draft but Friedman was saying that may change.

He was team MVP this year and it appears that the team may need him more than Stamkos in order to succeed.

If Stamkos ends up leaving then it is doubtful that Bishop gets moved IMO.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:49 PM   #2994
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Is it a money thing with Bishop in Tampa or is Vasilevskiy that close?

He pretty much won them that game last night against Detroit.
I think it's an expansion draft thing
neo45 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 02:50 PM   #2995
Imported_Aussie
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
My thoughts are Andersen likely gets moved to the Islanders or Leafs as they both need starting goalies. Unless the Flames overpay I don't see the Ducks trading him in the division
The Islanders have 2 starters - Halak and Greiss. They would be shedding a goalie before adding one, or rolling with a 1a/1b model
Imported_Aussie is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Imported_Aussie For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2016, 02:56 PM   #2996
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I imagine they would get permission to work out an extension with Bishop prior to a trade. I don't mind giving up assets to aquire him if we have him for another 4 years.
Jacks is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 03:00 PM   #2997
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
I imagine they would get permission to work out an extension with Bishop prior to a trade. I don't mind giving up assets to aquire him if we have him for another 4 years.
4 years seems like a short contract for him to sign. Not saying impossible but usually guys in that position will push for 6-7 years
neo45 is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 03:07 PM   #2998
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
4 years seems like a short contract for him to sign. Not saying impossible but usually guys in that position will push for 6-7 years
He'll be on the back half of 30 years old when his next contract kicks in, I wouldn't do 6-7 years. Plus we will hopefully have some tending coming down the pipe in a few years if Gilles or MacDonald pan out.
Jacks is offline  
Old 04-22-2016, 03:31 PM   #2999
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

I have a feeling Bishop is going to be one of the hardest hit by the new goalie equipment rules. I'd rather not trade for him, at least not before seeing how the changes affect him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2016, 04:05 PM   #3000
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
I have a feeling Bishop is going to be one of the hardest hit by the new goalie equipment rules. I'd rather not trade for him, at least not before seeing how the changes affect him.
This sentiment is out there but if you saw last nights game you would change your opinion.

His lateral movement was crisp and quick. He stopped 3 breakaways.

Friedman said this morning that he and everyone thought Bishop would be the odd man out but if he continues to play like this then Yzerman might just keep him. Proven thing over what might be.

Last edited by Da_Chief; 04-22-2016 at 04:14 PM.
Da_Chief is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021