12-27-2011, 02:17 PM
|
#2921
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sowa
And Welker enabled NE to do this thus revolutionizing his position. Who was the slot receiver under Belichek before Welker? Bet you can't name him without googling.
|
Can you?
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 02:23 PM
|
#2922
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Can you?
|
Other than Deion Branch, and Troy Brown, I bet most people who weren't Patriot fans can remember who the Patriot receivers were when they were winning Superbowls. A NFL fan with a good memory might remember Patton or Givens, even that's a stretch.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 02:35 PM
|
#2923
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
The entire NFL has changed. Remember when 3rd and 2 or 3rd and 3 was a running down? Now it's almost 100% a throwing down and smaller players like Welker are benefiting.
|
A lot of that is because of 3-4 defensive schemes. A guy like Welker can get away from a middle linebacker for that kind of gain, so long as he can withstand a hit, and has the courage to go into that area of the field.
The game goes in cycles...years ago the FB and TE were a thing of the past the run and shoot was here to stay. Today the TE is as prominent as I can remember. Teams still employ full backs. As defense starts going to smaller quicker guys in the middle, you'll probably see the power running games brought out to exploit the size matchup advantage.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 03:49 PM
|
#2924
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Can you?
|
No and that's my point. It obviously isn't Belichek and NE's scheme alone that makes Welker an amazing receiver otherwise the slot receiver before him would be well known and would have dominated.
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 05:31 PM
|
#2925
|
First Line Centre
|
Welker is a great reciever, people that point out that he is good only because of Brady dont know football. i guess Jerry Rice wasnt great, after all he had Montana/Young throwing him the ball?
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 07:57 PM
|
#2926
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sowa
And Welker enabled NE to do this thus revolutionizing his position. Who was the slot receiver under Belichek before Welker? Bet you can't name him without googling.
|
Wasn't your Wayne Chrebet the first prominent slot receiver? It's a pretty new position and role to compare that far back.
119 catches sure but they're all 5 yards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk diggler
Welker is a great reciever, people that point out that he is good only because of Brady dont know football. i guess Jerry Rice wasnt great, after all he had Montana/Young throwing him the ball?
|
Really!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
A lot of that is because of 3-4 defensive schemes. A guy like Welker can get away from a middle linebacker for that kind of gain, so long as he can withstand a hit, and has the courage to go into that area of the field.
The game goes in cycles...years ago the FB and TE were a thing of the past the run and shoot was here to stay. Today the TE is as prominent as I can remember. Teams still employ full backs. As defense starts going to smaller quicker guys in the middle, you'll probably see the power running games brought out to exploit the size matchup advantage.
|
Yup also because of the defenseless receiver penalty. Safeties can't take off the heads of receivers running slants anymore.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
Last edited by GirlySports; 12-27-2011 at 07:59 PM.
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 08:11 PM
|
#2927
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Brandon Stokley was one of the first prominent slot receivers.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 09:47 PM
|
#2928
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Wasn't your Wayne Chrebet the first prominent slot receiver? It's a pretty new position and role to compare that far back.
|
Don't have to compare that far back. Welker first season as a Patriot was 07 and he had 112 catches. They certainly didn't create a scheme for a guy whose career to that point had been nothing special so who was the slot guy with 100+ catches on the Pats in 06?
Quote:
119 catches sure but they're all 5 yards.
|
Averages 13 yds/catch
Quote:
Yup also because of the defenseless receiver penalty. Safeties can't take off the heads of receivers running slants anymore.
|
Welker doesn't get just linebackers and safeties. More often than not he is facing the opposing teams top corner.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamingLonghorn For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-27-2011, 11:12 PM
|
#2929
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sowa
No and that's my point. It obviously isn't Belichek and NE's scheme alone that makes Welker an amazing receiver otherwise the slot receiver before him would be well known and would have dominated.
|
Yeah that's such a flawed way of looking at it. As Sylvan said above the emergence of that type of player has to do with things like changing defensive schemes and new offensive schemes. Welker obviously fills that role very well, but let's not pretend that Wes Welker showed up one day and changed football.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
|
|
|
12-27-2011, 11:14 PM
|
#2930
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk diggler
Welker is a great reciever, people that point out that he is good only because of Brady dont know football. i guess Jerry Rice wasnt great, after all he had Montana/Young throwing him the ball?
|
Rice wouldn't have had nearly the numbers he did without great QB's, that doesn't make him less of a receiver, it simply recognizes that football is a sport that involves reliance upon others for individuals to excel.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-28-2011, 12:35 AM
|
#2931
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sowa
Don't have to compare that far back. Welker first season as a Patriot was 07 and he had 112 catches. They certainly didn't create a scheme for a guy whose career to that point had been nothing special so who was the slot guy with 100+ catches on the Pats in 06?
Averages 13 yds/catch
Welker doesn't get just linebackers and safeties. More often than not he is facing the opposing teams top corner.
|
13 yds/catch that's inflated when a couple of them go for 99 yards.
The slot receiver in 2006 would be Cadwell with 70odd catches. I'm just guessing. It served them quite well until they lost in the AFC Championship.
I don't think anyone in the NFL had 100 catches in 2006 so I think your question is moot. Teams just didn't throw the ball as much. So they did create a scheme for a guy whose career to that point had been nothing special
Obviously Welker is better than Cadwell so they went and got him. No idea why the Dolphins traded him or couldn't come up with a scheme for him.
The beginning of 2007 once Brady and Welker got a good relationship going and other defenses couldn't match up, they kept going to it. Having Randy Moss double covered also helped too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Yeah that's such a flawed way of looking at it. As Sylvan said above the emergence of that type of player has to do with things like changing defensive schemes and new offensive schemes. Welker obviously fills that role very well, but let's not pretend that Wes Welker showed up one day and changed football.
|
Exactly. In fact all football change at the same time led by coaches like Bellichick who exploited back secondaries and the lax defensive rules. Welker was/is a nice tool to have to implement such a scheme.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 08:30 AM
|
#2932
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
13 yds/catch that's inflated when a couple of them go for 99 yards.
The slot receiver in 2006 would be Cadwell with 70odd catches. I'm just guessing. It served them quite well until they lost in the AFC Championship.
I don't think anyone in the NFL had 100 catches in 2006 so I think your question is moot. Teams just didn't throw the ball as much. So they did create a scheme for a guy whose career to that point had been nothing special
Obviously Welker is better than Cadwell so they went and got him. No idea why the Dolphins traded him or couldn't come up with a scheme for him.
The beginning of 2007 once Brady and Welker got a good relationship going and other defenses couldn't match up, they kept going to it. Having Randy Moss double covered also helped too.
Exactly. In fact all football change at the same time led by coaches like Bellichick who exploited back secondaries and the lax defensive rules. Welker was/is a nice tool to have to implement such a scheme.
|
Because they are the Dolphins and they are incompetent. I hate being a fan of that team.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 09:06 AM
|
#2933
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
A Final Four of GB, NO, NE and PIT? Rodgers, Brees, Brady and Ben.
You need an elite QB (or a top defence) to be a contender.
This is why teams like CLE should keep drafting QBs until they hit the jackpot. OK QBs like Colt McCoy aren't going to get the job done.
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 09:45 AM
|
#2934
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
A Final Four of GB, NO, NE and PIT? Rodgers, Brees, Brady and Ben.
You need an elite QB (or a top defence) to be a contender.
This is why teams like CLE should keep drafting QBs until they hit the jackpot. OK QBs like Colt McCoy aren't going to get the job done.
|
Jets have been in the final four the last 2 years. Defense and a running game mean a lot more in the playoffs. Ravens could make some noise as well.
I am not saying the Jets will make some noise, I don't actually think they get in and hopefully Schottenheimer is gone.
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 09:57 AM
|
#2935
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Is Von Miller still a shoe in for Defensive ROY, or does Aldon Smith get consideration since he has 14 sacks, one away from the rookie sack record?
Miller is an every down back while Smith has generally only come in on passing downs (although he has been getting more snaps as the season progresses).
After week 8 I would have said it looked like Miller winning was a sure thing but I'm not so sure anymore.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 09:59 AM
|
#2936
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
Is Von Miller still a shoe in for Defensive ROY, or does Aldon Smith get consideration since he has 14 sacks, one away from the rookie sack record?
Miller is an every down back while Smith has generally only come in on passing downs (although he has been getting more snaps as the season progresses).
After week 8 I would have said it looked like Miller winning was a sure thing but I'm not so sure anymore.
|
I think it's still Miller, like you said Miller is playing every down so he has 20-30 more tackles and has an impact on every down...
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 10:45 AM
|
#2937
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
If Smith breaks Kearse's record he'll win it.
Miller's thumb injury has really slowed him down the last couple of weeks.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 12:36 PM
|
#2938
|
Retired
|
Welker has great hands, amazing route running ability and can get open.
Might not be the biggest, fastest or strongest guy, but he does what he does very, very well. It works for the Pats.
|
|
|
12-28-2011, 01:00 PM
|
#2939
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KTown
Correction Brady is never out of the game. I honestly think with the team in front of Brady this year that the Pats would be just about as bad as the colts are without Manning.
|
Eight Patriots, 49ers lead Pro Bowl rosters
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...?sct=nfl_t2_a8
Brady is one of seven starters from New England (12-3). The others are receiver Wes Welker, tight end Rob Gronkowski, defensive tackle Vince Wilfork, defensive end Andre Carter, and guards Brian Waters and Logan Mankins all are starters for the AFC from the Patriots. Special teamer Matthew Slater is the other New England representative.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-28-2011, 02:27 PM
|
#2940
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
How do the Patriots have more defensive pro-bowlers than the Steelers!?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.
|
|