Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2025, 04:23 PM   #27821
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
The US is, and will always be, our best option. Diversifying trade is good, but I don't think many Canadians know what that will actually entail, so instead, it just feels good to say.
The US will always be our largest trading partner, almost without question. That doesn't necessarily mean they're our best option for things though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
He’s right though. Partisanship rules the day these days.

For example, we need a pipeline to the BC coast. Smiths trying to get that done, but you hate her guts so presumably you’re against it. Correct me if I’m wrong. Can’t see you supporting her on that, but it’s absolutely needed if we’re serious about deleveraging from the USA.

The idea hadn’t been floated for 5 mins and didn’t even have details (because the point was to announce the work is going to be done to get the details), and you have the BC premier instantly saying no deal (to what deal? Why say no? Bizarre approach).

This isn’t a country, and we aren’t serious about working together as one.
I always like your posts and thoughts, but that last line drives me insane. I hate that line of thinking. As a province, Alberta wants these pipelines and other provinces don't...so the only way we're serious as a country is if Alberta gets our way? Gimme a break.

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
People who don't think there aren't at least a dozen business plans sitting ready to go for a BC pipeline don't know anything. Why would a proponent come out at this stage and announce plans? That's the definition of shooting oneself in the foot. The regulatory and political environment is too tense right now for anyone but the federal government to lead the way.
I don't think that there are a bunch of pipelines ready to roll. I think that with the last decade of consultation requirements, moving targets in terms of the environmental and regulatory requirements, and things of that nature, companies are not as excited to consider these as you might say. To get these applications all ready and get to that kind of point it's an investment of what...$100-$200m? So you spend that kind of money and find out that the project is rejected and not getting off the drawing board. It's not surprising that shareholders are less than keen to have companies they own burning their money on that kind of thing.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 04:29 PM   #27822
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I always like your posts and thoughts, but that last line drives me insane. I hate that line of thinking. As a province, Alberta wants these pipelines and other provinces don't...so the only way we're serious as a country is if Alberta gets our way? Gimme a break.
I like your post for the most part, but I'm going to disagree with you on this one.

Yes, Alberta wants to 'get it's way' but also...being able to efficiently move resources from one are to another within our country is essential.

Ontario pays a fortune in utilities, what happens when you open the taps to Alberta resources?

We get lower prices for our resources due to shipping costs, get them to tidewater, the Feds get more Royalty revenue and distribute it among the Provinces.

So yeah, 'Alberta gets its way' but it is in the best interest of the Country as a whole, and if individual parties stand in the way of that then they are inherently hindering Canada's ability to operate as an entity with the design of the benefit for all.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 04:36 PM   #27823
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
I like your post for the most part, but I'm going to disagree with you on this one.

Yes, Alberta wants to 'get it's way' but also...being able to efficiently move resources from one are to another within our country is essential.

Ontario pays a fortune in utilities, what happens when you open the taps to Alberta resources?

We get lower prices for our resources due to shipping costs, get them to tidewater, the Feds get more Royalty revenue and distribute it among the Provinces.

So yeah, 'Alberta gets its way' but it is in the best interest of the Country as a whole, and if individual parties stand in the way of that then they are inherently hindering Canada's ability to operate as an entity with the design of the benefit for all.
Right, we all know that we're right here, so if everyone would just agree with that, everything is cool. I'm not sure how that argument will go over with the other provinces, but I could take an educated guess!
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 04:46 PM   #27824
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
LNG pipelines are going to run into the same problems as a heavy crude line. The problem is, the feds haven't shown themselves willing to show up and solve any of them.

Edit: It's not even pipelines, but rail, warehouses, port infrastructure, roads. The Lower Mainland has some of the worst land use planning in the world and is running out of industrial land. Meanwhile, hundreds of acres surrounding and in the city of Richmond now has unclear title. We can't build anything anymore.
The only problem that LNG pipelines have right now is interference from Danielle Smith.

There are 2 real LNG pipeline projects moving ahead (unlike Alberta's pretend project) and Smith is interfering with stakeholders and threatening viable projects.

Alberta interferes with BC projects and then wonders why BC doesn't get excited about Alberta concepts of a project. The problem isn't BC.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 04:46 PM   #27825
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
CBC is reporting that the MP has been booted from the CPC caucus.
Guess he is sick of PP's $hit
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 04:53 PM   #27826
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
The only problem that LNG pipelines have right now is interference from Danielle Smith.

There are 2 real LNG pipeline projects moving ahead (unlike Alberta's pretend project) and Smith is interfering with stakeholders and threatening viable projects.

Alberta interferes with BC projects and then wonders why BC doesn't get excited about Alberta concepts of a project. The problem isn't BC.
Which 2 pipelines are you referring to?
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 04:54 PM   #27827
peter12
Self Imposed Retirement
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Yeah it’s news to me that Smith is trying to block LNG projects.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:00 PM   #27828
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
Yeah it’s news to me that Smith is trying to block LNG projects.
Go listen to the Premier of BC for a minute. I have linked the video on this forum.

Note: I did not say blocked. She is interfering by calling up the stakeholders of the LNG projects and saying she is going to ram an Alberta pipeline through their land too. It makes them question wanting to move ahead with the LNG pipeline if it is going to open them up to more pipelines that they haven't agreed to.

DS needs to learn how to sit down and shut up and work with others instead of attacking them. She is a part of the problem, not the solution.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:01 PM   #27829
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Go listen to the Premier of BC for a minute. I have linked the video on this forum.

Note: I did not say blocked. She is interfering by calling up the stakeholders of the LNG projects and saying she is going to ram an Alberta pipeline through their land too. It makes them question wanting to move ahead with the LNG pipeline if it is going to open them up to more pipelines that they haven't agreed to.

DS needs to learn how to sit down and shut up and work with others instead of attacking them. She is a part of the problem, not the solution.
Can you elaborate on your “2 LNG pipeline” claim?
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:02 PM   #27830
peter12
Self Imposed Retirement
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Go listen to the Premier of BC for a minute. I have linked the video on this forum.

Note: I did not say blocked. She is interfering by calling up the stakeholders of the LNG projects and saying she is going to ram an Alberta pipeline through their land too. It makes them question wanting to move ahead with the LNG pipeline if it is going to open them up to more pipelines that they haven't agreed to.

DS needs to learn how to sit down and shut up and work with others instead of attacking them. She is a part of the problem, not the solution.
Um.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:07 PM   #27831
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother View Post
Guess he is sick of PP's $hit
I don't think he'll be the only one. Carney is showing that he's governing far more like a classic conservative than a classic liberal, so for any of the cons that are sick of PP's push to Trump-style politics it's probably a tempting move
Hemi-Cuda is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:13 PM   #27832
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Can you elaborate on your “2 LNG pipeline” claim?
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:24 PM   #27833
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
The US will always be our largest trading partner, almost without question. That doesn't necessarily mean they're our best option for things though.



I always like your posts and thoughts, but that last line drives me insane. I hate that line of thinking. As a province, Alberta wants these pipelines and other provinces don't...so the only way we're serious as a country is if Alberta gets our way? Gimme a break.



I don't think that there are a bunch of pipelines ready to roll. I think that with the last decade of consultation requirements, moving targets in terms of the environmental and regulatory requirements, and things of that nature, companies are not as excited to consider these as you might say. To get these applications all ready and get to that kind of point it's an investment of what...$100-$200m? So you spend that kind of money and find out that the project is rejected and not getting off the drawing board. It's not surprising that shareholders are less than keen to have companies they own burning their money on that kind of thing.
Alberta gets its way, or Canada gets its way?

You should noodle on that.

I only bring up pipelines because it’s our biggest bargaining chip with the largest value in trade deficit with the USA (ie it’s our biggest hammer to negotiate on trade).

There doesn’t appear to be much changing in Canada with provinces suddenly dealing with each other a whole bunch. Some small stuff, but nothing meaningful from what I can tell so ya, Canada is not really operating like a country from what I can tell? Let me know what you’re seeing out there though. Like what’s changed really?

Last edited by Mr.Coffee; 11-04-2025 at 05:36 PM.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:31 PM   #27834
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
The clip doesn't mention anything about two LNG pipelines.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calgarygeologist For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2025, 05:38 PM   #27835
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/i...g/lng-projects

looks like there are 3 proposed projects
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:43 PM   #27836
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

okay expanding it it looks like there are 2 pipelines and one marine facility. So the pipelines look like they are the Kitimat and Woodfibre LNG. Looking at the site, both have had their environmental certificates given. so I am guessing they are at the stakeholder engagement part. That is probably why BC is not wanting DS to rock the boat.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 05:56 PM   #27837
peter12
Self Imposed Retirement
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

You can’t get a permit without a ton of stakeholder engagement.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 06:12 PM   #27838
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12 View Post
You can’t get a permit without a ton of stakeholder engagement.
So that is probably precisely the issue. You have these projects in front of the stakeholders trying to get things sorted. Danielle Smith is doing her best Leroy Jenkins running in bringing up hypothetical pipelines that she wants to commission a study or report on.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 06:17 PM   #27839
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/i...g/lng-projects

looks like there are 3 proposed projects
Yah those are LNG facilities.

I’m guessing Wolven was just making things up as usual.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2025, 06:23 PM   #27840
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

This should be great news for everyone on CP and something we can come together and celebrate but this new budget and Carney government is eliminating the luxury tax. Everyone is welcome for champagne on my yatch.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy