Calgarypuck Mafia Game Thread

[GGG]

What you see in the above posts is clear planning throughout the day to build a case against one of the new players whichever one fits their case.

[agulati]

Originally Posted by GGG

What you see in the above posts is clear planning throughout the day to build a case against one of the new players whichever one fits their case.

I have clearly stated that I don't hold someone being new as a reason to vote for them.

I have also clearly stated which of these previously mentioned new players I believe are town in many previous posts. I have also previously stated that bonded struck me as an anomaly compared to others. Him posting all of a sudden trying to fit the newbie bill struck me as odd. It is still day 1 in the game and it is a crapshoot at this point. Given on all the information we have, I voted for him.

[dissentowner]

Originally Posted by GGG

What you see in the above posts is clear planning throughout the day to build a case against one of the new players whichever one fits their case.

No, what you saw above was me going through all the pages of posts and noticing what fit.

[agulati]

I have always held that voting or piling on without merit is something I find suspicious. Bonded piled on his vote for me, without explaining his reasoning. WinnipegFan was a revenge vote so that explained his vote. Mrkajz had an explanation as to why he voted for me, which I obviously don't agree with, but it still is reasoning.

I also mentioned that I see no reasoning for SebC throwing a vote out, but I am letting him pitch in with his reasoning.

[Bonded]

Too many posts to qoute on mobile but I also bought into the active is good like scorn. I mentioned my newness because GGG asked. I figured if I avoided answering I would also look suspicious and have ulterior motives and plans.



I changed my vote because MrKajz had good logic that the scrum would want to get a 5 person vote and that a scum would have snuck a vote in. Up to this point diss hadn't said much besides responding to getting voted on and agulati had more theory and that merited a vote.



As for the hammer comment, everyone wants 5 person vote but if we get 8 it sounds like that person is gone right away and night started.

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by Bonded

Too many posts to qoute on mobile but I also bought into the active is good like scorn. I mentioned my newness because GGG asked. I figured if I avoided answering I would also look suspicious and have ulterior motives and plans.



I changed my vote because MrKajz had good logic that the scrum would want to get a 5 person vote and that a scum would have snuck a vote in. Up to this point diss hadn't said much besides responding to getting voted on and agulati had more theory and that merited a vote.



As for the hammer comment, everyone wants 5 person vote but if we get 8 it sounds like that person is gone right away and night started.

What is "scrum" and "scum"?

[Scornfire]

he miss typed, supposed to both read "scum" I'm sure, ie. Oiler Trolls. They're using old terminology

[Bonded]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

What is "scrum" and "scum"?

Oilers fans. Meant scum for both. I have seen it a few posts and quicker to write than oilers fan.

[GGG]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

What is "scrum" and "scum"?

Scornfire is correct, scum for both which is mafia or oilers. I’m trying to use trolls and oilers but I keep slipping back into generic mafia speak.

[Fuzz]

Mmmkay...Bonded, well you just hit my spidey senses.



1)You say you are new to the game, yet you throw around old terminology.



2)You were the first to throw out the Con Smyth clue, where a newb would not be that quick to realize it would ID you as a Flames Fan.


3)You were the first to throw a random number generator which I wouldn't have thought of, but then you didn't vote by it, so Idunno.


4)You asked "What is general etiquette, vote for people who don't post or let them get replaced?" When the discussion wasn't going that way, and looks like a question someone who had played on another forum would ask, given that it's a question about etiquette HERE. It's not something I would have asked, knowing nothing about the game, reading the rules and not showing up a day late and being worried about my posting status. Maybe nothing, but suspicious.


5)Much later you admit to being a newb. This seems odd.


I suspect you have played elsewhere, and know what you are doing. Your post history looks really suspicious, reading through them all back to back:


https://forum.calgarypuck.com/search...archid=9612850


Anyway, all we have to go on is what people post before the end of tomorrow, and for now you have me switching my vote.

[Fuzz]

Remove vote:mrkajz44

[Fuzz]

vote: Bonded

[GGG]

Originally Posted by dissentowner

No, what you saw above was me going through all the pages of posts and noticing what fit.

Based on an entirely invented assumption that their must be trolls in the new posters. You are seeing exactly what you want to see here. The only question is are you doing on purpose or an unwitting participant with agulati.

[dissentowner]

Originally Posted by GGG

Based on an entirely invented assumption that their must be trolls in the new posters. You are seeing exactly what you want to see here. The only question is are you doing on purpose or an unwitting participant with agulati.

It was not based on that at all. It was my speculation based on his posts and how they were made. There was only one post about the hammer that had to do with being a new poster. I think you might need to re-read what I wrote. I am not seeing what I want to see, I gave sound reasoning why I think Bonded could well be an Oilers fan. Your refute to that is to say I am focusing on Bonded because he is new and I gave the possibility a new player could be an Oilers fan while ignoring everything else? Ok. We have a little over 24 hrs to figure out a lynch and so I did the research to see what looked off to me. That last line you wrote is very interesting. Why is that the only question? I look back at your posts and while I am not sure what to make of your play so far you sure are muddying the waters a lot every time you post.

[GGG]

When I say You are seeing what you want to see what I mean is that I think you could make just as good of case for Scorn as you could for Bonded right now. The more I read the sequence though it’s Agulati that’s the suspicious one here. He is sitting at 3 votes and jumps on your post to keep himself alive.

[Bonded]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

Mmmkay...Bonded, well you just hit my spidey senses.



1)You say you are new to the game, yet you throw around old terminology.



2)You were the first to throw out the Con Smyth clue, where a newb would not be that quick to realize it would ID you as a Flames Fan.


3)You were the first to throw a random number generator which I wouldn't have thought of, but then you didn't vote by it, so Idunno.


4)You asked "What is general etiquette, vote for people who don't post or let them get replaced?" When the discussion wasn't going that way, and looks like a question someone who had played on another forum would ask, given that it's a question about etiquette HERE. It's not something I would have asked, knowing nothing about the game, reading the rules and not showing up a day late and being worried about my posting status. Maybe nothing, but suspicious.


5)Much later you admit to being a newb. This seems odd.


I suspect you have played elsewhere, and know what you are doing. Your post history looks really suspicious, reading through them all back to back:


https://forum.calgarypuck.com/search...archid=9612850


Anyway, all we have to go on is what people post before the end of tomorrow, and for now you have me switching my vote.

Most of that was to figure out my first vote. in retrospect I should have waited to vote altogether. Sending out bad juju. I actually thought that the PMs might have had a clue and would help us snuff people out and I was worried a random vote wouldn't go down well and I would be voted on.


As for the etiquette question, if people could get subbed in and be involved, it seemed better to vote for someone posting than voting for a non poster.

[GGG]

Unvote: Puxlut

[GGG]

Vote Agulati

[GGG]

That’s 4 on Agulati and 3 on Bonded if we hit 7 we Ban him immediately so be careful at this point to count votes when you add or delete from them.

[bizaro86]

Originally Posted by GGG

That’s 4 on Agulati and 3 on Bonded if we hit 7 we Ban him immediately so be careful at this point to count votes when you add or delete from them.

You missed the 4 votes on scornfire here.

Mistake?