Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2015, 05:59 PM   #2721
kermitology
It's not easy being green!
 
kermitology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llwhiteoutll View Post
Target shooting, competition, hunting, collecting, self defense (legal in Canada and the US).

As already pointed out, assault rifles are already classed as prohibited in Canada and near impossible to get in the US.

All activities which are destructive in one way or another, the violent death of an animal or the violent destruction of a target.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
kermitology is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 06:12 PM   #2722
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnie View Post
They don't actually have the right, within the constructs of the original amendment. At least, according to this guy, anyway.
It's irrelevant though in a country where most people support giving every body a gun that wants one, all of the legal and practical pros and cons are pointless really as long as Americans are okay with 30,000 dead a year.

Again I find it ironic in a country that in all other respects is obsessed with safety, a few body bags come back from Iraq and support for a war disappears completely.

Less people died in 9/11 than were killed by guns in the same month in 2001 and yet the difference in response is nothing short of staggering, several trillion dollars spent, a fully mobilized military operation of several million men to defeat two countries.

Again, if there was public support, and I know there isn't, but if the U.S. applied the same response to 30,000 dead Americans due to guns that they did to 9/11 they could quite literally remove most guns from the U.S. a year or so.
afc wimbledon is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 06:23 PM   #2723
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post
All activities which are destructive in one way or another, the violent death of an animal or the violent destruction of a target.
Yes, punching holes in paper is "violent destruction" personified.
GoinAllTheWay is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 07:01 PM   #2724
kermitology
It's not easy being green!
 
kermitology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoinAllTheWay View Post
Yes, punching holes in paper is "violent destruction" personified.

Actually, this is literally true. What is the image on paper targets usually? The silhouette of a person.
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
kermitology is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 07:08 PM   #2725
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

I don't really get how the current manufacture and circulation of guns is now in the states. Is there still active production? How can there not be enough guns in the world right now? It's not like all of these guns are some home brew thing. Isn't the government allowed to restrict the manufacture of guns and ammunition and limit them for military or law enforcement use only?
Wormius is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 07:12 PM   #2726
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post
Actually, this is literally true. What is the image on paper targets usually? The silhouette of a person.
It is still shooting holes in paper.

I'm no gun owner and I'm just as sick of this all as anyone else, but shooting a gun at targets is actually a fun thing to do. The last time I did it the targets were images of goofy mutant rats and aliens.

I'm not saying it's harmless, but it's so far down the chart of "bad things about guns" that it seems kind of pointless to worry about it.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 07:15 PM   #2727
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Try archery. It's cheaper.
Wormius is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 07:46 PM   #2728
wittynickname
wittyusertitle
 
wittynickname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos View Post
It is still shooting holes in paper.

I'm no gun owner and I'm just as sick of this all as anyone else, but shooting a gun at targets is actually a fun thing to do. The last time I did it the targets were images of goofy mutant rats and aliens.

I'm not saying it's harmless, but it's so far down the chart of "bad things about guns" that it seems kind of pointless to worry about it.

If all these people who love their target shooting want to open a gun club and keep their weapons there and destroy paper targets to their hearts' content, I'm all for it. Just keep the weapons at the club. If you're using them for a hobby and for sport, you don't need it at home.

And really, even in the security of a gun range of this nature, a young girl managed to kill her instructor because she wasn't properly able to control the weapon she was given. Because a very young girl should be handling automatic/semi-automatic weaponry. Because America.
wittynickname is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:11 PM   #2729
blueski
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AltaGuy View Post
Please tell me more about these daily terror attacks and how arming ourselves with guns shall help (if it ever gets that bad).
Yeah fair enough, wasn't that thought out. Cocealed carry though, if it was really difficult to get, courses, exams, etc etc. So maybe you'd have 3% of the population. Similar to the air marshal program. In any given public setting there would be responsible people actively armed. For the rest it would be illegal. Like a volunteer reserve of deputies.

I just don't see USA disarming without a civil war. They are too far down the path to simply ban all guns. Maybe something like this is the practical way forward.
blueski is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:14 PM   #2730
blueski
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
I don't really get how the current manufacture and circulation of guns is now in the states. Is there still active production? How can there not be enough guns in the world right now? It's not like all of these guns are some home brew thing. Isn't the government allowed to restrict the manufacture of guns and ammunition and limit them for military or law enforcement use only?
Every time there is an incident like this sales and gun company stocks go way up. The public panics that gun laws will get stricter so they load up.
blueski is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to blueski For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2015, 08:22 PM   #2731
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
I don't really get how the current manufacture and circulation of guns is now in the states. Is there still active production? How can there not be enough guns in the world right now? It's not like all of these guns are some home brew thing. Isn't the government allowed to restrict the manufacture of guns and ammunition and limit them for military or law enforcement use only?
From Business Insider:
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-gu...-report-2015-7

Quote:
In 2013, the most current statistics available, 10,884,792 guns were manufactured in the United States, a spike of more than 2 million over the previous year. (The count excludes guns manufactured for the US military.)

...

Overall, gun manufacturing has skyrocketed since 2009, the year Barack Obama — who has pushed for some limits on gun ownership — assumed the presidency.
In 2009, 5,555,818 guns were manufactured in the United States, a jump of more than 1 million over the previous year. Since then, gun manufacturing has nearly doubled.


Here's the table of gun production from the ATF report Business Insider is reporting on.
Spoiler!


Edit: WOW. Obama is the best thing that's ever happened to the gun industry. Take a look at the overall production numbers which are, on the whole, pretty flat from 1986-2007. 1988 and 1989 and a number of other years saw more guns manufactured than in 2007. 2008, Obama starts picking up steam in the election and gun-manufacturing starts to spike and has rocketed up every year since.

Last edited by driveway; 12-03-2015 at 08:39 PM.
driveway is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to driveway For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2015, 08:34 PM   #2732
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueski View Post
Every time there is an incident like this sales and gun company stocks go way up. The public panics that gun laws will get stricter so they load up.

If the government fears it has no ability to limit the sale of guns, why doesn't it just shut the doors on the manufacture. At least plug one hole.

It's kind of pie in the sky stuff, but Bill Gates or Zuckerberg have enough wealth to buy these companies out, give the employees enough to never want to work again, and be done with this.
Wormius is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:36 PM   #2733
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
If the government fears it has no ability to limit the sale of guns, why doesn't it just shut the doors on the manufacture. At least plug one hole.

It's kind of pie in the sky stuff, but Bill Gates or Zuckerberg have enough wealth to buy these companies out, give the employees enough to never want to work again, and be done with this.
And then those employees get rich making something the public wants...
Street Pharmacist is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:41 PM   #2734
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
If the government fears it has no ability to limit the sale of guns, why doesn't it just shut the doors on the manufacture. At least plug one hole.
If government tried to do this, the manufacturers would sue on 2nd amendment grounds and win easily.

This is why repeal of the 2nd and eventual confiscation is the only real long-term solution.
driveway is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:53 PM   #2735
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Forgive my ignorance, how is shutting down manufacturing and sales from gun / ammo manufacturers a 2nd amendment issue? It's not prohibiting people from owning guns. It's just stemming the flow of new guns, at least as a stop gap measure until real 2nd amendment reform can be enacted.
Wormius is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 08:58 PM   #2736
irrevocable
Scoring Winger
 
irrevocable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 17th Ave :D
Exp:
Default

Poverty, class warfare, hopelessness.. continuing and abundant mental illness. Yeah, America is right ####ed.
irrevocable is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 09:05 PM   #2737
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Forgive my ignorance, how is shutting down manufacturing and sales from gun / ammo manufacturers a 2nd amendment issue? It's not prohibiting people from owning guns. It's just stemming the flow of new guns, at least as a stop gap measure until real 2nd amendment reform can be enacted.
All laws are subject to the constitution including the second amendment. A law prohibiting the manufacturing of guns would infringe on that right as it would be a restriction for gun purchasers, manufacturers, etc.

Having studied and practiced law, lived in and having been indirectly involved with the NRA and gun advocacy, I strongly believe that gun issues in the states are not fixable. I thought this was the case but after Sandy Hook, I know it is.
Clever_Iggy is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 09:22 PM   #2738
wittynickname
wittyusertitle
 
wittynickname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
All laws are subject to the constitution including the second amendment. A law prohibiting the manufacturing of guns would infringe on that right as it would be a restriction for gun purchasers, manufacturers, etc.

Having studied and practiced law, lived in and having been indirectly involved with the NRA and gun advocacy, I strongly believe that gun issues in the states are not fixable. I thought this was the case but after Sandy Hook, I know it is.
Sadly accurate. I mean, in this country we've had an actual member of Congress shot in a mass shooting incident, and in a separate incident less than two years later, 20 grade school children were murdered--and nothing has changed.

Does a Supreme Court justice have to die? Does a prominent right winger's family need to be targeted? Is there actually anything awful enough that could make this country change something?

That said--a large number of Americans do support more stringent background checks and things of that nature. But the politicians who are supposed to be representing us are too busy pocketing money from the gun lobby, to the tune of nearly $30 million in 2014.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/ar...the-gun-lobby/


One of the best things I saw last night was Igor Volsky quoting each Republican's "thoughts and prayers" and amending them to add in how much the NRA pumped into each politician's campaign.

http://observer.com/2015/12/journali...ter-sensation/


Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of screwed up gun-nuts in the US. But there are a lot of reasonable people who are in favor of stricter gun control measures, but lobbyists have a whole lot more money than do the rest of us.
wittynickname is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to wittynickname For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2015, 09:33 PM   #2739
driveway
A Fiddler Crab
 
driveway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Forgive my ignorance, how is shutting down manufacturing and sales from gun / ammo manufacturers a 2nd amendment issue? It's not prohibiting people from owning guns. It's just stemming the flow of new guns, at least as a stop gap measure until real 2nd amendment reform can be enacted.
The argument would be that a restriction on manufacturing would infringe on the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms.

It would be a similar argument to if the government announced an intention to close all Mosques. One could argue that the government isn't saying you can't be muslim, simply that you can't have a mosque. That case would lose pretty badly on 1st amendment grounds.

Likewise, a "you can't make guns but you're allowed to own them" law would fail on 2nd amendment grounds.

Hence why the amendment needs to be repealed if meaningful gun control is to be put in place.
driveway is offline  
Old 12-03-2015, 09:48 PM   #2740
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

It would be really nice if some whack job would go out in a blaze of glory at the NRA's head office, if anyone should be gunned down like a dog it's that ####### Wayne Lapierre, I want the shooters camera phone footage of the ####### cowering behind a desk wetting himself as his well justified end comes.

I mean if your going to go postal you could at least do some good in the process.

Edited so that no thinks I actually want anyone to get shot but Christ that man makes me want to vomit.

Last edited by afc wimbledon; 12-03-2015 at 10:08 PM.
afc wimbledon is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy