Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2013, 08:19 PM   #241
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
Ok, first off I used to work in the patch in northern BC and Alberta so I'm not "anti-Alberta and anti-oil".

And I don't profess to be a business or economics expert however I think we all saw what speculation and "pumping" up of stocks led to in the world economy in 2008.

Just because I posted a globe and mail article doesn't mean I don't get info from other sources either.
I didn't say you did. I said the G&M is anti alberta and anti oil.

I'm sure you get info from lots of places, but posting a G&M article to prove a point about the true value of the CAD is not credible. Nothing against you, just your source is a hot steaming pile of garbage.

My point is that the CAD is not artificially inflated, its current value is a true representation of its value. If it wasn't those speculators, would adjust its true value by way of selling the crap out of it.

What happened in 2008 has nothing to do with the CAD value being over or under or truly valued in the marketplace. 2008 exposes massive flaws in market economies and democracies, but none of those flaws have to do with 2013 CADs.
Flames in 07 is offline  
Old 03-18-2013, 09:07 PM   #242
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
How did the liberals plan on devaluing the currency?
I would also like an answer to this question.

My layman's understanding of economics leads me to believe that it's the Bank of Canada -- not the party in power -- that can most directly influence the value of the dollar through measures such as changing interest rates or altering the monetary supply. What did the Liberal governments of 1993-2006 do that devalued the currency? Be specific.
MarchHare is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 11:38 AM   #243
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

So sick of the Cons, Flaherty just interfered with a financial institutions ability to operate in a free market. What a farce. He praises Canadian banks on one hand for being prudent lenders then tell them that their borrowing rate is too low on the other. Heaven forbid we save a few bucks on our mortgages. So ridiculous.
Zulu29 is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 12:23 PM   #244
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29 View Post
So sick of the Cons, Flaherty just interfered with a financial institutions ability to operate in a free market. What a farce. He praises Canadian banks on one hand for being prudent lenders then tell them that their borrowing rate is too low on the other. Heaven forbid we save a few bucks on our mortgages. So ridiculous.
There are plenty of regulations that affect a banks ability to operate in a free market. While I don't necessarily agree with the move I think the idea is to stave off a rate war amongst the banks. There is concern that people are already overborrowing in this low rate climate and could be in trouble when the rates inevitably go back up. Considering that the government guarantees the majority of these mortgages I don't think it's an extreme position. That being said I prefer to let free markets remain as free as possible.
Jacks is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 01:34 PM   #245
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Trudeau would sure fix things right up though... "just watch him".

Its not enough he is riding daddys coattails....now he is even using one of his more famous catchphrases.





http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2..._airplane.html
transplant99 is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 01:38 PM   #246
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

What an arrogant doosh, without the smarts and political savvy of his father.
zamler is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:15 PM   #247
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
What an arrogant doosh, without the smarts and political savvy of his father.
That's arrogant? What do you expect him to say here? "No, I actually don't think so. In fact if you elect me as leader I'll probably lose and we might not even get back to official opposition."
Slava is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:27 PM   #248
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
That's arrogant? What do you expect him to say here? "No, I actually don't think so. In fact if you elect me as leader I'll probably lose and we might not even get back to official opposition."
LOL, just lol.

Aunt Sally dialed up to 11. How about he comes up with some original thoughts instead of thinking he can just invoke phrases from his father and waltz in and become PM. That's about as arrogant as it gets.
zamler is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:35 PM   #249
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
LOL, just lol.

Aunt Sally dialed up to 11. How about he comes up with some original thoughts instead of thinking he can just invoke phrases from his father and waltz in and become PM. That's about as arrogant as it gets.
Again though, of course this is his sentiment. I have no doubt that any politician, whether they think they can actually win or not, is going to publicly tell everyone that they will. Its not arrogant, its just common-sense. No one will support a candidate for leader of any party if the candidate says anything other than that.

You think that Harper would've said anything else if he were asked in 2003 whether he could beat the Liberals? Would Mulcair have a different reply today, or even Elizabeth May?
Slava is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:35 PM   #250
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

I've been quite clear that I'm no huge backer of Trudeau, but you guys are really grasping at straws if you think how he signed that note is in any way meaningful at all.
MarchHare is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2013, 02:40 PM   #251
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
Daradon is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:43 PM   #252
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Of course had Trudeau signed the letter "Nah kid, I'm gonna get my ass kicked", the people calling him arrogant would call him some other name. We get it, every time the name Trudeau comes up you wanna strangle a kitten.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:43 PM   #253
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
They can't raise rates at this point because it would likely cause too much tightening and quell whatever recovery there has been to this point. This is the main issue; they have to get some inflation going, but not too much. Flaherty doesn't want Canadians to keep borrowing (but we are), so he's meddling in the markets.

I would love to know what the "conversation" was between Manulife and Flaherty yesterday though. That would be very interesting to say the least.
Slava is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:44 PM   #254
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
The government can't manipulate BoC interest rates. Only Mark Carney has that power, and he operates at arm's length from the government.
MarchHare is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:50 PM   #255
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Again though, of course this is his sentiment. I have no doubt that any politician, whether they think they can actually win or not, is going to publicly tell everyone that they will. Its not arrogant, its just common-sense. No one will support a candidate for leader of any party if the candidate says anything other than that.

You think that Harper would've said anything else if he were asked in 2003 whether he could beat the Liberals? Would Mulcair have a different reply today, or even Elizabeth May?
It's the way Trudeau is going about things. He has almost no substance at all, running 90% on his last name. So he invokes a famous phrase from his father and tosses in that he's going to beat Harper. Yes that's arrogance, and not a good kind either.

It's also extremely stupid because the more Justin drags up images of his Father, the more he is going to polarize and worse alienate voters that would rather toss themselves off a cliff than see Canada return to the days of PET.
zamler is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:53 PM   #256
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Of course he's running on his last name though. If Ben Mulroney were running he wouldn't be promoting his time on Canadian Idol!
Slava is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 02:54 PM   #257
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
So he invokes a famous phrase from his father and tosses in that he's going to beat Harper. Yes that's arrogance, and not a good kind either
Umm, you do know that was the question the kid asked right? Would he prefer he just not answer it? Or would a simple, boring "Yes, I will" have been better? Grasping at straws indeed...
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2013, 03:17 PM   #258
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the note is a non-issue, not sure anyone I know would care. Aren't politicians supposed to have some level of bravado?
burn_this_city is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 03:41 PM   #259
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
They can't raise rates at this point because it would likely cause too much tightening and quell whatever recovery there has been to this point. This is the main issue; they have to get some inflation going, but not too much. Flaherty doesn't want Canadians to keep borrowing (but we are), so he's meddling in the markets.

I would love to know what the "conversation" was between Manulife and Flaherty yesterday though. That would be very interesting to say the least.
Yeah, I understood that reason. Basically skirting the system to get the best of both worlds then.
Daradon is offline  
Old 03-20-2013, 03:44 PM   #260
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
The government can't manipulate BoC interest rates. Only Mark Carney has that power, and he operates at arm's length from the government.
Yeah that's more what I was wondering. Doesn't the finance minster have some sway though?
Daradon is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy