Well I literally changed my pick at the last minute after wanting to pick someone else, but I need someone to discipline Ovechkin. So I'll go with Will Arnett... I mean Brendan Shanahan.
Fetisov was already taken so it wouldn't had mattered. Anyhow with the 85th pick, team Ninja is pleased to select, from Jonquiere, Quebec: Pierre Pilote
Shore and him as my top pairing? Me likey.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Last edited by Hockey_Ninja; 08-24-2013 at 02:09 AM.
Fetisov was already taken so it wouldn't had mattered. Anyhow with the 85th pick, team Ninja is pleased to select, from Jonquiere, Quebec: Pierre Pilote
Shore and him as my top pairing? Me likey.
The Following User Says Thank You to trackercowe For This Useful Post:
God dammit you guys are killing my all-time fantasy team. Out of the last 12 picks i was hoping at least one of those players would fall to me. Hell i was hoping to get Malkin in the 6th round. Time for you guys to pick only former flames so i can build up my team the way i envisioned it.
Scrach that ... you guys can pick only former Canucks.
It seems that people are picking players from more recent years. You guys need to start picking players from the 50's and 60's. Leave the 80's, 90's and 00's for me.
I'm trying to stick to players I've seen in my lifetime. But this time around everyone I thought would fall to later rounds are being snatched up faster than smarties in a fat camp.
New rule: If you are one of the upcoming 3 picks in the thread title you can pick at any time. First come, first served. Just to move things along quicker. powderjunkie and Iniggywetrust can pick at any time.
New rule: If you are one of the upcoming 3 picks in the thread title you can pick at any time. First come, first served. Just to move things along quicker. powderjunkie and Iniggywetrust can pick at any time.
That is absolutely freaking moronic. So if someone takes someone that I wanted picks after me I would be kinda of pissed and rightfully so that I lost on that said player Why not just go with a time limit instead? Say like 12 hours to get things rolling. I'm not going to name names but there is only a select few who take forever for to make there picks.
That is absolutely freaking moronic. So if someone takes someone that I wanted picks after me I would be kinda of pissed and rightfully so that I lost on that said player Why not just go with a time limit instead? Say like 12 hours to get things rolling. I'm not going to name names but there is only a select few who take forever for to make there picks.
.....Well fine then. If someone takes forever then the next two guys can jump in and pick. Is that fine?
That is absolutely freaking moronic. So if someone takes someone that I wanted picks after me I would be kinda of pissed and rightfully so that I lost on that said player Why not just go with a time limit instead? Say like 12 hours to get things rolling. I'm not going to name names but there is only a select few who take forever for to make there picks.
If we go time limit the person should just get skipped and they can make there pick anytime after that
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey For This Useful Post:
