Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: How would you grade the Flames draft?
A+ 99 19.04%
A 265 50.96%
A- 102 19.62%
B+ 38 7.31%
B 10 1.92%
B- 2 0.38%
C+ 0 0%
C 1 0.19%
C- 1 0.19%
D 2 0.38%
Voters: 520. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2024, 03:13 PM   #241
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
About this time last year, we had a crew wanting to fire Conroy....
I don't believe you lol
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2024, 03:14 PM   #242
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I don't believe you lol
ISTR there was a very small contingent that had the torches and pitchforks out because of the Toffoli trade.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2024, 03:22 PM   #243
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
ISTR there was a very small contingent that had the torches and pitchforks out because of the Toffoli trade.
Ohhhh, that tracks lol. Probably the same group who thought Lindholm was worth a 3rd overall.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2024, 03:24 PM   #244
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Ohhhh, that tracks lol. Probably the same group who thought Lindholm was worth a 3rd overall.
I don't recall that it was the same group. But there were a couple of posters who thought Sharangovich was just a throw-in because he'd been a healthy scratch in the playoffs.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2024, 03:25 PM   #245
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
Is this at all meaningful immediately after the draft? I'm sure any team could plug players into that model and see who they should draft at each pick to get the best expected result. I guess it's just fun to speculate on this kinda stuff.
There is how scouting services rank the players and how the teams select them.

I find that some of the scouting services are better at drafting then the teams are. The drafts the Flames draft a bunch of guys lower than they were ranked seem to work out very well. Often the reason is the upside of the guys you took vs the safe pick.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2024, 03:28 PM   #246
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Next year's draft will hopefully fill the C void and the team can start moving forward with a recurring pipeline of good, skilled NHL prospects that they will have started accumulating since 2023.

With any luck there will be a few top line Cs to choose from in the top 5 as the year progresses.
Looks to be 3 C's early on in the draft projections in top 5 next season. That's not including McQueen who could slide in there to. Definitely projecting to be a good draft for Centers in the top 5.

The real home run would be getting Mckenna in 26 though.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Samonadreau For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2024, 03:30 PM   #247
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Or maybe parts of three players in his model

Parekh 0.9
Basha 0.7
Gridin 0.6

(guessing)
probable even further incremental bits. like a .16 for Mews (I think this is how this would all work?)


https://x.com/ByronMBader/status/1807093263901523979
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2024, 03:45 PM   #248
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1808245639849168944
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2024, 03:49 PM   #249
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Still wish the Flames grabbed Poirier when they could. Buium vs Parekh is going to be interesting to follow as well
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2024, 03:52 PM   #250
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Wasn't it essentially confirmed Buium was gonna do the U.S or nothing thing with his NCAA powers. I've read that from a couple different places. So who effing cares about Buium. It's probably why Yakemchuk was taken over him as well.

I'm happy they didn't gamble with that.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-03-2024, 03:54 PM   #251
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Wasn't it essentially confirmed Buium was gonna do the U.S or nothing thing with his NCAA powers. I've read that from a couple different places. So who effing cares about Buium. It's probably why Yakemchuk was taken over him as well.

I'm happy they didn't gamble with that.
I don't believe there were any reports, however SureLoss pointed out that his rep/agent is the same as Cutter Gauthier's who just pulled the power move to get traded from Philly.

All things considered, I agree the risk wasn't worth it when Parekh was available.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 08:21 AM   #252
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
Is this at all meaningful immediately after the draft? I'm sure any team could plug players into that model and see who they should draft at each pick to get the best expected result. I guess it's just fun to speculate on this kinda stuff.
I do think a team could just draft using a consensus average and be very popular with basement scouts after the draft.

The question becomes ... were the basement scouts and scouting services that make up the consensus ahead of NHL teams with skill and hockey sense? Or will there be a correction where ignoring size completely bites you in the ass?

The Flames were out of order, so they clearly weren't just drafting by consensus, but they do seem to be valuing skill and hockey IQ highly, which makes their list look good.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 07-04-2024, 03:14 PM   #253
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Two people rated it a “D”. Like, WTF?
People vote for the Marxist-Leninist party. 96% of people gave it a B+ and up so I think fans are pretty happy about this draft.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 11:59 PM   #254
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Wasn't it essentially confirmed Buium was gonna do the U.S or nothing thing with his NCAA powers. I've read that from a couple different places. So who effing cares about Buium. It's probably why Yakemchuk was taken over him as well.

I'm happy they didn't gamble with that.
The reverse of that is also that the Parekh family has a backstory that is about as Canadian as it gets and they sound very grateful and humble that being in Canada has presented them with opportunities and a path for a better life. Parekh is probably going to be proud to ply his trade in Canada.

I have no opinion on Buium and have no idea where his priorities are, but there is always a risk I guess that some American players will try to fast track their way to an American market. Not all will do that, but it happens enough that I think Canadian teams do need to weigh that risk.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2024, 06:06 AM   #255
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Wasn't it essentially confirmed Buium was gonna do the U.S or nothing thing with his NCAA powers. I've read that from a couple different places. So who effing cares about Buium. It's probably why Yakemchuk was taken over him as well.

I'm happy they didn't gamble with that.
Hey!! Not every American player that plays in the US college system will do that for sure! Some don't, and plus, maybe it'll be different for the Flames!
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 07:42 AM   #256
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
People vote for the Marxist-Leninist party. 96% of people gave it a B+ and up so I think fans are pretty happy about this draft.
People that vote for M-L believe in that cause. Are there really people who believe the team failed at the draft? And why?

Or are they just being dicks for attention?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 08:12 AM   #257
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

to get four of the 21 top PNHLE players (including #3) at picks 9, 28, 41, 74 speaks volumes to how strong Calgary's amateur scouting is. Of course they've had some misses over the years, especially the 2023/2014 draft, but they've produced so many quality NHLers since 2008 even outside the first round:

TJ Brodie in the 4th round
Micheal Ferland in the 5th round
John Gaudreau in the 4th round
Brett Kulak in the 4th round
Oliver Kylington in the 2nd round
Andrew Mangiapane in the 6th round
Rasmus Andersson in the 2nd round
Adam Fox in the 3rd round
Martin Pospisil in the 4th round
Dustin Wolf in the 7th round
Ryan Lomberg undrafted dev camp
Garnet Hathaway undrafted college FA
and honestly Matthew Phillips in the 7th round and Adam Ruzicka in the 4th round were still good picks.

The Flames still need to draft higher. Get players at the center position whose name could someday be spoken of on the same breath as Bedard (1OA), Barkov(2OA), Matthews(1OA), Eichel(2OA), MacKinnon(1OA). Once we do that, this team will have no difficulty surrounding then with hungry, competitive, productive, skilled, intelligent teammates. Amateur scouting is the Flames' greatest strength by far.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 07-05-2024 at 08:17 AM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2024, 11:07 AM   #258
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
People that vote for M-L believe in that cause.
People who believe in that cause are completely out of touch with reality.

Quote:
Are there really people who believe the team failed at the draft? And why?
Yup. They're completely out of touch with (that particular part of) reality.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 11:41 AM   #259
jatylo
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Exp:
Default

I would rate it a A-
Really happy with most of the picks
Just questioning the Gridin pick and would have liked to use the Hoskin pick to take a swing on Kiviharju who was consistently ranked in the top 10 a few years ago.

Plus it would have been great to find another 5th round pick for Poirier.

But I'm mostly complaining about late round picks which are just found money if they pan out
jatylo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 10:54 AM   #260
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Just rewatched rounds 2-7. Sam Cosentino is so cringe, but anyway......

There was a huge trend this year of teams reaching for size. Not sure if they are all kanzig's or not.

Predators picks' height in rounds 3 onwards: 5' 10", 6' 3", 6' 2", 6' 3", 6' 1".

Sens 2nd round onwards: 6' 7", 6' 2", 6' 3", 6' 4", 6' 4"

I assume this is part of the reason why we were able to snag mid-sized skill guys like Mews and Misa in later rounds.

I have no problem zigging while other teams zag, as long as we find our size and hard nosed players somewhere. Bahl in that trade. Last year we were all over size in the draft.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy