Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2021, 01:48 PM   #2921
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
According to the former Canucks SN reporter, we probably are.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1436406185213628416
Why would that matter? Gudbrandson and Stone part of the deal for Eichel?
Unless he is saying it was over a couple weeks ago which wouldn't surprise me

Last edited by Bonded; 09-10-2021 at 01:51 PM.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 01:49 PM   #2922
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Signing a 1.9million dollar popcorn eater is not all that low cost
Yup. All the other ones are irrelevant to the cap because they are at, or basically at, the minimum. However, this one, at nearly $2M, definitely impacts the cap. And for that reason, it warrants criticism.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 01:51 PM   #2923
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Signing a 1.9million dollar popcorn eater is not all that low cost
He will play IMO

1 year under 2M is not going to effect an Eichel deal one way or another is the point
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 01:54 PM   #2924
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Wishful thinking on his part. I can't believe Tre brought in all this D depth for fun.
So we move out an Andersson and replace him with a Gudbranson?

Just sayin
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 01:55 PM   #2925
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
So we move out an Andersson and replace him with a Gudbranson?

Just sayin
If Eichel is coming back we can deal with it
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 01:55 PM   #2926
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
So we move out an Andersson and replace him with a Gudbranson?

Just sayin
I don't think Gudbranson could positively replace Stone let alone Anderson.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 01:56 PM   #2927
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
If Eichel is coming back we can deal with it
That would be one of the worst D cores in the league
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Samonadreau For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 01:57 PM   #2928
Jimdon
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Jimdon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Airdrie, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
If Eichel is coming back we can deal with it
Yes, because having an elite center and crappy defense has led to success for who exactly?
Jimdon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:03 PM   #2929
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

If these signings were going to signal a trade I figure the big trade would be imminent or already announced.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:03 PM   #2930
SnipeShow
Crash and Bang Winger
 
SnipeShow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Got my insiderrrrr info from a bad lunch that caused an upset gut
Gutbranson?

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
SnipeShow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:03 PM   #2931
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

If Andersson is gone, you have
- Hanifin
- Tanev
- Valimaki
- Zadorov
- Gudbranson
- Mackey
- Kylington
- Stone

Assuming no other D are moved, the positive is that there's a lot of bodies for Sutter to pick from to find the best mix.

Going with this D core would be a huge gamble though. You're banking on one of the young D (Valimaki, Mackey, Kylington) to take a step into being a #4 and/or Sutter making Gudbranson and Stone look like NHL defensemen.

But if (big if) Eichel is coming back though I can live with it, and hope that Sutter gets the D to be greater than the sum of its parts.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:04 PM   #2932
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
If Andersson is gone, you have
- Hanifin
- Tanev
- Valimaki
- Zadorov
- Gudbranson
- Mackey
- Kylington
- Stone

Assuming no other D are moved, the positive is that there's a lot of bodies for Sutter to pick from to find the best mix.

Going with this D core would be a huge gamble though. You're banking on one of the young D (Valimaki, Mackey, Kylington) to take a step into being a #4 and/or Sutter making Gudbranson and Stone look like NHL defensemen.

But if (big if) Eichel is coming back though I can live with it, and hope that Sutter gets the D to be greater than the sum of its parts.
What an offensive black hole the Defense will be. May as well go with 5 Forwards on the PP
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 02:06 PM   #2933
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
What an offensive black hole the Defense will be. May as well go with 5 Forwards on the PP

We would be going with the Islanders approach on D with that group for sure.
mile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:08 PM   #2934
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

It’s easier to acquire a middle pairing D at the deadline than an elite center. If this is to unload Andersson in another deal then so be it. Go and grab Eichel.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 02:10 PM   #2935
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I think Valimaki goes in an Eichel trade before Andersson. He fits their timeline and the Flames have more depth on the left side. Tanev is too injury prone and all of a sudden Gudbranson or Stone are on your top pair
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:20 PM   #2936
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Treliving probably fell on his keyboard, and when he looked up, he had signed GuDBrAnSoN to $1.9five MiLL
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 02:24 PM   #2937
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
It’s easier to acquire a middle pairing D at the deadline than an elite center. If this is to unload Andersson in another deal then so be it. Go and grab Eichel.
In a silo yes.

But you would still be ok with Gudbranson in your top 4? We would be the next Oilers.

I gaurantee there are better D out there for the same or less money.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:32 PM   #2938
talladega.25
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
In a silo yes.

But you would still be ok with Gudbranson in your top 4? We would be the next Oilers.

I gaurantee there are better D out there for the same or less money.
Sami Vatanen comes to mind. Would wayyy rather have Sami V back there over Badbranson
talladega.25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2021, 02:47 PM   #2939
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Maybe Hertl is the target. That's all I got.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-10-2021, 02:51 PM   #2940
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by talladega.25 View Post
Sami Vatanen comes to mind. Would wayyy rather have Sami V back there over Badbranson
For a bottom pairing/7th defender who may not even play on a 1 year contract, I can't imagine caring who fills the role for what price.

"This team is bad as built! We are not a contender!"

*signs Gudbranson with remaining cap space*

"WE ARE DOOMED!!!"

People here are funny.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy