03-18-2013, 08:19 PM
|
#241
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
Ok, first off I used to work in the patch in northern BC and Alberta so I'm not "anti-Alberta and anti-oil".
And I don't profess to be a business or economics expert however I think we all saw what speculation and "pumping" up of stocks led to in the world economy in 2008.
Just because I posted a globe and mail article doesn't mean I don't get info from other sources either.
|
I didn't say you did. I said the G&M is anti alberta and anti oil.
I'm sure you get info from lots of places, but posting a G&M article to prove a point about the true value of the CAD is not credible. Nothing against you, just your source is a hot steaming pile of garbage.
My point is that the CAD is not artificially inflated, its current value is a true representation of its value. If it wasn't those speculators, would adjust its true value by way of selling the crap out of it.
What happened in 2008 has nothing to do with the CAD value being over or under or truly valued in the marketplace. 2008 exposes massive flaws in market economies and democracies, but none of those flaws have to do with 2013 CADs.
|
|
|
03-18-2013, 09:07 PM
|
#242
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
How did the liberals plan on devaluing the currency?
|
I would also like an answer to this question.
My layman's understanding of economics leads me to believe that it's the Bank of Canada -- not the party in power -- that can most directly influence the value of the dollar through measures such as changing interest rates or altering the monetary supply. What did the Liberal governments of 1993-2006 do that devalued the currency? Be specific.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 11:38 AM
|
#243
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
|
So sick of the Cons, Flaherty just interfered with a financial institutions ability to operate in a free market. What a farce. He praises Canadian banks on one hand for being prudent lenders then tell them that their borrowing rate is too low on the other. Heaven forbid we save a few bucks on our mortgages. So ridiculous.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 12:23 PM
|
#244
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zulu29
So sick of the Cons, Flaherty just interfered with a financial institutions ability to operate in a free market. What a farce. He praises Canadian banks on one hand for being prudent lenders then tell them that their borrowing rate is too low on the other. Heaven forbid we save a few bucks on our mortgages. So ridiculous.
|
There are plenty of regulations that affect a banks ability to operate in a free market. While I don't necessarily agree with the move I think the idea is to stave off a rate war amongst the banks. There is concern that people are already overborrowing in this low rate climate and could be in trouble when the rates inevitably go back up. Considering that the government guarantees the majority of these mortgages I don't think it's an extreme position. That being said I prefer to let free markets remain as free as possible.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 01:34 PM
|
#245
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Trudeau would sure fix things right up though... "just watch him".
Its not enough he is riding daddys coattails....now he is even using one of his more famous catchphrases.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2..._airplane.html
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#246
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
What an arrogant doosh, without the smarts and political savvy of his father.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:15 PM
|
#247
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
What an arrogant doosh, without the smarts and political savvy of his father.
|
That's arrogant? What do you expect him to say here? "No, I actually don't think so. In fact if you elect me as leader I'll probably lose and we might not even get back to official opposition."
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:27 PM
|
#248
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
That's arrogant? What do you expect him to say here? "No, I actually don't think so. In fact if you elect me as leader I'll probably lose and we might not even get back to official opposition."
|
LOL, just lol.
Aunt Sally dialed up to 11. How about he comes up with some original thoughts instead of thinking he can just invoke phrases from his father and waltz in and become PM. That's about as arrogant as it gets.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#249
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
LOL, just lol.
Aunt Sally dialed up to 11. How about he comes up with some original thoughts instead of thinking he can just invoke phrases from his father and waltz in and become PM. That's about as arrogant as it gets.
|
Again though, of course this is his sentiment. I have no doubt that any politician, whether they think they can actually win or not, is going to publicly tell everyone that they will. Its not arrogant, its just common-sense. No one will support a candidate for leader of any party if the candidate says anything other than that.
You think that Harper would've said anything else if he were asked in 2003 whether he could beat the Liberals? Would Mulcair have a different reply today, or even Elizabeth May?
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#250
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
|
I've been quite clear that I'm no huge backer of Trudeau, but you guys are really grasping at straws if you think how he signed that note is in any way meaningful at all.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:40 PM
|
#251
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:43 PM
|
#252
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Of course had Trudeau signed the letter "Nah kid, I'm gonna get my ass kicked", the people calling him arrogant would call him some other name. We get it, every time the name Trudeau comes up you wanna strangle a kitten.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:43 PM
|
#253
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
|
They can't raise rates at this point because it would likely cause too much tightening and quell whatever recovery there has been to this point. This is the main issue; they have to get some inflation going, but not too much. Flaherty doesn't want Canadians to keep borrowing (but we are), so he's meddling in the markets.
I would love to know what the "conversation" was between Manulife and Flaherty yesterday though. That would be very interesting to say the least.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:44 PM
|
#254
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
Here's what I don't get about the rate manipulation. Why wouldn't they just have the BoC raise their rate. The banks would follow suit and it wouldn't be so heavy handed. I thought the Canadian lawmakers were more in charge of the BoC than the division they have down south. Someone here probably knows the finer points.
|
The government can't manipulate BoC interest rates. Only Mark Carney has that power, and he operates at arm's length from the government.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:50 PM
|
#255
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Again though, of course this is his sentiment. I have no doubt that any politician, whether they think they can actually win or not, is going to publicly tell everyone that they will. Its not arrogant, its just common-sense. No one will support a candidate for leader of any party if the candidate says anything other than that.
You think that Harper would've said anything else if he were asked in 2003 whether he could beat the Liberals? Would Mulcair have a different reply today, or even Elizabeth May?
|
It's the way Trudeau is going about things. He has almost no substance at all, running 90% on his last name. So he invokes a famous phrase from his father and tosses in that he's going to beat Harper. Yes that's arrogance, and not a good kind either.
It's also extremely stupid because the more Justin drags up images of his Father, the more he is going to polarize and worse alienate voters that would rather toss themselves off a cliff than see Canada return to the days of PET.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:53 PM
|
#256
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Of course he's running on his last name though. If Ben Mulroney were running he wouldn't be promoting his time on Canadian Idol!
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 02:54 PM
|
#257
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
So he invokes a famous phrase from his father and tosses in that he's going to beat Harper. Yes that's arrogance, and not a good kind either
|
Umm, you do know that was the question the kid asked right? Would he prefer he just not answer it? Or would a simple, boring "Yes, I will" have been better? Grasping at straws indeed...
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-20-2013, 03:17 PM
|
#258
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
I think the note is a non-issue, not sure anyone I know would care. Aren't politicians supposed to have some level of bravado?
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 03:41 PM
|
#259
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
They can't raise rates at this point because it would likely cause too much tightening and quell whatever recovery there has been to this point. This is the main issue; they have to get some inflation going, but not too much. Flaherty doesn't want Canadians to keep borrowing (but we are), so he's meddling in the markets.
I would love to know what the "conversation" was between Manulife and Flaherty yesterday though. That would be very interesting to say the least.
|
Yeah, I understood that reason. Basically skirting the system to get the best of both worlds then.
|
|
|
03-20-2013, 03:44 PM
|
#260
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
The government can't manipulate BoC interest rates. Only Mark Carney has that power, and he operates at arm's length from the government.
|
Yeah that's more what I was wondering. Doesn't the finance minster have some sway though?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.
|
|