Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Yes, if you reduce the gap between the slowest moving vehicles and the fastest ones by raising the floor, the average speed will go up. That's just a product of recalculating an average when you take out the lowest numbers from the data.
Again, this conclusion does not automatically follow. In a vacuum, sure, you can say higher speed presents with higher risk, but we're talking about real-world situations, and what matters is variance, not the absolute number on the speedometer. Collisions are far more likely when there's a wide gap between the fastest and slowest vehicles. If higher limits bring everyone's speeds closer together, you actually reduce that risk. We're not talking about cranking the speed limit to match the black Ram driver.
The data consistently shows that when limits are properly aligned with how people already drive, crash rates stay the same or even decline. It's when you have slow drivers acting as moving chicanes and impatient drivers weaving around them that things get messy.
A broken clock is correct twice a day, this is one of those times. [shrug]
|
Variance is a factor but higher speeds are higher risk, that fact is irrefutable. Longer stopping distances, less time for reaction and higher collision forces all increase the outcomes of collisions. Is it material at 110 vs 120 vs 130? That needs be determined and based on evidence not some online survey from these idiots.
The data also shows that the speed limit has to align with the road design, traffic volume and makeup, so saying just raise it even further because that’s what people do doesn’t really make it justifiable.