No, its not that they compete. Its that they stand out because we have other "normal" bridges. I like these cool pieces of art/architecture, I just think that not everything needs to be that way. Spread it around a little. Build an iconic overpass, say at 162nd Ave!
How about something like this?
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
I pretty much agree. Centre Street and Peace make the cut for sure, but I'm not sure about the order. I would've put C St first but it seems like Peace might be more iconic (certainly seems that way if you throw "Calgary bridge" into Google Image Search, though that could be just the novelty factor still). I'm on the fence about adding Louise to the group, but Langevin and St. Patrick's Island (when it's done) definitely miss the cut.
I think if you were to take the two side by side (Peace v Centre) the Peace Bridge would win. Centre St has history on it's side so that might factor into it more.
If Steven Seagal ever films an action movie on the Peace Bridge that would tip it in it's favor.
I always liked the Centre Street bridge from afar, and the sightlines going into downtown is nice, but I always felt the actual surface of the thing was not that great. It's a very uninviting bridge to walk across.
I wish we had a wider river to work with. As nice as the Bow is, it's pretty dinky in size to build anything too grand. Time to start digging and turn it into the Danube of the prairies.
I wish we had a wider river to work with. As nice as the Bow is, it's pretty dinky in size to build anything too grand. Time to start digging and turn it into the Danube of the prairies.
A narrower river means we should be able to build more high quality bridges and at a higher density, than, say, Edmonton.
The next bridge should be a zipline. Or a modified T-shirt cannon to launch people. The first couple dozen people will get a raw deal, but after that, there should be a relatively soft pile of shattered corpses to land on.
It seems like building bridges is one of those things where being an engineer is more important than being an architect. Even Calatrava himself is a structural engineer.
Yup. Bridges, for the most part, are designed by engineers. Architects can do it to, but at the end of the day, the structural integrity of it has to be validated and confirmed by a structural engineer.