Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-23-2026, 07:44 PM   #29021
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Katy Perry: 'I'm having Justin Trudeau's baby'
lol. All those men with all of those bumper stickers must just be so confused right now.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2026, 08:24 PM   #29022
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
2 things.

One is that I’m not that interested in having a debate about it. I’m really not. Nobody is interested in changing their mind.
Why wouldn’t they? This isn’t the fervent left and environmental warriors who see the rise in production as the problem, these would be people who see a significant rise in production and think ‘isn’t that a good thing?’

Quote:
Two is that it is not the right framing. As if exporting the most oil ever is the right way to think about it, it isn’t. It doesn’t take into account consideration about a million things and lacks so much context and is so disingenuous it’s kinda tough to even know where to start.
The start is easy: ‘heres just one or two of a million reasons why a 50% increase in production isn’t as good as it seems.’

Quote:
Yes, everyone in oil and gas are whiny. And all they do is whine and they have no point to their whining and they have nothing to complain about and the country has done an amazing job for the industry to make sure it is all working really smoothly and competitively. Got it. You guys win the debate thing, now let’s continue to watch the Canadian economy slide.
‘Hey auto workers, I know you’ve seen production fall by 50% over the past decade, but wait until you hear what the oil and gas industry has been through!’

Canadians are generally in favour of resource development. But they have their own problems so the ‘our growth and unprecedented levels of production isn’t good and we won’t elaborate further and why are you being so unfair to us, do you even care?!’ shtick probably isn't the way to win hearts and minds. Again, these are people generally in favour of oil and gas production, not against it. Why should what appears to be a thriving industry (because what is the measure of an industry if not their production) be more at the front of their mind ahead of other sectors of the economy?
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2026, 08:32 PM   #29023
Puppet Guy
Franchise Player
 
Puppet Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
lol. All those men with all of those bumper stickers must just be so confused right now.

Or jealous.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"

- Surferguy
Puppet Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2026, 12:23 AM   #29024
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
Why wouldn’t they? This isn’t the fervent left and environmental warriors who see the rise in production as the problem, these would be people who see a significant rise in production and think ‘isn’t that a good thing?’
#-3's response is typically the one that occurs in these types of discussions and what we generally find in this forum. If such people were reasonable in discussing, the question asking to debate it wouldn't be happening as they would get informed themselves. Generally, they are already of a narrative mindset born out of years of deliberate misinformation and biased agendas.

Case exhibit A

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
Finally a Trudeau and Notely supporter who appreciated the infrastructure they built.
This narrative of course omits that Notley herself called Trudeau completely tone deaf on oil and gas and Alberta issues.


There is far more to the oil industry than just production. Production stayed relatively steady in 2020 even while oil prices were negative yet people at the time weren't gaslighting that oil and gas was doing great. As it happens, you can't just shut off production on a dime, and a shut down could takes months to a year to get back to normal (hence negative prices and the massive fleet of oil tankers sitting around waiting for the world to reopen). This is why despite being at negative, Canada still produced 17.41 millions of cubic meters in May 2020, only 20% lower than the 'all time peak' months of 2024 being vaunted


Heck, the claim that oil has climbed continuously to all time highs is somewhat bogus to begin with, it has stayed relatively flat in recent years fluctuating based on seasonality and isolated incidents (forest fires shutting down production, upgrader maintenance etc).

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/dail...g-f004-eng.htm


January 2020 21.58

September 2024 21.15

Quote:
Oil sands extraction fell 2.5% year over year to 15.3 million cubic metres in September 2024. The decline was driven by lower production of crude bitumen (-9.5%), while production of synthetic crude rose 11.7% year over year despite some turnaround activities underway at two upgraders.

Conventional oil extraction was up 9.1% to 5.9 million cubic metres in September, offsetting the decline in oil sands extraction. The gain was largely driven by the production of light and medium crude oil in Newfoundland and Labrador, which rose 92.4% year over year because of maintenance, reducing production in September 2023.
And notably, one major factor that has changed in 2024 to influence production is the opening of the TMX expansion which has completely opened up asian markets to Canadian oil exports, and giving a huge boost to WCS not requiring such a significant discount anymore with new markets opened. Oil companies are definitely in a better spot with the opening of TMX (hence offering strong validation that pipelines are in fact needed).


https://www.asiapacific.ca/publicati...sia-and-beyond




Effectively, if your profit margins drop by over half, and you need to double production to make up the margin loss, are you ahead just because you are producing more? Most reasonable folks would say no. That's where oil prices, WCS discount, carbon taxes all factor in to why oil and gas companies still need to produce, and produce more.

This is why Notley bought rail cars to move product to help oil companies stay solvent in a pricing crisis in 2018 caused by lack of pipeline capacity. Yet 2018 was an all time high in production at the time.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/not...deau-1.4923976

Quote:
Western Canadian Select, which includes product from the oilsands, trades at just $11.56 US — less than a quarter of the $51.49 that West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the U.S. gold standard, fetches on the open market. (These prices were current as of Wednesday.)

"Coca-Cola sells sugar-flavoured water for more. We are essentially giving our oil away for free," Notley said.

I could write an essay on it, but I've already done several on different aspects.

If what I provided helped yourself though in understanding why some people are at odds with the production metric, hopefully the effort was worth the time to write and read.

Last edited by Firebot; 01-24-2026 at 12:35 AM.
Firebot is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Firebot For This Useful Post:
Old 01-24-2026, 12:34 AM   #29025
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Katy Perry: 'I'm having Justin Trudeau's baby'
Wouldn't that be a severe geriatric pregnancy?
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2026, 09:42 AM   #29026
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
And notably, one major factor that has changed in 2024 to influence production is the opening of the TMX expansion which has completely opened up asian markets to Canadian oil exports, and giving a huge boost to WCS not requiring such a significant discount anymore with new markets opened. Oil companies are definitely in a better spot with the opening of TMX (hence offering strong validation that pipelines are in fact needed).
I was interested in seeing if I could find some crude formula that for every MMBPD of west coast export the differential narrows by so much, so we could see the value of additional pipelines, but alas, that would be too simple.

TMX hasn't been operating long enough or through enough types of market conditions that you can find a pattern to extract. The differential has declined, but not enough data to figure out the amount caused by TMX. What I did find was commentary saying it's provided more stability in the differential, which is a good thing for predictability. And that is something you can see in the chart.



https://www.aer.ca/data-and-performa...anadian-select


Quote:
Effectively, if your profit margins drop by over half, and you need to double production to make up the margin loss, are you ahead just because you are producing more? Most reasonable folks would say no. That's where oil prices, WCS discount, carbon taxes all factor in to why oil and gas companies still need to produce, and produce more.
The alternative is just less profit, otherwise you could argue when times are good they could double production and double profit, right? They don't HAVE to do anything other than rake in less money. At $2 billion a quarter(Suncor), there is room for that(and one of my primary arguments we don't get enough income from the industry given the costs they are downloading on taxpayers). But my point is your argument is they must do these things to survive the tyranny of regulations and competing interests restricting their production, but they don't. They won't die. They choose to produce more to make more profit and when export capacity exists, not only because they must for survival.
Fuzz is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy