"Debunked"on CP.
Ironic, since people think I post links from non legit sources.
Also, its hilarious troutman, that people that you asked about neepers sighting called it a helicopter..cool cop out answer from someone who has no clue what they are talking about.
It wasn't debunked on CP, it was explained and 'debunked', if that's how you want to term it, elsewhere. The link was just provided here for people like you who are putting up shady 'proof', or videos in the guise of proof.
Aldrins words were taken out of context and even he admitted that. Not sure what else you want.
You're arguing with two of the more respected and thoughtful posters on the board. Posters who take a lot of time and effort for their replies as you can see. Arguing with them and trying to enlighten us is not a bad thing at all, and I'm sure they enjoy it, but you want to do a little more than just throw some YouTube on there if you want to get anyone to believe you.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daradon For This Useful Post:
Thinking does not seem to be your strength or most people on CP for that matter.
Aw life on the internets is so tough for you. How can you ever show us sheeple the light? Only you know what's really going on. The rest of us have the wool pulled over our eyes, right? Help us FoxMulder.....
Let me help you out. I see that you have recently joined here. There are many people on here that have been around for a while and have seen and debunked the stuff that you have posted more than once. Sticking to something clearly wrong like the Buzz Aldrin thing is the fastest way to get dismissed out of hand around here. So is moving the goal posts. For example, you posting something, then it getting refuted and you ignoring it, then you posting something different and ignoring the responses to it, ad nauseum. Other posters have done this and they end up losing their cool (and perhaps calling everyone on CP stupid) and end up getting banned. No one is going to treat you nicely or take you seriously if you are acting like a pretentious 12 year old.
True, it's not an excuse but most people at 18 think they know more than they do. We get spoiled on this forum with the maturity of most posters. On another forum I hang out on every second post is TITS OR GTFO.
True, it's not an excuse but most people at 18 think they know more than they do. We get spoiled on this forum with the maturity of most posters. On another forum I hang out on every second post is TITS OR GTFO.
Well that alien from Total Recall did have 3 boobs, so they do have a point
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Perhaps it’s a good thing that NBC has now declared this the numero uno UFO sighting of all time. Few sightings have been so thoroughly investigated by reporters, and so well debunked. But you won’t hear that from the networks, who can’t get enough of the ratings that come with “the unexplained.”
Last edited by troutman; 11-25-2009 at 03:41 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
I would love all the debunkers and non believers out there to tell me what they think the Phoenix Lights were...oh let me guess, they were "flares"
What do you think the most logical explanation is, based on the evidence? Something man-made, natural, or alien?
I see a lot natural and anthropogenic features in the video and daily life, but nothing that suggests an alien presense. Humans have devised pretty clever arrays of lights before to.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Perhaps it’s a good thing that NBC has now declared this the numero uno UFO sighting of all time. Few sightings have been so thoroughly investigated by reporters, and so well debunked. But you won’t hear that from the networks, who can’t get enough of the ratings that come with “the unexplained.”
Sorry that link does nothing to explain it.
Thanks though
Sorry that link does nothing to explain it.
Thanks though
Can you read?
As I first revealed in the Phoenix New Times, a young man with a 10-inch Dobsonian telescope, Mitch Stanley, spotted the vee from his backyard, and saw that it was a formation of airplanes. Using a magnification of 60X — which essentially put him 60 times closer to the vee than people only using their naked eyes — Stanley could see that each light in the sky was actually a double, with one light under each squarish wing. The planes still looked small in his scope — suggesting they were flying at high altitude — and he didn’t know what type they were. But there was no doubt, he told me, that they were planes.
At about 10 pm, happened in the sky southwest of Phoenix. A string of lights appeared in the sky, and slowly sank until they disappeared behind the nearby Estrella Mountain range. This was later shown to be a string of flares dropped by the Maryland Air National Guard over the North Tac military range.
As I first revealed in the Phoenix New Times, a young man with a 10-inch Dobsonian telescope, Mitch Stanley, spotted the vee from his backyard, and saw that it was a formation of airplanes. Using a magnification of 60X — which essentially put him 60 times closer to the vee than people only using their naked eyes — Stanley could see that each light in the sky was actually a double, with one light under each squarish wing. The planes still looked small in his scope — suggesting they were flying at high altitude — and he didn’t know what type they were. But there was no doubt, he told me, that they were planes.
Planes..lol
Cool story bro.
Last edited by FoxMulder91; 11-25-2009 at 03:46 PM.
