I am not sure why everyone is jumping to conclusions based on some media information.
This is likely a very complicated legal issue and we know pretty much zero facts.
The only thing that can be said with certainty here is we really have no knowledge of who, if anyone, is at fault here.
Has anyone here read the entire contract?
For all we know, the contract may have provided for the ability for either or both sides to walk away if certain things happened.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|