| 
				  
 
			
			Can't quote you Text:
 
 I actually wrote you a long response - then I remembered you ridiculed me in the past for long responses.  I am going to keep it brief.
 
 
 Your analogy is flawed at a basic level, not because you attempted to use an analogy.  Of course an analogy is useful in illuminating a point or idea, but only when it is a good analogy. Otherwise, it just creates more confusion.  Yours had that effect.  For starters, the Governor General represents the Monarchy of a foreign nation.  Last time I checked, the captain of the Flames does not represent the original owners of the Atlanta Flames.  A better analogy would be... the role of the male lion in a pride.  I don't know.  I didn't think an analogy was necessary here at all as the role of the captain is fairly well understood - it is the impact that we are disagreeing on, no?  So no, the analogy that you came up with does not shed any light at all.
 
 
 I will just skip down to your final point here for brevity.  I do not come here for the mockery, the insinuations of stupidity, and so on.  I come here for good discussions, and a good discussion is usually to be found with a differing viewpoint, rather than an echo chamber.  That's boring.  What's worse than boring?  Fighting with some random person online that you don't care about and stopped listening to a long time ago because of HOW that person engages. I think it is best that we just agree to disagree here, since you are 100% right and neither one of us finds the other's opinion remotely convincing.
 |