[PGT] Flames fall to Coyotes 4-0 - A whole lot of NOTHIN'

[skcli]

Originally Posted by Teroy

Says it all:

Jarome Iginla, Michael Cammalleri, Alex Tanguay — were each minus-two. That unit’s total contribution to the attack was two shots.

And all they did were drop passes or skating around losing the pucks

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally Posted by Teroy

Says it all:

Jarome Iginla, Michael Cammalleri, Alex Tanguay — were each minus-two. That unit’s total contribution to the attack was two shots.

No it doesn't. Which two goals were they on for? If it was the last two how can you fault anyone but Taylor? No credit at all to Phoenix for playing a nearly flawless defensive game?

[Teroy]

Next I'm sure you'll want to know "which two shots".

[Frank MetaMusil]

Originally Posted by EddyBeers

The Flames are always exciting though, you never know what you are going to get. Some nights you get lots of goals and super entertaining hockey and the odd win, other nights you get a piss poor effort and no goals. That is way more exciting than consistent winning boring hockey.

The Flames are like a box of chocolates, you never know what you are going to get. And they play hockey like Forrest Gump lives life, confused, bewildered but you just cannot help but cheer for them at the end of the day.

LOL, your grating sense of humor actually made me laugh this time. You've got a valid point.

Maybe we'll get to witness another boring 9 losses in a row. No one knows what to expect, but I guess there's less of a chance of that happening in a short season. Perhaps a 9-0 or 9-1 blowout?

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally Posted by Teroy

Next I'm sure you'll want to know "which two shots".

That doesn't make any sense.

[DeluxeMoustache]

Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan

No it doesn't. Which two goals were they on for? If it was the last two how can you fault anyone but Taylor? No credit at all to Phoenix for playing a nearly flawless defensive game?

People need to knock off the nonsense about Iggy's defensive game.

Goal 1: CGY on ice - 7, 26, 10, 24, 51 - net front / forward coverage let Yandle in
Goal 2: 4, 5, 12, 13, 40 - deflection off Taylor's right knee (no forward's fault, this all on Taylor)
Goal 3: 7, 26, 12, 13, 40 - the dogpile. Taylor couldn't handle the rebound and Vermette actually looked to have tripped Wideman who was in position. Not on Iggy.
Goal 4: 6, 44, 18, 20, 22 - top corner

[CaramonLS]

Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan

No it doesn't. Which two goals were they on for? If it was the last two how can you fault anyone but Taylor? No credit at all to Phoenix for playing a nearly flawless defensive game?

They were on there for the 2nd and 3rd goals.

[hariton]

Sutter back !

Well, ok,

Olli back !