02-09-2026, 05:57 PM
|
#29781
|
|
Such a pretty girl!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Then there's the fact that per the Clarity Act, the House of Commons has to deem that the question is clear and result in a clear expression of will by the population. If they deem it not to, no negotiations would be entered into for the secession.
__________________
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 06:42 PM
|
#29782
|
|
Franchise Player
|
We should get a poll thread going for how many signatures they claim to get. never mind how many are accepted.
I'm gonna go with, 83,000. But I also bet if anyone bothers looking into it, almost half with be duplicates, because these unscrupulous people, might be to stupid to understand the rules that they are only allowed to sign once, and don't really care about democratic fraud, that just something they say when they think it helps them.
it will be functionally unprovable, but that's my guess they claim 83,000, and if ever audited they find less than 50,000.
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 06:48 PM
|
#29783
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
We should get a poll thread going for how many signatures they claim to get. never mind how many are accepted.
I'm gonna go with, 83,000. But I also bet if anyone bothers looking into it, almost half with be duplicates, because these unscrupulous people, might be to stupid to understand the rules that they are only allowed to sign once, and don't really care about democratic fraud, that just something they say when they think it helps them.
it will be functionally unprovable, but that's my guess they claim 83,000, and if ever audited they find less than 50,000.
|
What do you mean if anyone bothers looking into it? That is very clear part of the whole process and Elections Alberta will bother to look at the signatures and they have methodology in place to affirm the signature total. That methodology was used to verify the previous petitions. Do you not believe in the capacity of Elections Alberta to verify the signatures?
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 07:10 PM
|
#29784
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
What do you mean if anyone bothers looking into it? That is very clear part of the whole process and Elections Alberta will bother to look at the signatures and they have methodology in place to affirm the signature total. That methodology was used to verify the previous petitions. Do you not believe in the capacity of Elections Alberta to verify the signatures?
|
Basically I am predicting that with substantial wrong doing and fraud they will reach roughly half of the reduced total required, so elections Alberta would not validate signatures and it would be irresponsible to throw and bunch of resources at it to affirm they are failures, when they could just announce right away that the separatists are failures. But again, this is just my prediction.
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 07:34 PM
|
#29785
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
Basically I am predicting that with substantial wrong doing and fraud they will reach roughly half of the reduced total required, so elections Alberta would not validate signatures and it would be irresponsible to throw and bunch of resources at it to affirm they are failures, when they could just announce right away that the separatists are failures. But again, this is just my prediction.
|
How is Elections Alberta going to determine that it is a failure without going through the exercise of validating signatures? You want our public institutions to just go off a hunch?
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 07:37 PM
|
#29786
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
They interviewed a seperatist supporter, just a short sound bite
Paraphrasing but went like this 'if the 70% dont like it(seperation) they can just leave, BC and Sask are open for them'
Alrighty then math and democracy genius...
|
|
|
02-09-2026, 07:40 PM
|
#29787
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
We should get a poll thread going for how many signatures they claim to get. never mind how many are accepted.
I'm gonna go with, 83,000. But I also bet if anyone bothers looking into it, almost half with be duplicates, because these unscrupulous people, might be to stupid to understand the rules that they are only allowed to sign once, and don't really care about democratic fraud, that just something they say when they think it helps them.
it will be functionally unprovable, but that's my guess they claim 83,000, and if ever audited they find less than 50,000.
|
You think they’re going to claim 83,000? I’d take the over on that all day. They need 177,000 and they think they’re going to get a million. The claimed amount is going to much higher than 83,000.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-09-2026, 07:47 PM
|
#29788
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
How is Elections Alberta going to determine that it is a failure without going through the exercise of validating signatures? You want our public institutions to just go off a hunch?
|
If the separatists don't claim to have 177,000 Elections Alberta can just confirm the failure, without counting.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 PM.
|
|