Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2014, 03:01 PM   #201
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

We have a lot of frickin former Leafs. Not only could we ice an entirely former Leaf line, but it's actually a plausible line combo: Raymond-Stajan-Colborne.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 03:05 PM   #202
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Lines when Stajan comes back:

Glencross - Monahan - Jones
Gaudreau - Jooris - Hudler
Baertschi - Granlund - Byron
Bouma - Stajan - Ferland
Bollig, McGrattan

Gets tougher when Raymond and Colborne come back (most likely Baertschi/Ferland go)

When Backlund eventually comes back, Granlund will get sent down.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 03:09 PM   #203
terminator
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Lines when Stajan comes back:

Glencross - Monahan - Jones
Gaudreau - Jooris - Hudler
Baertschi - Granlund - Byron
Bouma - Stajan - Ferland
Bollig, McGrattan

Gets tougher when Raymond and Colborne come back (most likely Baertschi/Ferland go)

When Backlund eventually comes back, Granlund will get sent down.

Would they send Granlund down? Or try to move one of Bollig/Macgrattan?
terminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 03:11 PM   #204
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminator View Post
Would they send Granlund down? Or try to move one of Bollig/Macgrattan?
I don't think they would send Bollig or McGrattan down. We haven't had a healthy roster all year, so the chances of Bollig being in the press box is slim.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 03:26 PM   #205
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Chances of Granlund going down is slim if he keeps playing well. Why not waive Grats at that point?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 03:36 PM   #206
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

If it's a choice between McGrattan or Granlund as the 13th or 14th forward, it makes more sense to send Granlund down so he can play.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2014, 03:38 PM   #207
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Chances of Granlund going down is slim if he keeps playing well. Why not waive Grats at that point?
I'd rather play Ferland over Bollig (younger, better, still fights if he has to) and waive or trade Bollig. Keep Gratts as the nuclear deterrant. Cheaper and a way better fighter if it comes to playing a Scott or someone like him.

Then you'd have something like:

Glencross/Monahan/Jones
Triple J line
Granlund/Backlund/Byron or Raymond
Bouma/Stajan/Ferland

Bert gets sent for time in the A, unless one of the other kids droops. you could also keep Sven and send Ferland.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 05:54 PM   #208
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Gaudreau-Jooris-Hudler
Glencross-Monahan-Colborne
Raymond-Backlund-Jones
Baerschi-Stajan-Bouma

I wanna squeeze Byron and Granlund in there somewhere too. Can they squeeze in as our 3rd D-man line? I mean if Washington can play Mike Green... What's the worst that could happen?
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 12-03-2014 at 06:00 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 06:18 PM   #209
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I will bet that they keep Ferland up as long as possible. I think Granlund goes before he does.
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 06:24 PM   #210
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
I will bet that they keep Ferland up as long as possible. I think Granlund goes before he does.
I'll take that bet.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
Old 12-03-2014, 07:24 PM   #211
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Knight goes down first as I think he has.
Stajan goes to 4th line.
Sven is next when Raymond comes back.
Raymond 3rd line.
Ferland is next even though I really like his fit on this team.
Colborne converted over to the wing.
Grats perhaps gets put on waivers?
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 08:27 PM   #212
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Keeping Ferland over Granlund would go with Burke wanting the team to be bigger.
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 10:29 PM   #213
BlackWallStreet
Scoring Winger
 
BlackWallStreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Gaudreau-Jooris-Hudler
Glencross-Monahan-Colborne
Raymond-Backlund-Jones
Baerschi-Stajan-Bouma

I wanna squeeze Byron and Granlund in there somewhere too. Can they squeeze in as our 3rd D-man line? I mean if Washington can play Mike Green... What's the worst that could happen?

Byron will be in the linup for sure imo
BlackWallStreet is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BlackWallStreet For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2014, 01:05 AM   #214
iggyscup
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Default Lines when Colborne/Backs/Raymond are all back

Gaudreau-Monahan-Hudler
Raymond-Stajan-Colborne
Glencross-Backlund-Jones
Bouma-Jooris-Byron

Giordano-Brodie
Russell-Wideman
Wotherspoon-Smid

Sven, Granlund and Ferland go back to the AHL to play big minutes and are the first call ups.

Last edited by iggyscup; 12-05-2014 at 01:07 AM.
iggyscup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 01:52 AM   #215
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

A good problem to have, but scares me a bit. Chemistry feels so good now. I don't know how you don't put Raymond back on one of the top two lines, but I don't know how you demote the kids.

Hopefully with Hartley's magic and the team first attitude the Flames seem to have players can cycle in and out as they get hot and cold without making anyone mad.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 01:58 AM   #216
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

"Conditioning stint" on the 3rd/4th line? Would be cool to see them claw their way into a spot vs being handed a spot... but I wouldn't count on it happening this way.
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 06:53 AM   #217
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleF View Post
"Conditioning stint" on the 3rd/4th line? Would be cool to see them claw their way into a spot vs being handed a spot... but I wouldn't count on it happening this way.
Coming back from injury isn't being handed a spot. Cherry always used to say that players should never lose their spot because they get hurt. You lose the room that way. I don't agree with much of what he says, but that one rang true.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2014, 09:02 PM   #218
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Cool. Didn't know that. I totally agree.
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 09:05 PM   #219
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Agree, you can't take away Colborn and Raymonds spots because they got hurt. All it really does is put kids that are fully capable to play in the NHL a chance to rip apart the AHL. Then when the need arises, you know you have some stregth to draw upon again when injuries arise. I'm pretty excited to see Raymond and Colborne return.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 09:50 AM   #220
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

@SUNGilbertson: #Flames C Mikael Backlund skating solo this morning at Saddledome, pushing pace pretty hard as he recovers from abdominal surgery.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy