Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: When will the ring road be completed?
1-3 years 8 3.85%
4-7 years 91 43.75%
7-10 years 65 31.25%
10-20 years 20 9.62%
Never 24 11.54%
Voters: 208. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-27-2014, 01:13 PM   #2481
shermanator
Franchise Player
 
shermanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
If money was no object, nobody would have a problem with this. Is there a project in particular that is of more potential benefit to more people than a fully-functional ring road?
I would argue that in addition to the NC-SELRT line, the upgrade of Crowchild from 17th ave SW to 24th ave NW would be a project that could benefit more Calgarians than the ring road. Considering Crowchild is backed up due to the bottleneck almost every day

Of course, I have no idea of how many vehicles per day are anticipated on the ring road or the NC-SELRT vs how many vehicles per day on Crowchild. That's really the number that will give the biggest indicator of benefit to Calgarians.

The ring road is definitely needed, I won't argue that point, but yes the $5B price tag does make it tough to swallow.
__________________

shermanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:14 PM   #2482
kevman
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Does anyone know what population estimates the road is being built toward? If the road is sized for ~1 million trips a day are we talking about a city of 3, 4, 5 million plus!?

Maybe I'm just cynical but when does building for the future ever work out as planned? We plan for expansion all the time at work and in the end the expansion never gets built or if it does it's completely different than what was envisioned as little as 5 years earlier.

Hell people get it wrong all the time with things as simple as their own homes...
kevman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kevman For This Useful Post:
Old 08-27-2014, 01:19 PM   #2483
Magnum PEI
Lifetime Suspension
 
Magnum PEI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
I'm definately biased in that I will never ever drive this road, but I think that $5B would be much better spent in building a North Central / South East LRT line.
That's what I said when council approved the Airport Tunnel. I know better now.
Magnum PEI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:27 PM   #2484
kevman
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Just for fun:

The Peace Bridge cost $25,000,000 and sees 5,000 users a day for a cost of $5,000 per day user.

The ring road that will cost $5,000,000,000 will need 1,000,000 users a day to be at the same cost per day user as the Peace Bridge. If only 100,000 people use this leg in a day it is 10 times more expensive per user than the finger trap.

Yeah, I went there.
kevman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:29 PM   #2485
Handsome B. Wonderful
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Handsome B. Wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shermanator View Post
I would argue that in addition to the NC-SELRT line, the upgrade of Crowchild from 17th ave SW to 24th ave NW would be a project that could benefit more Calgarians than the ring road. Considering Crowchild is backed up due to the bottleneck almost every day.
The city came up with a plan that completely redesigned a significant portion of that road in manner that actually solved transportation issues, so of course the inner city dwellers pitched a hissy fit and shot it down.
Handsome B. Wonderful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:41 PM   #2486
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Handsome B. Wonderful View Post
The city came up with a plan that completely redesigned a significant portion of that road in manner that actually solved transportation issues, so of course the inner city dwellers pitched a hissy fit and shot it down.
Shouldn't they have? It was designed with 1950s highway design mentality. Surely the same ends could be achieved without bulldozing entire blocks of neighbourhoods. The project was sent back to the drawing board in a 15-0 vote at Council, so it wasn't just inner city folks balking, the 9 suburban councillors agreed.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:44 PM   #2487
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

I'm curious, is there a link to that plan anywhere?
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 01:53 PM   #2488
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
Shouldn't they have? It was designed with 1950s highway design mentality. Surely the same ends could be achieved without bulldozing entire blocks of neighbourhoods. The project was sent back to the drawing board in a 15-0 vote at Council, so it wasn't just inner city folks balking, the 9 suburban councillors agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Handsome B. Wonderful View Post
The city came up with a plan that completely redesigned a significant portion of that road in manner that actually solved transportation issues, so of course the inner city dwellers pitched a hissy fit and shot it down.
Crowchild Trail redevelopment is doomed. I can't see any possibly solution at this point. I think the only thing that could be viable, although probably quite costly, would be to build a new roadway above the existing Crowchild. Essentially some sort of design which builds a new N-S Crowchild Trail elevated while maintaining the existing lower roadway for access to Memorial Drive and 6/9 (Bow Trail) and 12 Ave.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 02:01 PM   #2489
CKPThunder
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

As a side note and I apologize since I don't know what it would entail. Would it be possible to piggy back off the SW ring road project and build a flood mitigation floodway/tunnel at the same time?

Sort of divert the water from Elbow near the Reserve and send it down south along the ring road and empty it out in the south?

I have no idea what the ramifications would be of this especially for those living south of the city.
CKPThunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 02:05 PM   #2490
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the most irritating thing about some Calgarians is the attitude " well I don't use it so why are we building it "? With that attitude nothing would get built.

I dont' use transit or the education system but I pay for it. I don't use libraries, the airport tunnel, the cycle path or pools but I pay for it. If I move to High River I have the exact same problem on a smaller scale. Get over it already.
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to stampsx2 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-27-2014, 02:56 PM   #2491
kevman
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stampsx2 View Post
I think the most irritating thing about some Calgarians is the attitude " well I don't use it so why are we building it "? With that attitude nothing would get built.

I dont' use transit or the education system but I pay for it. I don't use libraries, the airport tunnel, the cycle path or pools but I pay for it. If I move to High River I have the exact same problem on a smaller scale. Get over it already.
Use it or not there is nothing wrong with questioning a $5 billion dollar price tag on a piece of public infrastructure. That's $1,250/Albertan to pay for this segment of road. Is a ring road required? Sure. Is one of this scale required? I don't really know...
kevman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kevman For This Useful Post:
Old 08-27-2014, 02:59 PM   #2492
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Do we even know if this will be the opening day configuration or if it's just the eventual end design? What phases will this road be opened with? Opening with interchanges/ramps missing like the NW portion?
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:06 PM   #2493
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

I think the issue that everyone is highlighting is the fact that the bridges will be built to handle the ultimate design regardless of what the 'Opening day configuration' is.

Most of the money is in the bridge structures. You can incrementally add lanes based on demand, not so much for the bridge spans.
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:08 PM   #2494
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

omg just throw some Phil & Sebastian's along the road and have an exit that goes directly to the Ship and Anchor and they'll shut up about their damn peasant trains.


...
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:16 PM   #2495
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Flying cars...were we not promised flying cars by now.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:19 PM   #2496
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Flying cars...were we not promised flying cars by now.
Think about how poorly people drive on a flat surface. Do you really want to add a third dimension to the equation?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:58 PM   #2497
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
OMG we need to put some Tim Horton's in Texas so I can commute from there and then complain about my 5 day commute when I look at the map. Think of the sq footage I could afford for $350k in Houston.
Are you kidding, the US has incredible highway infrastructure. That commute would be 2 days tops. Although the lack of Tim Hortons is alarming.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 03:59 PM   #2498
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Haha, what a monstrosity. This sprawl needs to get reigned in.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 04:05 PM   #2499
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
Haha, what a monstrosity. This sprawl needs to get reigned in.
I don't know man, do you know what high density housing gets you?

Ebola, among other things.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2014, 04:13 PM   #2500
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

An 8 lane design with land purchased for 16 but bridges designed for only the 8 lane design would be my choice.

Keep the land available as it was very difficult to get but don't try to save money long term on the bridges by pre-investing in the 16 lane design.

I think at the point 16 lanes are required 8 lanes on highway 22 will be the correct way around the ring road. Also I have hope over the next 50 years the reserve system will be phased out and individual land ownership will take over the reserves allowing for development and expansion of the city onto Tsu Tina land. (one can hope).

The traffic / planning engineers I have talked to believe that 16 is overkill as well and I trust there judgement. Although some planners also must support this design as well.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy