Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-23-2014, 08:35 AM   #201
ranchlandsselling
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch View Post
The funny thing in all this is that the Saudis aren't actually doing anything to make oil fall - it's purely market forces at work. Ironically they're catching crap for NOT manipulating the market like they usually do.
They're certainly enjoying throwing around numbers publically to help. Look how many news outlets carried the "we won't cut if oil hits $20.00". While not calling for $20 oil it's certianly reported like it's possible. I'm not suggesting that's their goal, to talk the market down, but it's not uncommon as the Fed and BOC do it all the time with their monetary policies.
ranchlandsselling is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ranchlandsselling For This Useful Post:
Old 12-23-2014, 02:50 PM   #202
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt View Post
This seems to be a debate about which benefit the Saudis are enjoying the most.
  • Lower prices hurt Russia
  • Lower prices hurt Iran
  • Lower prices reduce exploration and development spending which leads to
  • higher prices in the long run
  • Lower prices prevent export pipelines in Alberta from being built
  • Lower prices prevent Russian pipelines to China from being built
  • Lower prices prevent/delay a switch to renewable products
  • Lower prices encourage consumption and could lead to an expanded market in the future
A good list, but I think you're missing the simplest reason...to help out their largest customer, China, who could use some low prices to get growth ramped back up. China will be buying their oil for a long time and won't forget it.

All in all, low prices ticks so many boxes for the Saudis in one simple tolerable move.
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 02:52 PM   #203
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014...i-economy.html

but "they can do it forever". Saudi Aramco may be making money, but their country is bleeding bad.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 03:05 PM   #204
ExiledFlamesFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014...i-economy.html

but "they can do it forever". Saudi Aramco may be making money, but their country is bleeding bad.
Yep. They are panicking now. 39 billion deficit with 800 billion in cash reserves left.

The Saudis can outlast anyone. They aren't concerned. All of their competition will be out of business before they run out of cash.

At this deficit rate they'll last more than 20 years before they run out of cash.

Last edited by ExiledFlamesFan; 12-26-2014 at 03:10 PM.
ExiledFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 05:32 PM   #205
oilyfan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
oilyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SE Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Saudis are doing fine, it's others in the OPEC including Venezuela, Iran and Nigeria that are really sliding down the hill.

The Saudis have built a budget based on $60 Brent.
oilyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 05:47 PM   #206
ExiledFlamesFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan View Post
The Saudis are doing fine, it's others in the OPEC including Venezuela, Iran and Nigeria that are really sliding down the hill.

The Saudis have built a budget based on $60 Brent.
It's become apparent that the Saudis no longer care about Nigeria or Venezuela. The Saudis and their Gulf brothers are acting in their own best intersts, Nigeria and Venezuela be damned. There will be casualties.
ExiledFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 05:50 PM   #207
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExiledFlamesFan View Post
Yep. They are panicking now. 39 billion deficit with 800 billion in cash reserves left.

The Saudis can outlast anyone. They aren't concerned. All of their competition will be out of business before they run out of cash.

At this deficit rate they'll last more than 20 years before they run out of cash.
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 05:53 PM   #208
ExiledFlamesFan
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale View Post
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
Which will not happen. Just as Saudis will not run out of cash.
ExiledFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 06:42 PM   #209
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale View Post
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
We'll have race riots that lead to the fleeing of our tax base to other municipalities?

There is no parallel for Detroit. It wasn't just economic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2014, 07:04 PM   #210
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
We'll have race riots that lead to the fleeing of our tax base to other municipalities?

There is no parallel for Detroit. It wasn't just economic.
Yes... people have just moved from the city of Detroit to the surrounding area. Basically just people out of Calgary to whatever other town/cities are nearby.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2014, 03:46 PM   #211
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Better comparisons would be Buffalo or Pittsburgh. I hope we take the Pittsburgh path, that city is doing great again and looks like a really nice place to live.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2014, 11:02 AM   #212
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeGeeWhy View Post
So... If this is indeed a play to control market share, it Would have to be pre-emptive in nature. Meaning, the US must be considering changing it's export laws which indeed would allow US production to threaten the Saudi's grip on the largest and fastest growing oil consumption market in the world.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0K908M20141231

Quote:
(Reuters) - The Obama administration has opened a new front in the global battle for oil market share, effectively clearing the way for the shipment of as much as a million barrels per day of ultra-light U.S. crude to the rest of the world.

The Department of Commerce on Tuesday ended a year-long silence on a contentious, four-decade ban on oil exports, saying it had begun approving a backlog of requests to sell processed light oil abroad. It also issued a long-awaited document outlining exactly what kinds of oil other would-be exporters can ship.

The administration's first serious effort to clarify an issue that has caused confusion and consternation in energy markets for more than a year will likely please domestic oil drillers, foreign trade partners and some Republicans who have urged Obama to loosen the export ban, which they see as an outdated holdover from the 1970s Arab oil embargo.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
Old 12-31-2014, 11:26 AM   #213
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan View Post
Better comparisons would be Buffalo or Pittsburgh. I hope we take the Pittsburgh path, that city is doing great again and looks like a really nice place to live.
Most underrated city in the USA. Love it there.
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
Old 12-31-2014, 12:11 PM   #214
stampsx2
First Line Centre
 
stampsx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Why opec will lose:


Fracking may be unsustainable at $50 a barrel but other opec countries have economic instability while they wait for fracking to fail.

In the mean time, the u.s. benefits from oil profits not funding the iranian nuclear program, islamic state terrorism and russian military modernization.

The, u.s. also benefits from a boost to their economy from lower oil prices.

When oil bottoms out and starts to rise again fracking will resume. Oil revenue countries can't keep oil prices low forever. Not even the saudis. Almost all the opec nations are running budget defecits while they wait.

The longer they wait the lower the break even point for oil fracking becomes as new and better technologies emerge.

main points from a well written article:
http://www.mycentraljersey.com/story...king/20847911/
stampsx2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2014, 07:38 PM   #215
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Very, very interesting. Thanks for the share.

I would like to think that a well organized North American oil and gas distribution network would be able to efficiently deliver our abundant resources to growing Asian markets. I think on the whole, this would benefit Alberta as well as domestic US light oil producers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 09:25 AM   #216
ranchlandsselling
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

So isn't it a little bit hypocritical of the Obama administration to be allowing exportation of up to a million barrels a day of oil when they won't approve the Keystone?
ranchlandsselling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 09:47 AM   #217
Derek Sutton
First Line Centre
 
Derek Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchlandsselling View Post
So isn't it a little bit hypocritical of the Obama administration to be allowing exportation of up to a million barrels a day of oil when they won't approve the Keystone?
Nope, Obama should be concerned with what is best for the USA. Them exporting is much more benficial for them then just letting Canada use their refineries and export Canadian oil out of the Gulf.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
Derek Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Derek Sutton For This Useful Post:
Old 01-01-2015, 05:33 PM   #218
ranchlandsselling
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton View Post
Nope, Obama should be concerned with what is best for the USA. Them exporting is much more benficial for them then just letting Canada use their refineries and export Canadian oil out of the Gulf.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Obama can be and should be concerned about what's best for the USA while still being a hypocrite with respect to how he goes about doing that.

Changing laws that allow them to increase oil extraction in an oversupplied and falling market while vilifiying the KXL as being bad for the environment is hypocritical.

You're right, but it's irrelevant to what I was saying.
ranchlandsselling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 08:15 AM   #219
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Falling through $51 today.

EDIT: through $50 actually. And now $48 the next day. Not much support at these prices at all.

Last edited by chemgear; 01-06-2015 at 10:02 AM.
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2015, 01:54 PM   #220
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

So what would be considered the best way for a casual investor to go long on oil? Do you just buy USO, or do you buy the major companies like SU, CVE, etc.? I know nothing about futures, and don't think that's the best way for a noob like me to invest my money. Unless someone wants to give me a crash course on it.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy