Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-03-2010, 10:38 AM   #241
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default


Last edited by You Need a Thneed; 09-03-2010 at 10:45 AM.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2010, 09:27 PM   #242
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Looks like they're starting to get the tunnel sections up along 17th Ave by 37th Street



Credit to yyc_engineer at SSP
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
Old 09-14-2010, 08:20 PM   #243
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Here's a cool video of one of the guideway segments being lifted into place by the launching truss from a truck on 14th Street.

frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2010, 10:30 PM   #244
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

New round of pictures - credit to yyc_engineer on SSP.

Inside look at one of the tunnel sections near 38th Street. This will fit only one direction, with the opposite direction running parallel in another tunnel right next to it.


Tunnel construction from the outside. Concrete forms.


Tunnel work will reach here eventually. Looking east toward 37th Street


View looking east from the top of Sunalta Station. About 3 weeks until major concrete work is done here.


View looking east from the top of Sunalta Station.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2010, 11:15 PM   #245
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Also worth noting:

Several of the new LRVs have arrived over the last couple months and have been undergoing testing. They should start hitting the rails for revenue service within a matter of weeks.

Here's a couple pictures, both by "LRT" on CPTDB.

Notice the more streamlined exterior and the cameras mounted on the sides where the mirrors were on the older units.


Perhaps the biggest difference most will notice, the new seating arrangement seen in this shot of the interior.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 11:24 PM   #246
RedCoffee
Scoring Winger
 
RedCoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

All the seats will be sideways?

Looks like alot of standing room though which will be nice during rush hour.
RedCoffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 11:28 PM   #247
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

^Yes, all "perimeter seating" whereby everyone seated is looking toward the inside of the train.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 08:26 AM   #248
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
^Yes, all "perimeter seating" whereby everyone seated is looking toward the inside of the train.
This is way overdue. I read somewhere that the actual number of seats is only slightly fewer than the "old" configuration, but the standing capacity is obviously much better.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 08:50 AM   #249
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If they want more people standing why not put a bar in the middle so more people can hang on?
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 08:53 AM   #250
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
This is way overdue. I read somewhere that the actual number of seats is only slightly fewer than the "old" configuration, but the standing capacity is obviously much better.
Anyone have a link for this? I have no doubt the total capacity is much higher due to more room for standees, but it seems like there must be way fewer actual seats.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 09:10 AM   #251
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Anyone have a link for this? I have no doubt the total capacity is much higher due to more room for standees, but it seems like there must be way fewer actual seats.
I'm trying to find a link somewhere, but I am quite sure that I read it in the SSP forum. I'll keep looking and post when I find it. I remember being surprised at how close the similar the seated capacities were.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 09:32 AM   #252
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

That just means more jostling for seats and pushing/shoving when it comes to getting on the train. Excellent.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 09:53 AM   #253
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Anyone have a link for this? I have no doubt the total capacity is much higher due to more room for standees, but it seems like there must be way fewer actual seats.
Despite my best efforts to find a link to something from the manufacturer, the city, or the media reports, all that I could find was the discussion on SSP that I was remembering:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show....php?p=4876855

Basically, the current SD-160 cars have a capacity of 60, and it was estimated that the new side-seating configuration would remove 4 or 8 seats per car and would obviously increase the standing capacity by more than that.

I have found that this type of configuration works well in other, bigger cities around the world. It is a good compromise between providing plenty of seats for off-peak times, and providing standing capacity for the sardine can during rush hour.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimmy Stang For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2010, 10:44 AM   #254
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
If they want more people standing why not put a bar in the middle so more people can hang on?
There are poles in the middle if you look at the picture. If you mean the very middle of the train where the circle is on the floor, you can't put a pole there because that is the articulation and it rotates as the train is going around bends.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
That just means more jostling for seats and pushing/shoving when it comes to getting on the train. Excellent.
While there are less seats, passenger flow should be much better due to the more efficient arrangement, especially in the spaces between the doors. There are less seats and people's legs getting in the way of standees. On the older SD160s with the "knee-to-back" seating arrangement, movement through the aisles between doors is quite difficult because there isn't much space between the rows of seats.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
Despite my best efforts to find a link to something from the manufacturer, the city, or the media reports, all that I could find was the discussion on SSP that I was remembering:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show....php?p=4876855

Basically, the current SD-160 cars have a capacity of 60, and it was estimated that the new side-seating configuration would remove 4 or 8 seats per car and would obviously increase the standing capacity by more than that.

I have found that this type of configuration works well in other, bigger cities around the world. It is a good compromise between providing plenty of seats for off-peak times, and providing standing capacity for the sardine can during rush hour.
Yes. There actually are not very many seats being removed, but the capacity will increase significantly. It's just a much more efficient design due to much less conflict between standees and either the seats or the legs of sitting passengers.

Last edited by frinkprof; 09-28-2010 at 10:51 AM.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2010, 10:45 AM   #255
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Sunalta station is going to be sweet in 80km/h winds!
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 10:49 AM   #256
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
Sunalta station is going to be sweet in 80km/h winds!
is any place sweet in 80km/h winds?
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 10:50 AM   #257
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Hey Frink, Im too lazy to ask at SSP, but do you know if Sunalta station is going to built using the prefab blocks & launching truss, or just traditional concrete pouring. Its hard to tell what's on top of the station's piers with all the scaffolding around there.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 10:53 AM   #258
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay View Post
Hey Frink, Im too lazy to ask at SSP, but do you know if Sunalta station is going to built using the prefab blocks & launching truss, or just traditional concrete pouring. Its hard to tell what's on top of the station's piers with all the scaffolding around there.
The pictures that Frink re-posted just a little while back would indicate that it'll be poured. There's a heck of a lot of rebar up there.

Edit: Here it is (Credit to YYC Engineer via Frinkprof):
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 10:55 AM   #259
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

^I think what's going to happen is there will be a base of poured concrete where you see the rebar in the pictures. On top of that will be the prefabricated platform pieces that have been used on all stations since (I think) McKnight-Westwinds (including the new ones on 7th Ave. if you have seen them). The launching truss will actually pass over the station itself, then continue lifting the guideway segments into place once it gets west of the station. It has to wait until the pour is done though.

So the actual platform height will be a few feet above where the rebar is now.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2010, 11:01 AM   #260
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It's too bad that the launching truss will presumably be sitting idle for a few weeks until the concrete is ready there.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy