12-23-2014, 08:35 AM
|
#201
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch
The funny thing in all this is that the Saudis aren't actually doing anything to make oil fall - it's purely market forces at work. Ironically they're catching crap for NOT manipulating the market like they usually do.
|
They're certainly enjoying throwing around numbers publically to help. Look how many news outlets carried the "we won't cut if oil hits $20.00". While not calling for $20 oil it's certianly reported like it's possible. I'm not suggesting that's their goal, to talk the market down, but it's not uncommon as the Fed and BOC do it all the time with their monetary policies.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ranchlandsselling For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-23-2014, 02:50 PM
|
#202
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
This seems to be a debate about which benefit the Saudis are enjoying the most.
- Lower prices hurt Russia
- Lower prices hurt Iran
- Lower prices reduce exploration and development spending which leads to
- higher prices in the long run
- Lower prices prevent export pipelines in Alberta from being built
- Lower prices prevent Russian pipelines to China from being built
- Lower prices prevent/delay a switch to renewable products
- Lower prices encourage consumption and could lead to an expanded market in the future
|
A good list, but I think you're missing the simplest reason...to help out their largest customer, China, who could use some low prices to get growth ramped back up. China will be buying their oil for a long time and won't forget it.
All in all, low prices ticks so many boxes for the Saudis in one simple tolerable move.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 02:52 PM
|
#203
|
Franchise Player
|
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014...i-economy.html
but "they can do it forever". Saudi Aramco may be making money, but their country is bleeding bad.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 03:05 PM
|
#204
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
|
Yep. They are panicking now. 39 billion deficit with 800 billion in cash reserves left.
The Saudis can outlast anyone. They aren't concerned. All of their competition will be out of business before they run out of cash.
At this deficit rate they'll last more than 20 years before they run out of cash.
Last edited by ExiledFlamesFan; 12-26-2014 at 03:10 PM.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 05:32 PM
|
#205
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: SE Calgary
|
The Saudis are doing fine, it's others in the OPEC including Venezuela, Iran and Nigeria that are really sliding down the hill.
The Saudis have built a budget based on $60 Brent.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 05:47 PM
|
#206
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilyfan
The Saudis are doing fine, it's others in the OPEC including Venezuela, Iran and Nigeria that are really sliding down the hill.
The Saudis have built a budget based on $60 Brent.
|
It's become apparent that the Saudis no longer care about Nigeria or Venezuela. The Saudis and their Gulf brothers are acting in their own best intersts, Nigeria and Venezuela be damned. There will be casualties.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 05:50 PM
|
#207
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExiledFlamesFan
Yep. They are panicking now. 39 billion deficit with 800 billion in cash reserves left.
The Saudis can outlast anyone. They aren't concerned. All of their competition will be out of business before they run out of cash.
At this deficit rate they'll last more than 20 years before they run out of cash.
|
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
__________________
So far, this is the oldest I've been.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 05:53 PM
|
#208
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
|
Which will not happen. Just as Saudis will not run out of cash.
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 06:42 PM
|
#209
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
And if they did actually go for 20 years, Calgary would be the next Detroit.
|
We'll have race riots that lead to the fleeing of our tax base to other municipalities?
There is no parallel for Detroit. It wasn't just economic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
12-26-2014, 07:04 PM
|
#210
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
We'll have race riots that lead to the fleeing of our tax base to other municipalities?
There is no parallel for Detroit. It wasn't just economic.
|
Yes... people have just moved from the city of Detroit to the surrounding area. Basically just people out of Calgary to whatever other town/cities are nearby.
|
|
|
12-27-2014, 03:46 PM
|
#211
|
My face is a bum!
|
Better comparisons would be Buffalo or Pittsburgh. I hope we take the Pittsburgh path, that city is doing great again and looks like a really nice place to live.
|
|
|
12-31-2014, 11:02 AM
|
#212
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeGeeWhy
So... If this is indeed a play to control market share, it Would have to be pre-emptive in nature. Meaning, the US must be considering changing it's export laws which indeed would allow US production to threaten the Saudi's grip on the largest and fastest growing oil consumption market in the world.
|
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/...0K908M20141231
Quote:
(Reuters) - The Obama administration has opened a new front in the global battle for oil market share, effectively clearing the way for the shipment of as much as a million barrels per day of ultra-light U.S. crude to the rest of the world.
The Department of Commerce on Tuesday ended a year-long silence on a contentious, four-decade ban on oil exports, saying it had begun approving a backlog of requests to sell processed light oil abroad. It also issued a long-awaited document outlining exactly what kinds of oil other would-be exporters can ship.
The administration's first serious effort to clarify an issue that has caused confusion and consternation in energy markets for more than a year will likely please domestic oil drillers, foreign trade partners and some Republicans who have urged Obama to loosen the export ban, which they see as an outdated holdover from the 1970s Arab oil embargo.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-31-2014, 11:26 AM
|
#213
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan
Better comparisons would be Buffalo or Pittsburgh. I hope we take the Pittsburgh path, that city is doing great again and looks like a really nice place to live.
|
Most underrated city in the USA. Love it there.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tyler For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-31-2014, 12:11 PM
|
#214
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Why opec will lose:
Fracking may be unsustainable at $50 a barrel but other opec countries have economic instability while they wait for fracking to fail.
In the mean time, the u.s. benefits from oil profits not funding the iranian nuclear program, islamic state terrorism and russian military modernization.
The, u.s. also benefits from a boost to their economy from lower oil prices.
When oil bottoms out and starts to rise again fracking will resume. Oil revenue countries can't keep oil prices low forever. Not even the saudis. Almost all the opec nations are running budget defecits while they wait.
The longer they wait the lower the break even point for oil fracking becomes as new and better technologies emerge.
main points from a well written article:
http://www.mycentraljersey.com/story...king/20847911/
|
|
|
12-31-2014, 07:38 PM
|
#215
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
|
Very, very interesting. Thanks for the share.
I would like to think that a well organized North American oil and gas distribution network would be able to efficiently deliver our abundant resources to growing Asian markets. I think on the whole, this would benefit Alberta as well as domestic US light oil producers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2015, 09:25 AM
|
#216
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
So isn't it a little bit hypocritical of the Obama administration to be allowing exportation of up to a million barrels a day of oil when they won't approve the Keystone?
|
|
|
01-01-2015, 09:47 AM
|
#217
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sunnyvale
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchlandsselling
So isn't it a little bit hypocritical of the Obama administration to be allowing exportation of up to a million barrels a day of oil when they won't approve the Keystone?
|
Nope, Obama should be concerned with what is best for the USA. Them exporting is much more benficial for them then just letting Canada use their refineries and export Canadian oil out of the Gulf.
__________________
The only thing better then a glass of beer is tea with Ms McGill
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Derek Sutton For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-01-2015, 05:33 PM
|
#218
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Sutton
Nope, Obama should be concerned with what is best for the USA. Them exporting is much more benficial for them then just letting Canada use their refineries and export Canadian oil out of the Gulf.
|
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Obama can be and should be concerned about what's best for the USA while still being a hypocrite with respect to how he goes about doing that.
Changing laws that allow them to increase oil extraction in an oversupplied and falling market while vilifiying the KXL as being bad for the environment is hypocritical.
You're right, but it's irrelevant to what I was saying.
|
|
|
01-05-2015, 08:15 AM
|
#219
|
Franchise Player
|
Falling through $51 today.
EDIT: through $50 actually. And now $48 the next day. Not much support at these prices at all.
Last edited by chemgear; 01-06-2015 at 10:02 AM.
|
|
|
01-13-2015, 01:54 PM
|
#220
|
Franchise Player
|
So what would be considered the best way for a casual investor to go long on oil? Do you just buy USO, or do you buy the major companies like SU, CVE, etc.? I know nothing about futures, and don't think that's the best way for a noob like me to invest my money. Unless someone wants to give me a crash course on it.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.
|
|