Quote:
Originally Posted by kevman
I posted the information where to get a peer reviewed journal article arguing that it's natural but it appears that everyone simply ignored my post. Sorry that I can't post the full article but that would be against CP guidelines for piracy. The article is:
"The Global Warming Debate: A Review of the State of Science"
and can be found in the journal of Pure and Applied Geophysics.
It was actually really easy to find so I can track down some more if you want. Turns out that even though Mr. Gore said that there are no Peer Reviewed articles disagreeing with him this was the first article that appeared while searching for "global warming climate change"...
|
Sorry, bud, but this has to be said.
1. You didn't provide us a link. You merely assured us that it was "peer reviewed." How do you know? Are you on their board?
2. Furthermore, what you posted is actually a review article. Review articles are subject to a completely different review process than actual, real scientific articles. It's obvious that you have no idea what a peer reviewed article actually is--and that's not your fault--I'm guessing you're not a scientist.
The fact is, this debate is over. Even the GOP in the US is coming around: John McCain admitted on the radio that "the debate is over." Even president Bush, he of the gag orders on government climate scientists, mentioned the "challenge of global climate change" in his State of the Union.
Honestly, I class the people who think global warming is a "hoax" right up there with people who don't believe in evolution, or who think Bush planned 9/11, or that the earth is flat. If you still don't believe in anthropogenic global warming, given all of the evidence, there's only one explanation: you don't want to believe it. In that case, there's no point in a debate.