Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
The Musqueam agreement seems to be happening to create a framework that will avoid court decisions like the Cowichan decision causing the mess and confusion it has.
On the surface, getting ahead of things and actually creating legal agreements and defining title rights is exactly what I'd hope for to avoid another court decision oopsie moment.
Though a lot is still to figure out, I'm not sure the federal agreement is the self-infliction you think it is.
The alarmist nature of there positions and posting is also comically hypocritical.
|
Sounds like the Canadian federal government went off and signed a rights agreement that says the Musqueam has rights and title within their asserted territory which covers massive swath of BC. But they did NOT bother to say what lands or waterways and gave no clarity there, which seems crazy to me but hey, investment certainty for you. And they also did NOT bother to consult any other Bands/Nations who also have asserted territory in the exact same area (which is why the Squamish nation are already upset and vowed to fight this, again more certainty for you). 23:00 in the second video.
Also sounds like the Canadian government went and declared on it's own without being forced that UNDRIP is now the minimum standard through which this agreement will be guided. The basis on which your described "oppsie" court decision happened under and that Eby himself is backtracking on after realizing his mistake. Starts around 43:00 in the first video.
I mean, this lawyer who has had experience with Aboriginal Law, has worked for the NDP and First Nations could be lying though. Or maybe he is some crazy racist, and alarmist and utterly incompetent or whatever else you want to call him.
I'm definitely not a lawyer and I'm just going off of what this apparently experienced expert and lawyer in the field is saying.