Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which goaltender do you hope will be starting for the Flames in the 2017–18 Season?
Jonathan Bernier (UFA) 11 1.76%
Mike Condon (UFA) 5 0.80%
Brian Elliott (UFA) 51 8.16%
Marc Andre-Fleury (Trade) 219 35.04%
Jon Gillies 33 5.28%
Philipp Grubauer (Trade) 73 11.68%
Jaroslav Halak (Trade) 10 1.60%
Chad Johnson (UFA) 3 0.48%
Joonis Korpisalo (Trade) 25 4.00%
Steve Mason (UFA) 14 2.24%
Ryan Miller (UFA) 22 3.52%
Peter Mrazek (Trade) 19 3.04%
Micheal Neuvirth (Trade) 0 0%
Calvin Pickard (Trade) 18 2.88%
Antti Raanta (Trade) 78 12.48%
David Rittich 4 0.64%
Mike Smith (Trade) 35 5.60%
Cam Ward (Trade) 5 0.80%
Voters: 625. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2017, 04:00 PM   #261
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Smith hasn't had above average stats since 2012.

Mind you it's hard to backstop a struggling non playoff team that does not do enough to win games, but you wouldn't be bringing in a guy that isn't comfortable with losing frequently..
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 04:06 PM   #262
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
Smith hasn't had above average stats since 2012.

Mind you it's hard to backstop a struggling non playoff team that does not do enough to win games, but you wouldn't be bringing in a guy that isn't comfortable with losing frequently..
Just because he hasn't requested a trade, doesn't mean he's comfortable with losing frequently.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 04:18 PM   #263
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOnlyBilko View Post
If we don't get Marc Andre Fleury I consider our goalie situation a failure. Please get Fleury, if he will even come here. We should have got Fleury last summer instead of Elliott ugghhh
Ya, we totally should have given up our future high skilled power forward for a goalie. Good call.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 05-14-2017, 05:10 PM   #264
Rutuu
First Line Centre
 
Rutuu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Any chance of getting Robin Lehner's name added to the list? He's an RFA in Buffalo and is 25yrs old.
Rutuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 05:48 PM   #265
LIP MAN
Powerplay Quarterback
 
LIP MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

My head says go for a veteran like MAF. My heart says Gillies will be there by the end of the year.

Would love to be in a situation like Nashville where we have to choose between two stellar goalies.
LIP MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 06:20 PM   #266
David Struch
First Line Centre
 
David Struch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I believe the Knights can select up to seven goaltenders.

Here are 12 possible scenarios.
http://thehockeywriters.com/getting-...-some-goalies/
David Struch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 06:34 PM   #267
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Struch View Post
I believe the Knights can select up to seven goaltenders.
Yes, they must select 14 forwards, 9 defencemen, and 3 goalies (total of 26). The other 4 picks can be from any position. That means they could pick 7 goalies if they wanted to.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 05-14-2017, 07:18 PM   #268
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
If we could get Schneider that would be amazing. I wonder what package would get a deal done?:

Gillies + 16th overall + Alex Chiasson

Would that be enough? Do we want to trade our only top 100 pick in this years draft?

This allows Parsons to develop in the AHL for a few years while we go for it with Schneider.
It's hard to say what the market is for goalies. I'm always way off. But, FWIW, personally, I would go as high as something like the following:

16th OA
3rd rounder we save for not re-signing Elliott
Choice of Parsons/Gillies
Choice of any prospect (Andersson, Klingyton, Jankowski etc.)

Overpayment? Ya, and Jankowski would be a painful give and I would prefer not to, but I'm desperate for an elite, clear cut, number 1 goalie.
Clever_Iggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 07:27 PM   #269
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Is there any traction to these Schneider and Rask rumours or is it more just wishful thinking? I'd be all over either but I haven't heard their names out there outside of here.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 08:11 PM   #270
shotinthebacklund
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
It's hard to say what the market is for goalies. I'm always way off. But, FWIW, personally, I would go as high as something like the following:

16th OA
3rd rounder we save for not re-signing Elliott
Choice of Parsons/Gillies
Choice of any prospect (Andersson, Klingyton, Jankowski etc.)

Overpayment? Ya, and Jankowski would be a painful give and I would prefer not to, but I'm desperate for an elite, clear cut, number 1 goalie.
That give could be enough to cripple this organization for years. No way flames offer such a package
shotinthebacklund is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to shotinthebacklund For This Useful Post:
Old 05-14-2017, 08:47 PM   #271
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

1. Miller
2a. Johnson
2b. Gillies.
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 09:32 PM   #272
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Stat watching is difficult on goalies, so it becomes almost irrelevant comparing a goalie's SV% over the last few years.

For instance - Raanta does indeed have better stats than Johnson over the last 3 or 4 seasons, but what kind of a team was in front of him? How many golden opportunities and second/third chances was Johnson required to make vs Raanta?

You need a lot more stats to backup any story you would like me to believe about your favorite goalie vs my favorite goalie. SV% as a stat is nice to know, but doesn't really tell me much.

Not that I am saying that Johnson is better than Raanta (I think I voted Raanta in this poll, actually). I am just saying that simply going by one or two metrics isn't doing much in the way of convincing me one goalie is vastly superior to another. I like the fact that Johnson had a .920 in front of a terrible Buffalo team, and that he did do a great job in carrying the Flames for a while. Has Raanta done so in his time with Chicago or New York? (I don't know).

I just find that there is a whole lot of 'noise' about goalies in this thread, but not much in any thorough analysis of a particular favorite. Why does someone like a particular goalie so much? What do they see in him that makes a person feel he would be a good choice for Calgary? That's what I am hoping to learn from this thread.

For me, the most important aspect for a goalie is to just be consistent. Make the saves you are supposed to make. Make an occasional highlight reel save when the game is on the line? Great! But I will give those up every time for no bad goals. That is all I am hoping for in net for now. Just some consistently decent goaltending ala Fred Brathwaite. I am hoping for the next Miika, but I will take the next Fred for now.

Flames don't need a goalie to steal games like Talbot does for Edmonton. They just need a goalie not to lose games for them. That is all I am asking for with regards to that position. Just some consistently average goaltending. Dependable. I have no idea who can provide that any longer.

Hope the Flames get 5 goalies. Screw up 2 games in a row, you get thrown on waivers. Go through them all. That is how confident I feel on the available options. (and no, I don't expect the Flames to get 5 goalies - just illustrating my point in how little confidence I have in any goalies at the moment).
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 05-14-2017, 09:33 PM   #273
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
It's hard to say what the market is for goalies. I'm always way off. But, FWIW, personally, I would go as high as something like the following:

16th OA
3rd rounder we save for not re-signing Elliott
Choice of Parsons/Gillies
Choice of any prospect (Andersson, Klingyton, Jankowski etc.)

Overpayment? Ya, and Jankowski would be a painful give and I would prefer not to, but I'm desperate for an elite, clear cut, number 1 goalie.
Schneider was acquired for the 9th overall which turned out to be Horvat.

Since that trade, Schneider has gotten 3 years older and his playoff win total has not changed, and he had a bad year last year.

I think the 16OA and Mason McDonald and maybe a 3rd round pick should be the max Treliving offers.

Schneider is really unproven in the playoffs.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:40 PM   #274
TheOnlyBilko
Scoring Winger
 
TheOnlyBilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Hahahahaha no he is not.
That should be "ya, he was NOT. He's a top 3 LW"
TheOnlyBilko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:41 PM   #275
TheOnlyBilko
Scoring Winger
 
TheOnlyBilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
Fleury will struggle here just like Elliott did.


If u say so
TheOnlyBilko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:44 PM   #276
TheOnlyBilko
Scoring Winger
 
TheOnlyBilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Ya, we totally should have given up our future high skilled power forward for a goalie. Good call.


Did I say we should have given up #6? I said we should have got him last summer. Not to mention NOBODY thought Tkachuk would last that long.NOT to mention if we got MAF we don't how the season would have went. We already know what we got with Elliott
TheOnlyBilko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:46 PM   #277
TheOnlyBilko
Scoring Winger
 
TheOnlyBilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Calgary via Palm Desert
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
Top 10 sure, but not top 3.
name 9 better LWers?
TheOnlyBilko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:55 PM   #278
Love
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

I definitely take Gaudreau and Benn over Hall. I have him in the same tier as Forsberg and Marchand so he's the 5th best LW at worst imo. I take Hall clearly over Panarin, Ehlers, Patio-ready, Hoffman and Ovechkin.
Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2017, 11:58 PM   #279
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOnlyBilko View Post
name 9 better LWers?
Definitely better:
Ovechkin
Benn
Marchand
Panarin
Gaudreau
Forsberg

Debatable:
Saad
Zetterberg
Marleau
Pacioretty
Hoffman
Steen
Landeskog
(Maybe more?)

Hall is, at best, in the 5-10 range for LW.
It's not hard to argue that he doesn't even belong in the top ten, period.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 05-14-2017, 11:59 PM   #280
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Love View Post
I definitely take Gaudreau and Benn over Hall. I have him in the same tier as Forsberg and Marchand so he's the 5th best LW at worst imo. I take Hall clearly over Panarin, Ehlers, Patio-ready, Hoffman and Ovechkin.
Hall is better than Ovechkin in pre-trade Oiler fantasyland.

But that's about it.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy