[GT] Carolina @ Calgary

[Righteous1]

Heil Ramo!

[Yamer]

Nice save, Ramo. Good to see the guys go back and give him a big thank-you.

[KootenayFlamesFan]

Big save. Hope the boys can build off of it and score soon.

[Yoho]

Save

[PeteMoss]

Ramooooooooooooooooooooooo

[krynski]

thank you ramo.

[Machiavelli]

Skinner definitely got the shot off, should not have been a PS.

[H2SO4(aq)]

Originally Posted by Mike F

BS call - he still got a scoring chance. Should be 2 min minor

Clear break away, hooking. It's a 4'' putt of a call.

[JurassicTunga12]

big save

[PeteMoss]

Originally Posted by dino7c

still a terrible goal

Can't ask goalies to get shutouts in order to win.

[Jakester]

Ramo!

[Cortez]

someone show me a paycheck so I can quit my job right now

[Yamer]

I think it's called any time a scoring chance has been diminished in any way. According to NHL.com:

Rule 24 - Penalty Shot
24.1 Penalty Shot – A penalty shot is designed to restore a scoring opportunity which was lost as a result of a foul being committed by the offending team, based on the parameters set out in these rules.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by PeteMoss

Can't ask goalies to get shutouts in order to win.

never did, I said neither guy would be the starter for long

[krynski]

Originally Posted by Cortez

someone show me a paycheck so I can quite my job right now

??????

Something on tv?

[Yamer]

Good thing Ramo didn't trim his toe nails before the game.

[combustiblefuel]

Originally Posted by dino7c

never did, I said neither guy would be the starter for long

Christ, they've played what ? 14 games a peice?

[dino7c]

sticks not cracked that is the scratch on your retina

[Cortez]

Originally Posted by krynski

??????

Something on tv?

preview for the wolf of wall street

[Mike F]

Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)

Clear break away, hooking. It's a 4'' putt of a call.

Here's the criteria:

There are four (4) specific conditions that must be met in order for the Referee to award a penalty shot for a player being fouled from behind. They are:
(i) The infraction must have taken place in the neutral zone or attacking zone, (i.e. over the puck carrier’s own blue line);
(ii) The infraction must have been committed from behind;
(iii) The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score (the fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a “more” reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded);
(iv) The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have had no opposing player between himself and the goalkeeper.

So no, it's not as simple as hook on a breakaway=penalty shot.

I though he regained control and got off a full shot; i.e. a reasonable chance to score